Honest Science Proves Evolution Impossible (Page 11): The parents produced the baby.

Bangee5 Loc: Louisiana

James Shaw wrote:

Who produced the baby? If you believe that it was NOT produced by ID or evolution, then what is responsible for the two heads? Was it your God?

The parents produced the baby.

James Shaw

Bangee5 wrote:

I am not talking about 'queries'. I am saying that... (show quote)

Be specific, as I have plenty to refute what the Clown has said, and have done so:

- there is no such thing as "genetic entropy, as Clown claims"
- mutations are NOT, as you claim, the result of "genetic entropy," caused by the introduction of sin by mans doing.
- the theory of evolution is as strong as it ever has been.
- the theory of evolution is not a religion, as you claim.
- two-headed individuals, whether man or other animals did not arise from what you call "intelligence" nor were they all post-processed in pictures.
- there is no dramatic increases in smallpox and polio and many other childhood diseases, so your statement above is without foundation.
- many humans were immune to death by smallpox virus long before man interceded with the smallpox virus vaccine, contrary to what you claim.
- Immunity is a science which you also know nothing about.
- Science DOES NOT "prove," as this, your thread title, claims.

James Shaw

Quote:

James Shaw wrote:
Belief is just that, belief. Belief in God is not supported by empirical evidence, and that is why it is called belief. God is belief, not supported by empirical evidence.

If you think otherwise, I would like to see your empirical evidence supporting that there is a-God. God is belief only.

Bangee5 wrote:

I do not need proof to believe in God... what is your argument here? That I must have proof before I can believe in a Spiritual being? Why must I have proof?

Belief in God is not evidence of a-God's (or Gods) existence, despite what you believe.

Proof is your word, not mine. I did not ask you to prove anything. There is no proof of a-God's existence.

James Shaw

Quote:

Bangee5 wrote:
That is not evolution. The baby was born from normal parents. Not from a new form of human beings. The baby, should it become an adult and should find a member of the opposite sex and have a baby - the baby will be born with one head, not two. A normal baby. Therefore, it is not by evolution.

Racmanaz wrote:

Very good point there and very well articulated Bangee.

Where then did the tendency for those parents to rise to a two-headed child arise?

James Shaw

Racmanaz wrote:

"Irreducible Complexity, Specified Complexity... (show quote)

Clown foolery. Another post exactly like that posted earlier.

S.Meyer is not science. Go to the NAS website if you really want to know science. Your refusal indicates that you wish to remain ignorant, but of course you have already admitted you are science ignorant.

If you are science ignorant then how do you know that S.Meyer is not?

Bangee5 Loc: Louisiana

James Shaw wrote:

Belief in God is not evidence of a-God's (or Gods) existence, despite what you believe.

Proof is your word, not mine. I did not ask you to prove anything. There is no proof of a-God's existence.

So, what is your point? I don't need to prove anything to you. Believe as you wish.

Bangee5 Loc: Louisiana

James Shaw wrote:

Where then did the tendency for those parents to rise to a two-headed child arise?

From their heart.

James Shaw

Quote:

James Shaw wrote:
If you believe it was not by evolution, then by what mechanism was it that gave rise to the tendency for those two parents to have a baby with two heads?

Bangee5 wrote:

Sex!

But, sex also gives rise to babies with one head. So, you are not very profound in your answer.

It is believed that evolution gave rise to gender differences in both animals and plants. Evolution is not perfect.

James Shaw

Quote:

James Shaw wrote:
Where then did the tendency for those parents to rise to a two-headed child arise?

Bangee5 wrote:

From their heart.

From desires of the heart comes babies with only one head. So, your statement is not profound.

It is believed that evolution gave rise to gender difference in animals and plants. Evolution is not perfect.

James Shaw

Quote:

James Shaw wrote:
Belief in God is not evidence of a-God's (or Gods) existence, despite what you believe.

Proof is your word, not mine. I did not ask you to prove anything. There is no proof of a-God's existence.

Bangee5 wrote:

So, what is your point? I don't need to prove anything to you. Believe as you wish.

I did not ask you to "prove" anything to me.

Bangee5 Loc: Louisiana

James Shaw wrote:

From desires of the heart comes babies with only one head. So, your statement is not profound.

It is believed that evolution gave rise to gender difference in animals and plants. Evolution is not perfect.

James, where is your proof that evolution cause a baby to be born with two heads? Why not babies born with three heads or four or more. Your logic is profound and your word means nothing.

By the way, the baby was conjoined twins and it died.

Bangee5 Loc: Louisiana

James Shaw wrote:

I did not ask you to "prove" anything to me.

And I wont but you did ask for proof, did you not?

"I would like to see your empirical evidence supporting that there is a-God."

James Shaw

Quote:

James Shaw wrote:
Belief in God is not evidence of a-God's (or Gods) existence, despite what you believe.

Proof is your word, not mine. I did not ask you to prove anything. There is no proof of a-God's existence.

Bangee5 wrote:

So, what is your point? I don't need to prove anything to you. Believe as you wish.

My point, once again, is that belief, alone, is not evidence.

James Shaw

Bangee5 wrote:

And I wont but you did ask for proof, did you not?

"I would like to see your empirical evidence supporting that there is a-God."

No, I did not ask for proof. I merely ask for empirical evidence if you believe there exists a God. Asking for evidence is not the same as asking for proof.

Proof is an entirely matter and much more complicated. The word, "proof" is overused and misused on UHH, quite frequently. It is one of the Clown's favorite words.

James Shaw

Quote:

James Shaw wrote:
From desires of the heart comes babies with only one head. So, your statement is not profound.

It is believed that evolution gave rise to gender difference in animals and plants. Evolution is not perfect.

Bangee5 wrote:

James, where is your proof that evolution cause a baby to be born with two heads? Why not babies born with three heads or four or more. Your logic is profound and your word means nothing.

By the way, the baby was conjoined twins and it died.

Evolution is a scientific theory. Despite that it is one of the most strongly supported scientific theories of all times, it has not been proven.

Many, however, inside and outside the scientific community realize that there is such overwhelming scientific evidence that they have accepted it as proof.

The same was said for Newton's law of gravity, that is, until Einstein came along 300 years later and changed the whole way we view and think about gravity.