Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
True Macro-Photography Forum
Sigma 180mm f/3.5 EX DG IF HSM APO Macro Lens
Jan 9, 2016 10:43:14   #
WayneT Loc: Paris, TN
 
I am looking at a used version of this lens and would like to know if anyone of you has any experience using it. I'm really not interested in the OS factor that the newer Sigma 180 Macro has as I do most of my Macro work on a tripod and the f3.5 vs f2.8 is not that critical for me. Any help out there. Should I go for this one at around $450 or would it be better to wait and save my money on the newer 2.8 model at $1600?

Reply
Jan 9, 2016 11:07:40   #
jeryh Loc: Oxfordshire UK
 
I had exactly this same query; I ended up buying the Sigma 180mm f/3.5 APO HSM lens. I don't think you will be at all disappointed with the performance of this lens. It is perfectly adequate for macro work- I use it mainly handheld, but it should be superb on a tripod!

Reply
Jan 9, 2016 12:42:05   #
tinusbum Loc: east texas
 
i want one! i have the older 150 which i love but would like to have the 180 too

Reply
 
 
Jan 9, 2016 16:15:16   #
Gifted One Loc: S. E. Idaho
 
Many Macro-photographers use speedlight illuimation. My thing is that the aperture is not that important. That being said I have a 2.8 100mm.

Reply
Jan 9, 2016 16:18:42   #
tinusbum Loc: east texas
 
Gifted One wrote:
Very many Mac guys use flash. My thing is that the aperture is not that important. That being said I have a 2.8 100mm.
to me speedlight and diffuser are very important when shooting macro. I use flash for every shot usually at f/16.

Reply
Jan 9, 2016 16:32:10   #
WayneT Loc: Paris, TN
 
I use a speedlight also when needed that's why the f2.8 isn't a necessity. Thanks for the feedback, now I have to find a good one. See lots of units for Canon not my for Nikon.

Reply
Jan 9, 2016 16:32:15   #
Gifted One Loc: S. E. Idaho
 
tinusbum wrote:
to me flash and diffuser are very important when shooting macro,i use flash for every shot usuall at f16
You were one of the ones I was thinking about. you do very good work. I was just talking to a friend earlier today and I plan on many outings with my 8 year old Grand daughter who is a bug person. She shall be my spotter.

Reply
 
 
Jan 9, 2016 16:59:01   #
WayneT Loc: Paris, TN
 
Just found a used one rated E+ at Adorama and pulled the trigger.

Reply
Jan 9, 2016 17:30:44   #
tinusbum Loc: east texas
 
WayneT wrote:
Just found a used one rated E+ at Adorama and pulled the trigger.
i think your going to like it,post some pics when you get it.

Reply
Jan 9, 2016 17:31:51   #
WayneT Loc: Paris, TN
 
tinusbum wrote:
i think your going to like it,post some pics when you get it.
Sometime next week.

Reply
Jan 10, 2016 07:43:25   #
Blurryeyed Loc: NC Mountains.
 
I had the older non OS f/2.8 and it was excellent. They do require a bit more patience than do the 100mm class of lenses but the results can be amazing, clearly the out of focus areas are much more pleasing with the longer lenses.

Another plus with the long lenses is that on a full set of tubes you have a remarkable working distance, depending on the magnification you are looking for the working distance can be measured in feet not inches...

My last comment since with macro work most people manually focus and shoot at f/8 or smaller the f/3.5 maximum aperture should be of little consequence.

Reply
 
 
Jan 10, 2016 09:47:09   #
WayneT Loc: Paris, TN
 
Good point on Max aperture I rarely go below 5.6 especially on a long lens.

Reply
Jan 10, 2016 12:31:31   #
Buckeye Loc: Dayton, OH.
 
I have the Sigma 180mm f/3.5. I was fortunate enough to be managing a camera store when I bought it, so I had the opportunity to compare it to the Tamron 180 and the Canon 180. I chose the Sigma over the Tamron for image quality and the Canon for Value and nearly identical image quality.

Reply
Jan 10, 2016 13:32:14   #
WayneT Loc: Paris, TN
 
Buckeye wrote:
I have the Sigma 180mm f/3.5. I was fortunate enough to be managing a camera store when I bought it, so I had the opportunity to compare it to the Tamron 180 and the Canon 180. I chose the Sigma over the Tamron for image quality and the Canon for Value and nearly identical image quality.
That's really good to know. As others have stated on the forum it's better to hear from people who have actually used a product in real life situations to get an accurate assessment.

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
True Macro-Photography Forum
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.