Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
New toy - 7-14mm f/2.8 PRO
Page <prev 2 of 2
Nov 12, 2015 09:38:06   #
DirtFarmer Loc: Escaped from the NYC area, back to MA
 
Morning Star wrote:
...First thing I will have to engrave on my brain, is to watch the lines, especially the vertical ones, like doors, sides of buildings, street lights, etc. so if they have to topple over, at least they topple equal amounts from left and right...


I have a 14-28 for my FF camera. Don't use it much but it gives me fairly straight verticals if I hold it level. As soon as I aim it up or down the verticals start to bend.

Shoot raw, and if you get distortion you can mitigate it in post. I use PS which has a warp adjustment that's pretty good for that (but it takes some practice).

The 14-28 is big and bulky and doesn't fit well in my bag, so it's frequently not there. If I don't have it and need to do a wide landscape, I stitch. I have actually stitched some indoor shots taken at 14mm and it does fairly well, but at those angles it's hard to avoid distortion.

Reply
Nov 12, 2015 09:41:07   #
Morning Star Loc: West coast, North of the 49th N.
 
HERSHEL wrote:
Congrats on the lens. It looks interesting and I might want to own one except there isn't really a lot of room to shoot landscapes in the city. Let us know when you post some photos.

HERSHEL


I would think that even in the city you could get some very nice shots! I'm thinking of "buildings in context" - I've often tilled a frame with a building, then when I looked at the photo later on, I've wondered at what was around that building. In your part of the country, there should be some fantastic viewpoints, made especially for this lens, along the Hudson River. Or along the ocean-side of NY.
My "city" (official standing, but a collection of townships spread over farmland) has some great viewpoints of the mountains. Next summer we hope to go to the Rockies again, but there is also Vancouver, especially the downtown area, where I can see getting some great shots - if and when I collect enough courage to go into the city: traffic is a nightmare and parking next to non-existent.

Reply
Nov 12, 2015 09:44:08   #
Morning Star Loc: West coast, North of the 49th N.
 
GoofyNewfie wrote:
A friend of mine is going to bring me that same lens to try on the Olympus EM-5 he loaned me. Can't wait to give it a go. Thanks for posting.


Goofy, there are several here on the Hog that also have the E-M5, so when you're finished playing, would you post your impressions and results as well?

Reply
 
 
Nov 12, 2015 13:31:11   #
Cdouthitt Loc: Traverse City, MI
 
Morning Star wrote:
I would think that even in the city you could get some very nice shots! I'm thinking of "buildings in context" - I've often tilled a frame with a building, then when I looked at the photo later on, I've wondered at what was around that building. In your part of the country, there should be some fantastic viewpoints, made especially for this lens, along the Hudson River. Or along the ocean-side of NY.
My "city" (official standing, but a collection of townships spread over farmland) has some great viewpoints of the mountains. Next summer we hope to go to the Rockies again, but there is also Vancouver, especially the downtown area, where I can see getting some great shots - if and when I collect enough courage to go into the city: traffic is a nightmare and parking next to non-existent.
I would think that even in the city you could get ... (show quote)


Agree the 7-14 is wonderful for architecture.

Reply
Nov 12, 2015 13:34:22   #
stan0301 Loc: Colorado
 
I use the Sigma 8-16 (Nikon) love it--You will enjoy mounting it vertical and making panoramas
Stan

Reply
Nov 12, 2015 15:09:48   #
flip1948 Loc: Hamden, CT
 
Blurryeyed wrote:
Yes, in a fashion, what I was trying to say and I guess i did not do so effectively is to get the same angle of view on my 7D that the lens gives me on my 6D is I would have to use a 7.5 to 15mm lens. When we talk about mm conversions you are correct, but we generally are talking about going from full frame to a crop frame in which case the lens is longer on the crop frame, in this case I am talking about going from crop frame camera to a full frame in which case the lens is dramatically shorter.... kinda backwards but it illustrate my case, a 10mm lens on my 7D gets an angle of view of about 107 degrees, at 12mm my Sigma gets an angle of view of 128 degrees on my 6D.
Yes, in a fashion, what I was trying to say and I ... (show quote)

If I remember correctly the Sigma 12-24mm zoom is a full frame lens so there is no "factoring" when using it on a full frame camera....it will be 12-24 effective AND actual.

Reply
Nov 12, 2015 20:08:37   #
Blurryeyed Loc: NC Mountains.
 
flip1948 wrote:
If I remember correctly the Sigma 12-24mm zoom is a full frame lens so there is no "factoring" when using it on a full frame camera....it will be 12-24 effective AND actual.


Yes, that may be true, but today there are so many people who actually have little to no experience with full frame cameras, the whole reason that we factor for the crop frame is to give it a point of reference to the full frame camera, a couple of years back that was pretty important as people moved from their full frame SLR to the newer crop frame DSLR's. But today I would argue that a large percentage of amateurs only have experience with crop frame cameras, so their point of practical reference is that crop frame, for instance, I would imagine that some reading my post would think that their Canon 10-22 is wider than my Sigma 12-24 when infact the 10-22 doesn't come close to the Sigma when it is mounted on a full frame camera.... For those folks the a second point of reference may be helpful, one that compares the full frame with which they are not familiar, to the crop frame with which they are very familiar.

Reply
 
 
Nov 12, 2015 20:34:22   #
Morning Star Loc: West coast, North of the 49th N.
 
Blurryeyed wrote:
Yes, that may be true, but today there are so many people who actually have little to no experience with full frame cameras, the whole reason that we factor for the crop frame is to give it a point of reference to the full frame camera, a couple of years back that was pretty important as people moved from their full frame SLR to the newer crop frame DSLR's. But today I would argue that a large percentage of amateurs only have experience with crop frame cameras, so their point of practical reference is that crop frame, for instance, I would imagine that some reading my post would think that their Canon 10-22 is wider than my Sigma 12-24 when infact the 10-22 doesn't come close to the Sigma when it is mounted on a full frame camera.... For those folks the a second point of reference may be helpful, one that compares the full frame with which they are not familiar, to the crop frame with which they are very familiar.
Yes, that may be true, but today there are so many... (show quote)


Until I got my first digital camera, my only experience was with "full frame" cameras (as in 35mm film) and some much larger than that, film with a paper backing.
I remember asking my Dad about these different sizes and he told me: doesn't matter, just look what you see through the viewfinder, and when you're happy with it, press the shutter button. I'm still doing that to this day. Wysiwyg. It sure prevents a lot of headaches!

So in the meantime the promised storm has arrived, there are already some 3000 homes without power (ours is still on) and according to the forecast, tomorrow it will still be blowing hard and rain coming down by the bucket. So, I'm afraid you all will have to wait a day or two for pictures.

Reply
Nov 13, 2015 05:53:42   #
tdekany Loc: Oregon
 
One of the best lenses to have for cities.

7MM

P3010055.jpg by Thomas Dekany, on Flickr

14mm

_1280032-Edit by Thomas Dekany, on Flickr

[quote=Hershel]
Morning Star wrote:
Ever since this lens was announced, I'd been dreaming of it. Stupid of course, I don't get enough sleep as it is!

In any case, I've never owned a wide-angle, landscape type lens before.
Had to put part of it on credit, but got it yesterday. Now there's a whole new learning curve and "watch-it's" wating for me.
OK, the lens is the Olympus 7-14mm f/2.8 PRO. A week or two ago I took my camera to the store, and they let me play with the lens for a bit. I liked what I saw, but there were other customers in the store and I didn't have time to pick it up till yesterday (had to organize my money first). /quote]

Congrats on the lens. It looks interesting and I might want to own one except there isn't really a lot of room to shoot landscapes in the city. Let us know when you post some photos.

HERSHEL
Ever since this lens was announced, I'd been dream... (show quote)

Reply
Nov 21, 2015 12:14:22   #
Morning Star Loc: West coast, North of the 49th N.
 
So, isn't there a saying that goes something like "The best-laid plan of mouse and man..." Suddenly too much going on to go out and take photos. Gonna try again tomorrow afternoon.
However, here's one for now. Taken from our sundeck. Really shows what the rain has done to our railing these last few weeks.
To give some perspective: In the very centre of the photo is a house with a grey roof. According to Google Earth measurement, it is 286 yards from our sundeck.
I have done nothing to this photo, it is straight out of the camera.

Early morning, facing east
Early morning, facing east...
(Download)

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 2
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.