Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Links and Resources
Will this help prevent images from being stolen?
Oct 21, 2015 08:03:23   #
catfish252
 
The JPEG Committee is contemplating adding DRM (Digital Rights Management) to the JPEG format. Do you think it will help prevent images from being misused? See here:

http://www.dpreview.com/articles/8581970544/jpeg-committee-contemplates-adding-drm-to-image-format?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=generic&ref_=pe_1822230_153593070

Reply
Oct 21, 2015 08:10:28   #
Morning Star Loc: West coast, North of the 49th N.
 
catfish252 wrote:
The JPEG Committee is contemplating adding DRM (Digital Rights Management) to the JPEG format. Do you think it will help prevent images from being misused? See here:

http://www.dpreview.com/articles/8581970544/jpeg-committee-contemplates-adding-drm-to-image-format?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=generic&ref_=pe_1822230_153593070


It will prevent a number of folks from using the image without permission, but you can be sure that someone will come up with a crack for the jpg-drm.

Reply
Oct 21, 2015 08:12:36   #
Jim Bob
 
Morning Star wrote:
It will prevent a number of folks from using the image without permission, but you can be sure that someone will come up with a crack for the jpg-drm.


:thumbup:

Reply
 
 
Oct 21, 2015 08:33:38   #
jerryc41 Loc: Catskill Mts of NY
 
catfish252 wrote:
The JPEG Committee is contemplating adding DRM (Digital Rights Management) to the JPEG format. Do you think it will help prevent images from being misused? See here:

http://www.dpreview.com/articles/8581970544/jpeg-committee-contemplates-adding-drm-to-image-format?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=generic&ref_=pe_1822230_153593070

You can't defeat PrtScn.

Reply
Oct 21, 2015 08:59:07   #
Rongnongno Loc: FL
 
catfish252 wrote:
The JPEG Committee is contemplating adding DRM (Digital Rights Management) to the JPEG format. Do you think it will help prevent images from being misused? See here:

http://www.dpreview.com/articles/8581970544/jpeg-committee-contemplates-adding-drm-to-image-format?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=generic&ref_=pe_1822230_153593070

No. I read about it two days. As one has pointed out earlier nothing prevents someone to open an image in PS CC by example, create a copy after selecting all and paste it as a new image. Everything as pixels goes is copied the rest is left out. This is similar to playing a movie and record it. DRM? bzzzt...

DRM only indicates that you do not want your image(s) used in. That has never stopped anyone and since using someone else work to produce your own is now perfectly legal (refer to recent court decisions in the US.).

In the same article it was pushed that you could use a password to open an image in order to edit it. All good and great but... Every time you try to use it for display or sale it or whatever you will need to give the password in order to do so. This raises another problem. You would need to create a different password per image or set of images... Good luck with that.

I think that this committee should address other things like the lousy 'lossy' additive compression logarithm used. Ah, oh, JPG 2000 and JPGX addressed that but no one has accepted these changes because it would have meant changing JPG flat tire (user end)... Who wants to be the first? The chicken or the egg? The chicken chickened out before one had the time to ask the egg.

Reply
Oct 21, 2015 09:01:07   #
Rongnongno Loc: FL
 
jerryc41 wrote:
You can't defeat PrtScn.

err think about what you are saying here. A screen can display only a small part of the real data inside any image so a print screen?

Reply
Oct 21, 2015 09:14:25   #
jgitomer Loc: Skippack Pennsylvania
 
Rongnongno wrote:
err think about what you are saying here. A screen can display only a small part of the real data inside any image so a print screen?


Yes, but! Many of those who steal others work don't seem to care about image quality.

Jerry

Reply
 
 
Oct 21, 2015 09:45:19   #
Rongnongno Loc: FL
 
jgitomer wrote:
Yes, but! Many of those who steal others work don't seem to care about image quality.

Jerry


Quality like that? Give me a break will you we are speaking of serious photography not crappy captures, even if it applies to everything.

Reply
Oct 22, 2015 07:18:36   #
Carl D Loc: Albemarle, NC.
 
I can hear the hackers warming up now.

Reply
Oct 26, 2015 15:37:10   #
rmalarz Loc: Tempe, Arizona
 
catfish252 wrote:
The JPEG Committee is contemplating adding DRM (Digital Rights Management) to the JPEG format. Do you think it will help prevent images from being misused? See here:

http://www.dpreview.com/articles/8581970544/jpeg-committee-contemplates-adding-drm-to-image-format?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=generic&ref_=pe_1822230_153593070


People who want to steal images will still steal them.
--Bob

Reply
Oct 29, 2015 10:46:31   #
bkyser Loc: Fly over country in Indiana
 
Only way to guarantee that none of your images are EVER stolen is to never post them, or email them. Shoot, probably want to avoid even uploading them from your memory card to your computer.

Reply
 
 
Oct 29, 2015 17:33:14   #
woody14010 Loc: Texas
 
If you're worried about it don't put them on the internet - simple!!

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Links and Resources
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.