SonnyE Loc: Communist California, USA

Very far from stupid, silver.

Let me enlighten you...

"When an atheist called him a “moron” for believing in God, Dr. Ben Carson responded with one brilliant line that put the atheist in his place. “I believe I came from God, and you believe you came from a monkey,” he told the individual, “and you’ve convinced me you’re right.”

So you see sliver, I gave you your hero, Oblammo. Monkey ears and all.
And his salute to his supporters. You stupid jock strap.

James Shaw

SE often comes across as if he has a chip on his shoulder.

shagbat Loc: London

He is well ballanced James, he has a chip on each shoulder!

SonnyE Loc: Communist California, USA

However you wieners want to see it.
What I do have is a working brain that is not blindly lead by some political crap.

And the word is balanced, shagbat.
You should enable a spell checker on your box of rocks so you can at least appear intelligent.
My God, you are a Brit, get a command on your language.

SonnyE Loc: Communist California, USA

Hey James, have you been thinking today?
Any? Even a modicum?

Sliver, (because he doesn't amount to any more wood than that) appears to have ducked out of the conversation.

Of the hats in the ring, I do think I like Dr. Ben Carson the best.
And he is astronomically above Hillbillery Klingon. And any other socialist being served up by the Dumpocrap party.

No chip. Just know when I'm right.

silver Loc: Santa Monica Ca.

Ridiculous nonsense. Try again.

silver Loc: Santa Monica Ca.

Your right?????? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

slocumeddie Loc: Inside your head, again

Here, Rac, is more truth from Tour, who considers himself a Messianic Jew.....


In 2001, Tour signed the Discovery Institute's "A Scientific Dissent From Darwinism", a controversial petition which the intelligent design movement uses to promote intelligent

design by attempting to cast doubt on evolution. To those who "are disconcerted or even angered that I signed a statement back in 2001" he responded "I have been labeled

as an Intelligent Design (ID) proponent. I am not. I do not know how to use science to prove intelligent design although some others might. I am sympathetic to the

arguments on the matter and I find some of them intriguing, but the scientific proof is not there, in my opinion. So I prefer to be free of that ID label."

LarJgrip Loc: The Fraser Valley

Wow!!

SonnyE Loc: Communist California, USA

Very, sliver.
I'm a red dot in a blue State.
Chimp.

And around, and around, and around...

silver Loc: Santa Monica Ca.

HAHAHAHAHA try again when you get your brain. By the way I hear that the squirrels are collecting nuts early this year, you better watch out for them.

SonnyE Loc: Communist California, USA

See why I call you sliver?
You really do not have anything going on for you.
You deflect with complete bullshit.
Sigh, step over there, to the Ignore line.

boberic Loc: Quiet Corner, Connecticut. Ex long Islander

[quote=Racmanaz]Just another scientific evidence for Creation from God.

[b]"Let's consider just one part of the transition that would be required -- to go from an ape-like face to a human one. The portraits of our supposed ancestors are in museums everywhere, and on the web pages of National Geographic -- the latest one, H. naledi, can be found there now. But whether or not that reconstructed face is a part of our history, the question remains: Is there enough time for us to have acquired by purely, Darwinian natural processes the differences that make us look hu
So let's ask the question. Could naturalistic processes guided only by natural selection have accomplished any of this? Changes to the expression of one gene or another can affect morphology -- changing the expression of the gene ALX1 affects the size and shape of finch beaks, for example. Getting one regulatory change to an enhancer is not impossible. But there are multiple enhancers controlling multiple genes involved in facial morphology (see the paper in Nature by Lamichhaney et al.), and to get coordinated regulation of multiple genes, multiple enhancers must have changed in a coordinated fashion.

Is that possible? Durrett and Schmidt published a paper examining how long it would take to have two coordinated mutations (one inactivating and the other activating) take place in an evolving hominin population. They found it would require in excess of 100 million years. Obviously, the hominin population did not have that long to wait for regulatory change. We supposedly diverged from chimps six million years ago.

Nowhere in this paper is it demonstrated that anything like this regulatory network could have evolved step by step in the time available. All it establishes is that our faces are different from chimps because we have different regulatory sequences. In fact, I don't know of anywhere it has been demonstrated that regulatory changes on this scale could be the product of evolution.

In the meantime, we do know something that can coordinate change on this scale. It's called intelligence.

http://www.evolutionnews.org/2015/10/why_we_dont_loo099831.html[/quote] You just might just have asked- why don't humans look like earthworms. Its a stupid question.

silver Loc: Santa Monica Ca.

I really couldn't care less about your ignore.

James Shaw

:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: