Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Nikon 16--140 or 16--300?
Page 1 of 2 next>
Dec 8, 2015 21:41:31   #
Wingpilot Loc: Wasilla. Ak
 
After a lot of research before getting a new camera, going back and forth between DSLR and mirrorless, D7200 or A6000' Imthink I have pretty much decided on the D7200. So the question comes up, which lens? I'd rather not have the hassle of having to carry a bunch of lenses around and do changes in the field, so an "everything" lens seems to be in order. The two that I'm looking at are the Nikon 16--140 and the 16--300. How good are these lenses, and is the larger lens too big and heavy to carry around? Is the 16--300 a sharp lens throughout its zoom range?

Reply
Dec 8, 2015 21:51:57   #
jethro779 Loc: Tucson, AZ
 
Wingpilot wrote:
After a lot of research before getting a new camera, going back and forth between DSLR and mirrorless, D7200 or A6000' Imthink I have pretty much decided on the D7200. So the question comes up, which lens? I'd rather not have the hassle of having to carry a bunch of lenses around and do changes in the field, so an "everything" lens seems to be in order. The two that I'm looking at are the Nikon 16--140 and the 16--300. How good are these lenses, and is the larger lens too big and heavy to carry around? Is the 16--300 a sharp lens throughout its zoom range?
After a lot of research before getting a new camer... (show quote)




I think you mean the 18-140 & the 18-300. The only 16-300 I know about says Tamron on it.

Reply
Dec 8, 2015 22:08:25   #
Wingpilot Loc: Wasilla. Ak
 
jethro779 wrote:
I think you mean the 18-140 & the 18-300. The only 16-300 I know about says Tamron on it.


Yes, typo on my part. Those are the ones.

Reply
Check out Printers and Color Printing Forum section of our forum.
Dec 8, 2015 23:50:03   #
LarryFB Loc: Depends where our RV is parked
 
Wingpilot wrote:
After a lot of research before getting a new camera, going back and forth between DSLR and mirrorless, D7200 or A6000' Imthink I have pretty much decided on the D7200. So the question comes up, which lens? I'd rather not have the hassle of having to carry a bunch of lenses around and do changes in the field, so an "everything" lens seems to be in order. The two that I'm looking at are the Nikon 16--140 and the 16--300. How good are these lenses, and is the larger lens too big and heavy to carry around? Is the 16--300 a sharp lens throughout its zoom range?
After a lot of research before getting a new camer... (show quote)


Ignoring the mistakes in the lenses, I would recommend the 18 - 140. I have and use the Nikjon 18-140 as a walk around lens and am very happy with it. I also have a Nikon 55-300 which I do use on occasion (e.g. birding, or wildlife) and it does a good job.

Frankly, the 18-140 has taken the role of a general purpose lens, while the 55-300 is now a special purpose lens.

My 18-55 lens has be relegated to a "do I really need this" lens!

Reply
Dec 9, 2015 00:03:10   #
Wingpilot Loc: Wasilla. Ak
 
The 18--140 is looking better and better.

Reply
Dec 9, 2015 06:50:12   #
Jahawk Loc: Rhode Island
 
LarryFB wrote:
Ignoring the mistakes in the lenses, I would recommend the 18 - 140. I have and use the Nikjon 18-140 as a walk around lens and am very happy with it. I also have a Nikon 55-300 which I do use on occasion (e.g. birding, or wildlife) and it does a good job.

Frankly, the 18-140 has taken the role of a general purpose lens, while the 55-300 is now a special purpose lens.

My 18-55 lens has be relegated to a "do I really need this" lens!



:thumbup: :thumbup:

Reply
Dec 9, 2015 08:11:36   #
billnikon Loc: Pennsylvania/Ohio/Florida/Maui/Oregon/Vermont
 
Wingpilot wrote:
After a lot of research before getting a new camera, going back and forth between DSLR and mirrorless, D7200 or A6000' Imthink I have pretty much decided on the D7200. So the question comes up, which lens? I'd rather not have the hassle of having to carry a bunch of lenses around and do changes in the field, so an "everything" lens seems to be in order. The two that I'm looking at are the Nikon 16--140 and the 16--300. How good are these lenses, and is the larger lens too big and heavy to carry around? Is the 16--300 a sharp lens throughout its zoom range?
After a lot of research before getting a new camer... (show quote)


Moo. Now there is a special on a D750 with a 18-140 that would cost less than a D7200 and a 18-140

Reply
Check out Software and Computer Support for Photographers section of our forum.
Dec 9, 2015 08:42:49   #
mymike Loc: Tucson, AZ
 
Love my 18 -140.

Reply
Dec 9, 2015 08:59:50   #
MT Shooter Loc: Montana
 
billnikon wrote:
Moo. Now there is a special on a D750 with a 18-140 that would cost less than a D7200 and a 18-140


Perhaps you could enlighten us as to WHERE this wonderful, obviously grey market, bargain can be had?

Reply
Dec 9, 2015 10:21:46   #
jerryc41 Loc: Catskill Mts of NY
 
Try some comparisons.

http://www.dpreview.com/products/compare/lenses
http://lenshero.com/lens-comparison
http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/ISO-12233-Sample-Crops.aspx
http://www.lenstip.com/lenses.html
http://www.dxomark.com/Lenses/Compare

Reply
Dec 9, 2015 10:57:11   #
billnikon Loc: Pennsylvania/Ohio/Florida/Maui/Oregon/Vermont
 
MT Shooter wrote:
Perhaps you could enlighten us as to WHERE this wonderful, obviously grey market, bargain can be had?


Come on man. B&h

Reply
Check out Digital Artistry section of our forum.
Dec 9, 2015 11:01:23   #
jaybyrd Loc: Oceanside, CA
 
I have had the tamron 24-300 and 18-270. Size and weight were ok, but was not pleased with the IQ. Have had the Nikon 18-140 for about 2 years and it lives on my D7000. The IQ is excellent. My favorite lens.

Reply
Dec 9, 2015 11:01:47   #
jaybyrd Loc: Oceanside, CA
 
I have had the tamron 24-300 and 18-270. Size and weight were ok, but was not pleased with the IQ. Have had the Nikon 18-140 for about 2 years and it lives on my D7000. The IQ is excellent. My favorite lens.

Reply
Dec 9, 2015 11:04:09   #
Wingpilot Loc: Wasilla. Ak
 
So far, good stuff, and the 18--140 seems to be a clear winner here. But what about the 18--300? No one's mentioned that one. I'm thinking that one would cover the whole spectrum, but if it's not that great a performer, I wouldn't be above picking up something like a good, sharp 70--300 lens.

Reply
Dec 9, 2015 11:07:50   #
bdk Loc: Sanibel Fl.
 
sister in law has the 18 to 300 and loves it, almost never takes it off , If your doing a lot of nature photography this is the one to choose.

Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out AI Artistry and Creation section of our forum.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.