lachmap wrote:
To quote the beatles: HELP.
OK I bought a canon 50D in LA 2 years ago while on a trip the day before I left to come back to Australia. My fantastic 12mp fuji s7000 broke (I could have cried!!! but had enough $$$ in the kitty to buy a new camera and always wanted a DSLR!!!). So what is the problem - is it the camera, the kit lens (28-135 IS USM) or me???
I have the focus set on the centre focus spot only (is this wrong) and use aperture priority.
I have attached a shot which was taken at 1/250th sec, f10, 400 ISO hand held on a sunny day.
The second shot was the same except 320th sec. I thought these would be fast enough to not need a tripod.
Like all my shots taken with this camera and lens it doesn't seem to be focussed. I always use the highest quality jpg setting (plus raw in case I can find out how to fix it in post processing!!).
I have also used a 20mm sigma lens and pics have the same problem. Canon checked both lens and camera out (here in Aus) and said it was fine!!!!
To quote the beatles: HELP. br br OK I bought a c... (
show quote)
I'm glad I waited till late to add on to this post. I have pictures of Bridalveil falls in Yosemite last year and they don't look at all like yours. Mine are all done as panoramas in order to get the whole setting. I use the same camera as you do but a 17-85 lens. I shoot on a tripod, AV, f22, & ISO100. I always shoot in raw as it gives me the best options for editing. At ISO 400 I start getting an excessive amount of noise. I have since purchased Canon's 18 to 200 lens and like it quite well. I don't get a perfect focus every time so I take a sufficient number of photos to compensate. What's nice about digital is that it doesn't cost more to throw away bad images. The professional photographers throw a lot in the trash can. I've attached mine taken with the above settings. I hope you don't mind as maybe it could help you in your photographic journey.
Bridalview Falls Yosemite Nat Park
Hi Llindstrand, very nice pic. What speed was that? I agree about the tripod. One day. Yes I know about the noise factor. Have noticed that hand-held is harder these days as I find it difficult to stop the camera moving unless I lean it against something.
So to sum it up it looks as though I will either have to have a tripod with me most of the time, take my time, take many shots of the one thing to get one or two good ones, and practice a lot more.
Pity about the tripod bit.
Found a fantastic spider web at the park this morning but had 4 dogs with me. So had to hand hold. Low light and a breeze meant I had to go to 800 ISO to get a fast enough speed (1/500) to cancel the movement and get a large enough F stop (f16) to get some depth into it. Once again, as I am learning, I tried to manually focus which as I said earlier is easier for me when close up and there is some contrast. You can see the pic below. I have increased the saturation, sharpened and edge-preserve smoothed. This is also cut slightly.
I also had to be quick to snap a pic because the dogs of course come over to see what I am doing and walk all over it.
Spider web in park.
lachmap wrote:
Hi Llindstrand, very nice pic. What speed was that? I agree about the tripod. One day. Yes I know about the noise factor. Have noticed that hand-held is harder these days as I find it difficult to stop the camera moving unless I lean it against something.
So to sum it up it looks as though I will either have to have a tripod with me most of the time, take my time, take many shots of the one thing to get one or two good ones, and practice a lot more.
You might want to get a Monopod. Easier and faster than a tripod, but not as motion free. Most of the big time sports photographers use them. I use one a lot.
Mike
lachmap wrote:
Hi Llindstrand, very nice pic. What speed was that? I agree about the tripod. One day. Yes I know about the noise factor. Have noticed that hand-held is harder these days as I find it difficult to stop the camera moving unless I lean it against something.
So to sum it up it looks as though I will either have to have a tripod with me most of the time, take my time, take many shots of the one thing to get one or two good ones, and practice a lot more.
Pity about the tripod bit.
Found a fantastic spider web at the park this morning but had 4 dogs with me. So had to hand hold. Low light and a breeze meant I had to go to 800 ISO to get a fast enough speed (1/500) to cancel the movement and get a large enough F stop (f16) to get some depth into it. Once again, as I am learning, I tried to manually focus which as I said earlier is easier for me when close up and there is some contrast. You can see the pic below. I have increased the saturation, sharpened and edge-preserve smoothed. This is also cut slightly.
I also had to be quick to snap a pic because the dogs of course come over to see what I am doing and walk all over it.
Hi Llindstrand, very nice pic. What speed was that... (
show quote)
Those were shot at 1/25th sec on AV. You have to be steady at that slow a speed. That is where you are apt to get the better quality of the waterfall. We were extremely lucky on that trip as there was a lot of snow up above so we had enormous water flows. Also focus was 85mm. I am not happy at times carrying a tripod. The first one I got was a light aluminum and I still use it if I have to carry a long time. However, it wasn't very sturdy so I bought a heavier one with a better head that would adjust in all planes. Also picked up a panoramic indexer as I take a lot of panoramas. Even with all that I am happy if I get one ot of a hundred images that is special. In that there may be several that are quite good but don't have perfect focus. The picture that I posted is made up out of about 9 images as it is a triple row panorama. If you are interested there are a lot more on my website:
http://www.photosbyswede.com I also have a mono-pod, but I cannot set it up steady enough to do that kind of panorama
Swede
Thanks mate. My daughter and I were there 3 years ago. Wonderful trip.
I think a monopod would really help - either that or a tripod with one leg extended!!!!!
renomike wrote:
lachmap wrote:
I have attached a shot which was taken at 1/250th sec, f10, 400 ISO hand held on a sunny day.
The second shot was the same except 320th sec. I thought these would be fast enough to not need a tripod.
Here's your photo sharpened, levels adjusted, and saturation increased.
Mike
Nice shop'n, what sharpening tool do you use, i like the high pass filter.
I too felt that my photos were soft focused After months of practicing different weather conditions and times of day, it became obvious that sunny days were sharpest, gray days were softer. Maybe someone was pulling my leg, but they said there is more moisture in the air on overcast days and moisture affects the clarity of a shot. Think of fog on the water, and go with the flow- some days you will be off.
ftpecktim wrote:
Nice shop'n, what sharpening tool do you use, i like the high pass filter.
I haven't tried that one as yet, but I've heard good things about using high pass. I have three I use, depending on which works best for the photo I'm working on. I have Topaz InFocus, Topaz Lens Effect, and Zoner Studio Pro 13 which has a few different one in the program. I also have a few different PS ones too.
Mike
Lachmap....You have received LOTS of great advice and technical input. I have the same Camera along with several Canon lens including the original 17-85. My input is to pack a lunch, bring an extra battery or two and go out somewhere you like to shoot. Bring a log book and go through some of the setting suggested by other photographers. Practice, practice and practice. The next day look at your pictures and consult the log. May seem tedious but as a photographer I never stop learning, never stop reading and never stop practicing and experimenting. Good shooting.
Di.Longstreet wrote:
I too felt that my photos were soft focused After months of practicing different weather conditions and times of day, it became obvious that sunny days were sharpest, gray days were softer. Maybe someone was pulling my leg, but they said there is more moisture in the air on overcast days and moisture affects the clarity of a shot. Think of fog on the water, and go with the flow- some days you will be off.
No leg pulling going on with humidity and weather conditions, times of day, etc.
Depending on time of year here, and the type picture you're trying to take, humidity can be both a benefit, and. or, a curse.
Something I found was causing me troubles with focus, especially with viewfinder, which I do almost ALWAYS, is the diopter correction. That little knob can get bumped without realizing it, and I have trouble focusing, so I search trying to find the sweet spot.
ftpecktim wrote:
Nice shop'n, what sharpening tool do you use, i like the high pass filter.
You peaked my interest... So I had to try it. You are right, it does do a great job. Thanks, another great tool in the belt....;0)
Mike
I am new to this and I am NO expert so this is just my opinion...I think I would have used a lower ISO (100) and have your white balance on either auto or sun and if you have a landscape photo style in your menu. I would keep practicing. At least the falls aren't going anywhere:)
Nicely done rework Renomike.
try and drop ISO to 200 and use shutter mode to see if this helps any. have a nikon d5000 and starting to learn how to use other modes to get better pictures, enjoy and play with all the setting
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.