Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Photo Analysis
Portraits and the Nikon 50mm 1.4 (not happy)
Page <<first <prev 6 of 6
Aug 11, 2015 20:34:05   #
wj cody Loc: springfield illinois
 
hello,
coming in late on this, but here goes. the reason for large maximum apertures is simply the ability, when looking through the camera or digital imaging device in dim light, to gather as much light through the viewfinder, thereby making it easier to focus.

"fast' lenses are not necessarily better ones. hence the 180mm leitz f3.4 versus the 180m f2.8 nikkor.

the reader who stated the 85-105mm focal length for protraits is pretty much correct. leitz specified 60-65mm for the 35mm format.

Reply
Aug 18, 2015 10:37:26   #
Scubie Loc: Brunswick Georgia
 
First of all, try a 105 mm...it does not flatten the image as much: but you did quite well.
streetmarty wrote:
In my new quest to go from street photographer to grand-daughter photographer I'm about to throw in the towel. I did the research on the Nikon 50mm 1.8 and 1.4 on our site and on Google etc. The main concern was, is the 1.4 worth an extra two hundred bucks. Most said not really but I also read a few articles that said yes. My thought was I wanted to take a lot of natural light shots of a baby so why not get all the light I can? After about a few hundred pictures out of focus to my eye, which means 99% of the viewing world say, oh what a great picture, the 1%, you and I, say, hey that's out of focus! So after re-reading the manual and trying every possible combination humanly possible and getting nowhere I came across "focus shift and spherical aberration". Well there's some information I could have used earlier! OK so I get it now, I think, the lens is weak wide open. Very frustrating process. I just want to be able to take a picture from two feet away and have both eyes in focus without having to go back to college. Now the question becomes when if ever will I shoot wide open, knowing in the back of my mind there will probably be issues? Attached are two pictures, both taken on a tripod with Nikon D610 for your analysis. Photo #1 1.4 ISO 220 #2 5.6 ISO 2800. Thank you for any and all input. Marty
In my new quest to go from street photographer to ... (show quote)

Reply
Aug 23, 2015 05:19:31   #
rpavich Loc: West Virginia
 
streetmarty wrote:
I did not know this. What would you shoot at 1.4, if anything? Thank you for the help.


I'd use the 1.4 to shoot in very low light. That's what it's good for.

The reality is; close up (within 3 feet or less) a 1.4 aperture is pretty dang shallow and not necessary in ample light or flash.

The other reality is that few lenses are tack sharp wide open at 1.4...that's just life.

Stop that thing down to f/2 or f/2.4 or 2.8 and you'll feel better about it.


I've had ever Canon L lens under the sun and I can tell you that the $2000 50mm f/1.2L is even worse wide open. It's soft and focus shifts like the desert wind.


Get close, stop down, and get near a nice large window for some soft side light.

Reply
 
 
Aug 23, 2015 23:28:37   #
CaptainC Loc: Colorado, south of Denver
 
YOU CAN take portraits with a f/1.4 lens wide open. You have to be careful, get the eyes very close to being on the same plane, and do not get TOOOOOO close.

To suggest you cannot use it wide open is not correct, but you will get some OOF images if the person moves out of the DOF plane!

Here are some from a recent session - all at 1.4. The first one is with the Sigma 50mm f/1.4 Art lens, the other three with the Nikkor 85mm f/1.4G.

I had a couple where she moved just a touch after focus and one eye is JUST not quite sharp.

50mm @ f/1.4
50mm @ f/1.4...







Reply
Aug 27, 2015 12:48:48   #
henrycrafter Loc: Orem Utah
 
For portraits with my T5i I generally use EFS 18-55 lens ISO-200 f11@125

Reply
Page <<first <prev 6 of 6
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Photo Analysis
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.