Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register ☰
The Attic
Why We Don't Look Like Chimps
Page <<first <prev 8 of 14 next> last>>
Oct 7, 2015 16:17:28   #
Racmanaz Loc: Sunny Tucson!
 
Just so everyone is clear about 2 things. Darwinian evolution hypotheses has been around deceiving souls for over 150 years. Intelligent design/ Creation truth has been around for at least 6,000 to 4.5 billion years and standing strong. Darwinian evolution is not based on observable scientific facts. Darwinian evolution cannot be observed therefore it is not based on science, it is based solely on speculation and faith.

Reply
Oct 7, 2015 16:53:27   #
slocumeddie Loc: Inside your head, again
 
Racmanaz wrote:
Just so everyone is clear about 2 things. Darwinian evolution hypotheses has been around deceiving souls for over 150 years. Intelligent design/ Creation truth has been around for at least 6,000 to 4.5 billion years and standing strong. Darwinian evolution is not based on observable scientific facts. Darwinian evolution cannot be observed therefore it is not based on science, it is based solely on speculation and faith.
Just so everyone(and Rac) is clear about 2 things. Intelligent design/creationism is not based on observable scientific facts. It cannot be observed therefore it is not based on science. It is based solely on speculation and faith.

Reply
Oct 7, 2015 16:56:16   #
silver Loc: Santa Monica Ca.
 
Racmanaz wrote:
I KNOW HOW SCIENCE WORKS, well at least in the way you discribed! You are missing the point...it's what science does to YOUR theory of Darwinian evolution...it dismantles that theory yet Darwinist keep changing that theory to make it believable when it's actually been proven to be false. If Creationist keep changing their "theory", all of you darwinist would be on their doorsteps yelling and screaming that science proved Creationists wrong. You would even be doing the same of Creationists modified and changed their views to fit the latest science discoveries if it contradicted their original theory.
I KNOW HOW SCIENCE WORKS, well at least in the way... (show quote)


http://www.phy.duke.edu/~rgb/Philosophy/axioms/axioms/node47.html

Reply
 
 
Oct 7, 2015 16:56:37   #
silver Loc: Santa Monica Ca.
 
Racmanaz wrote:
The confusion is from darwinists not Creationists, the darwinist have the habit of changing their own theories constantly and it's difficult to know exactly what they believe. First we evolved from apes, then orangutans, than chimps...now the deceptive phrase "ape-like creatures", what the hell are ape like creatures, what is the identity of them? Darwinists change their false theories like dirty diapers.....on a daily basis. Darwinism is just nonsense and has ZERO observable scientific evidence.
The confusion is from darwinists not Creationists,... (show quote)


http://www.phy.duke.edu/~rgb/Philosophy/axioms/axioms/node47.html

Reply
Oct 7, 2015 16:57:15   #
silver Loc: Santa Monica Ca.
 
Racmanaz wrote:
Just so everyone is clear about 2 things. Darwinian evolution hypotheses has been around deceiving souls for over 150 years. Intelligent design/ Creation truth has been around for at least 6,000 to 4.5 billion years and standing strong. Darwinian evolution is not based on observable scientific facts. Darwinian evolution cannot be observed therefore it is not based on science, it is based solely on speculation and faith.
Such bullshit.

http://www.phy.duke.edu/~rgb/Philosophy/axioms/axioms/node47.html

Reply
Oct 7, 2015 16:58:58   #
Racmanaz Loc: Sunny Tucson!
 
slocumeddie wrote:
Just so everyone(and Rac) is clear about 2 things. Intelligent design/creationism is not based on observable scientific facts. It cannot be observed therefore it is not based on science. It is based solely on speculation and faith.


Wrong again my friend, we see intelligent design in creation throughout life every single day you see intelligent signs create computer codes computers cameras cars automobiles trains ships electronic devices medicine medical supplies medical tools excetera excetera. Nothing that we see today or ever that has been designed has come about by natural processes it always takes an intelligence source. Therefore when we see specified complexities in organisms we refer to what we see today intelligence creating complexities especially specified complexity.

Reply
Oct 7, 2015 16:58:59   #
Racmanaz Loc: Sunny Tucson!
 
slocumeddie wrote:
Just so everyone(and Rac) is clear about 2 things. Intelligent design/creationism is not based on observable scientific facts. It cannot be observed therefore it is not based on science. It is based solely on speculation and faith.


Wrong again my friend, we see intelligent design in creation throughout life every single day you see intelligent signs create computer codes computers cameras cars automobiles trains ships electronic devices medicine medical supplies medical tools excetera excetera. Nothing that we see today or ever that has been designed has come about by natural processes it always takes an intelligence source. Therefore when we see specified complexities in organisms we infer to what we see today intelligence creating complexities especially specified complexity.

Reply
 
 
Oct 7, 2015 17:00:04   #
silver Loc: Santa Monica Ca.
 
Racmanaz wrote:
Wrong again my friend, we see intelligent design in creation throughout life every single day you see intelligent signs create computer codes computers cameras cars automobiles trains ships electronic devices medicine medical supplies medical tools excetera excetera. Nothing that we see today or ever that has been designed has come about by natural processes it always takes an intelligence source. Therefore when we see specified complexities in organisms we refer to what we see today intelligence creating complexities especially specified complexity.
Wrong again my friend, we see intelligent design i... (show quote)


http://www.phy.duke.edu/~rgb/Philosophy/axioms/axioms/node47.html

Reply
Oct 7, 2015 17:00:15   #
silver Loc: Santa Monica Ca.
 
Racmanaz wrote:
Wrong again my friend, we see intelligent design in creation throughout life every single day you see intelligent signs create computer codes computers cameras cars automobiles trains ships electronic devices medicine medical supplies medical tools excetera excetera. Nothing that we see today or ever that has been designed has come about by natural processes it always takes an intelligence source. Therefore when we see specified complexities in organisms we refer to what we see today intelligence creating complexities especially specified complexity.
Wrong again my friend, we see intelligent design i... (show quote)


http://www.phy.duke.edu/~rgb/Philosophy/axioms/axioms/node47.html

Reply
Oct 7, 2015 18:11:02   #
SonnyE Loc: Communist California, USA
 
Jackel wrote:
Why we don't look like Chimps? Have you looked at a recent picture of Michelle Obama? If you have, and still promote this idiocy shown in your message, you'd better see your opthamologist....and sooner, rather than later.


Well now, Jackel, you are touching on another study.
The one about hairless apes.
Genetics...
http://www.dailystormer.com/black-africans-are-genetically-closer-to-bonobos-than-to-white-humans/

Reply
Oct 7, 2015 19:18:57   #
James Shaw
 
Racmanaz wrote:
Just so everyone is clear about 2 things. Darwinian evolution hypotheses has been around deceiving souls for over 150 years. Intelligent design/ Creation truth has been around for at least 6,000 to 4.5 billion years and standing strong. Darwinian evolution is not based on observable scientific facts. Darwinian evolution cannot be observed therefore it is not based on science, it is based solely on speculation and faith.
A resounding gong; a clanging symbol. A clown without qualifications makes conclusions that are not based on evidence.
Is there any wonder why this clown is not taken seriously? Is there any wonder why this clown is science ignorant?
___________
May 12, 2015· Charles Darwin's theory of evolution and natural selection isn't an idea with holes. It's one of the most solid theories in science. But what exactly is it?
http://www.livescience.com/474-controversy-evolution-works.html

"Evolution by natural selection is one of the best substantiated theories in the history of science, supported by evidence from a wide variety of scientific disciplines, including paleontology, geology, genetics and developmental biology."

Reply
 
 
Oct 7, 2015 20:06:43   #
SonnyE Loc: Communist California, USA
 
James Shaw wrote:
A resounding gong; a clanging symbol. A clown without qualifications makes conclusions that are not based on evidence.
Is there any wonder why this clown is not taken seriously? Is there any wonder why this clown is science ignorant?
___________
May 12, 2015· Charles Darwin's theory of evolution and natural selection isn't an idea with holes. It's one of the most solid theories in science. But what exactly is it?
http://www.livescience.com/474-controversy-evolution-works.html

"Evolution by natural selection is one of the best substantiated theories in the history of science, supported by evidence from a wide variety of scientific disciplines, including paleontology, geology, genetics and developmental biology."
A resounding gong; a clanging symbol. A clown wit... (show quote)


Musta been your knoggin doin the gongin, Jimmy boy.
I guess you missed Steven Hawking withdrawing his theory.
"I.. was... wrong..."

Science, is a man-made creation. And as such is very limited.
Basically ideas by puffed up egotistical braininess trying to out do each other.

But do rave on... it'll only shorten your life.
Do pound your chest like some silver back trying to hold onto his harem.
All to soon your words will fade and be forgotten, just like all man-made sciences fail, and we will all return to dust.
Or is that a bit too factual for you?

Reply
Oct 7, 2015 20:15:15   #
James Shaw
 
Quote:
James Shaw wrote:
A resounding gong; a clanging symbol. A clown without qualifications makes conclusions that are not based on evidence.
Is there any wonder why this clown is not taken seriously? Is there any wonder why this clown is science ignorant?
___________
May 12, 2015· Charles Darwin's theory of evolution and natural selection isn't an idea with holes. It's one of the most solid theories in science. But what exactly is it?
http://www.livescience.com/474-controversy-evolution-works.html

"Evolution by natural selection is one of the best substantiated theories in the history of science, supported by evidence from a wide variety of scientific disciplines, including paleontology, geology, genetics and developmental biology."
James Shaw wrote: br A resounding gong; a clanging... (show quote)
SonnyE wrote:
Musta been your knoggin doin the gongin, Jimmy boy.
I guess you missed Steven Hawking withdrawing his theory.
"I.. was... wrong..."

Science, is a man-made creation. And as such is very limited.
Basically ideas by puffed up egotistical braininess trying to out do each other.

But do rave on... it'll only shorten your life.
Do pound your chest like some silver back trying to hold onto his harem.
All to soon your words will fade and be forgotten, just like all man-made sciences fail, and we will all return to dust.
Or is that a bit too factual for you?
Musta been your knoggin doin the gongin, Jimmy boy... (show quote)

Oh, SE, delusion best fits you. Think science the next time you flip on a light switch. You live in a science-created world.

Reply
Oct 7, 2015 20:26:52   #
SonnyE Loc: Communist California, USA
 
James Shaw wrote:
Oh, SE, delusion best fits you. Think science the next time you flip on a light switch. You live in a science-created world.


http://www.livescience.com/49958-theory-no-big-bang.html
Sorry I forgot this in the post.

BTW, I was one of the forerunners bringing power to the grid...

Reply
Oct 7, 2015 20:33:09   #
green Loc: 22.1749611,-159.646704,20
 
SonnyE wrote:
http://www.livescience.com/49958-theory-no-big-bang.html
Sorry I forgot this in the post.

BTW, I was one of the forerunners bringing power to the grid...


are you... Sonny Edison?

interesting article by the way, unfortunately our mathematics doesn't handle infinity very well...

at least he agrees that it was very, very small 13 Billion years ago, whether it was a big bang or just a moderate bounce.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 8 of 14 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
The Attic
Home | Latest Digest | Back to Top | All Sections
Contact us | Privacy policy | Terms of use | DMCA
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.