Honest Science Proves Evolution Impossible (Page 5): LOL I see I got James ranting illogically once again lol, this is way too easy....I live in James head 24/7 rent free..... :)...

Racmanaz Loc: Sunny Tucson!

LOL I see I got James ranting illogically once again lol, this is way too easy....I live in James head 24/7 rent free..... :)

Racmanaz Loc: Sunny Tucson!

I'M STILL WAITING!!!>>>>>

"Irreducible Complexity, Specified Complexity, and DNA are entertainingly explained. Each unequivocally proves evolution impossible.

"The theory of Intelligent Design provides a better explanation for the origin of information needed to build these Cambrian than any of the current materialistic theories or models"- Stephen Meyer.

Neo Darwinism is dead, the standard textbook theory is no longer accepted by leading evolutionary biologists themselves. They are moving on to try develop new mechanisms to explain form and information.-Stephen Meyer

"According to Lyle's principal the best explanation is the one that invokes a cause which we know from our experience which can produce the effect we are trying to explain."- Stephen Meyer.

"There is only one known cause for information, that is Intelligence"- Stephen Meyer <<<prove this to be untrue please

<<< I would love to see anyone come up with a better explanation, so far nobody has even attempted to challenge this with an better alternative theory..just the usual ridicule and ad hominem attacks.

James Shaw

Quote:

slocumeddie wrote:
You don't know anything about science..........your posts make that very clear..........

Racmanaz wrote:

My posts are about what Scientists and Philosophers of scientists say not me. Neither you James silver or I know enough about science. But of course James and silver and you think you're smarter than the scientist who believe in intelligent design.

Clown finally admits, correctly, for the first time, that he doesn't know enough about science.

So, how can a science-ignorant fool, like the Clown, make a claim that others, like him, "don't know enough about science?" If he doesn't know, how can he have the audacity to make the same claim of others?

Clown's ploy of course is obvious. Now that many on UHH have convince him that he doesn't know his ass-from-third-base about science, he now attempts to pull others, who can distinguish science from pseudoscience, into the cesspool of ignorance with him.

I have encouraged Clown, on numerous occasions, to become science-literate by visiting the National Academy of Sciences WebSite, He continuously refuses.

Racmanaz Loc: Sunny Tucson!

LIke I said, neither I nor silver nor James nor Eddie know enough about science.........neither one has a science degree. I am humble enough to admit it unlike the others who claim they know more about science than scientists themselves.

James Shaw

Racmanaz wrote:

Ummm...science can in fact PROVE something not to be so, science can PROVE that the blood at a crime scene is NOT mine by DNA analysis.

You have tried this one before using different words and were caught. And you have just admitted you don't know enough about science, which is true.

Again, you are wrong, science does not prove.

Racmanaz Loc: Sunny Tucson!

Racmanaz wrote:
Ummm...science can in fact PROVE something not to be so, science can PROVE that the blood at a crime scene is NOT mine by DNA analysis. <<< prove this to be untrue.

slocumeddie Loc: Inside your head, again

Racmanaz wrote:

My posts are about what Scientists and Philosophers of scientists say not me. Neither you James silver or I know enough about science. But of course James and silver and you think you're smarter than the scientist who believe in intelligent design.

It is your lack of a comprehensive education that leads you to these pseudoscientists and their claims..........

James Shaw

Racmanaz wrote:

Racmanaz wrote:
Ummm...science can in fact PROVE something not to be so, science can PROVE that the blood at a crime scene is NOT mine by DNA analysis. <<< prove this to be untrue.

The burden of "proof" that you seek rest with you, not me.
Science does not prove.

Racmanaz Loc: Sunny Tucson!

slocumeddie wrote:

It is your lack of a comprehensive education that leads you to these pseudoscientists and their claims..........

Prove that it is pseudoscience, you can't because ID uses the same processes as any other scientific observation process. You are in fact the one that show lack of comprehension education. I think Dr Stephen Meyer is more qualified than you or anyone else on here.

Racmanaz Loc: Sunny Tucson!

Racmanaz wrote:
Racmanaz wrote:
Ummm...science can in fact PROVE something not to be so, science can PROVE that the blood at a crime scene is NOT mine by DNA analysis. <<< prove this to be untrue. LOL James backpedaling now, I just PROVED what science can PROVE here. Now James is running scared lol.

James Shaw

Racmanaz wrote:

LIke I said, neither I nor silver nor James nor Eddie know enough about science.........neither one has a science degree. I am humble enough to admit it unlike the others who claim they know more about science than scientists themselves.

Clown finally admits that he doesn't have a science degree.

Clown also claims that he knows that others, also, do not have science degrees. How can the Clown know what degrees others hold, scientific degrees or not?

This science-ignorant-Clown's ploy is to pull rationally-minded individuals into his cesspool of science-ignorance.

Clown refuses, continuously, to become science-literate and deceives himself by believing that others want to do the same. Clown is delusional.

Bangee5 Loc: Louisiana

James Shaw wrote:

b Clown finally admits that he doesn't have a sci... (show quote)

James, you are not going to change Rac's mind. You haven't said anything that he should change his mind.

James Shaw

Quote:

slocumeddie wrote:
It is your lack of a comprehensive education that leads you to these pseudoscientists and their claims..........

Racmanaz wrote:

Prove that it is pseudoscience, you can't because ID uses the same processes as any other scientific observation process. You are in fact the one that show lack of comprehension education. I think Dr Stephen Meyer is more qualified than you or anyone else on here.

"Think" as you will, Clown. ID is pseudoscience.
Neither, you, S.Meyer or others have presented empirical scientific evidence to the contrary.

Racmanaz Loc: Sunny Tucson!

Lol too funny, James wants to others to believe that he is science literate and that he knows more about scientists than the scientist in themselves. Now if you want to know what delusional is that's delusional. Notice how James is diverting from the subject and pointing it towards me personally. I have always admitted that I didn't have a science degree not sure with the surprises. I never once said or implied that I had a science degree I always admitted to the opposite. This is why I used post from scientists themselves not from me and not my words. Did you also notice that James did not confront or refute the words I have been posting from the scientist he's just diverts to the usual personal attacks and ad hominem attacks.

James Shaw

Quote:

James Shaw wrote: br Clown finally admits that he ... (show quote)

Bangee5 wrote:

James, you are not going to change Rac's mind. You haven't said anything that he should change his mind.

Well, Bangee, I am not here to change (your word) another one's mind. Neither I nor you nor your God or any God has the power to do that. It is up to each individual to do that, if they wish to do so and they are capable of doing so, as the mind can be trained to believe anything and can become fixed and incapable of change.

I counter and challenge what I consider to be utter stupidity (irrationality), when I see it, because others may be reading these post who have rational minds that are not "fixed." And, I would hope that your-God and all other-Gods (should they exist) help all of us in keeping our minds open and receptive.