Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Photo Analysis
The Focus is not sharp. Why?
Page <<first <prev 4 of 4
Mar 28, 2012 19:34:38   #
cawanua
 
Minceymomof9 wrote:
I agree that though there might be some problems with the "foggy condition", this shot is not sharp because of motion. If you look close at the pict, there is not one thing in correct focus. I also feel that some of the lights and the flag pole running through the foreground are a bit distracting. I am currently in a mentor program. We set and critique A LOT of photos, both good and bad, and he tries to have me figure out what kinds of things that could have been done to make them better. Distractions (lack of a good composure) are things that come up a lot. Just my thoughts, for what they're worth. I NEVER mean to offend. BTW, when did you take that shot?
I was in DC all week last week (3/19-3/24). A group of 30 adults took 31 8th graders on a field trip from Tuttle, OK to there. It was an AWESOME trip. I want to go back with the teacher by herself. She is the only one that can keep up with me. lol. Soooooo much to see.
I agree that though there might be some problems w... (show quote)


No offense taken in your critique. Neither of the two pictures I posted were well composed. Since you were there, you may remember that Saturday the 24th was rainy and cold....especially if you got wet. I took those shots near the hotel. They were the first opportunity I came accross. Because of the conditions, I was going for mood, nevertheless, I wanted good focus and no noise.

Reply
Mar 28, 2012 20:19:16   #
Meives Loc: FORT LAUDERDALE
 
cawanua wrote:
I used a tripod and the shudder release timer so that I would not have to touch the camera. I isn't quite as clear as I think it should be with all that effort. I'm using auto focus. Have to because eyes are not good enough for manual. Any diagnosis? Any suggestions?
Thanks, Cawanua


Here are the specs.



Reply
Mar 28, 2012 20:57:53   #
Starlet Loc: Las Cruces, New Mexico
 
Could it be partly due to the two big lights in foreground of the image? I don't know, just wondering because I am learning too.
cawanua wrote:
:lol: Perhaps you're right. I felt like I was missing some important technical information that would solve the problem.
Cawanua

Reply
 
 
Mar 28, 2012 21:16:58   #
cawanua
 
Meives wrote:
cawanua wrote:
I used a tripod and the shudder release timer so that I would not have to touch the camera. I isn't quite as clear as I think it should be with all that effort. I'm using auto focus. Have to because eyes are not good enough for manual. Any diagnosis? Any suggestions?
Thanks, Cawanua


Here are the specs.


Yep, that's it alright. I'm not too good with the technical stuff but I've learned from others that my settings were off.

Thanks for your post.
Cawanua

Reply
Mar 28, 2012 21:19:45   #
cawanua
 
Starlet wrote:
Could it be partly due to the two big lights in foreground of the image? I don't know, just wondering because I am learning too.
cawanua wrote:
:lol: Perhaps you're right. I felt like I was missing some important technical information that would solve the problem.
Cawanua


I guess so. Especially if they distracted the camera's focus. I should have focused on the straight lines of the building. I don't think I was that selective.

Reply
Mar 28, 2012 21:21:00   #
Starlet Loc: Las Cruces, New Mexico
 
Somehow, I missed reading some of the hogs suggestions and tips. I guess I am not feeling very good but could not resist getting one the hog. STAR I love the misty view and keep shooting and have fun!
cawanua wrote:
Meives wrote:
cawanua wrote:
I used a tripod and the shudder release timer so that I would not have to touch the camera. I isn't quite as clear as I think it should be with all that effort. I'm using auto focus. Have to because eyes are not good enough for manual. Any diagnosis? Any suggestions?
Thanks, Cawanua


Here are the specs.


Yep, that's it alright. I'm not too good with the technical stuff but I've learned from others that my settings were off.

Thanks for your post.
Cawanua
quote=Meives quote=cawanua I used a tripod and t... (show quote)

Reply
Mar 29, 2012 18:33:38   #
earlst
 
I have had this type off problem, and I found that if I turned of image stabilizer it cleared up.

Reply
 
 
Mar 29, 2012 19:24:59   #
cawanua
 
earlst wrote:
I have had this type off problem, and I found that if I turned of image stabilizer it cleared up.


Earlst, I certainly got that message loud and clear about the image stablelizer. If I every get one, I'll remember. Thanks for the suggestion.
Cawanua

Reply
Mar 31, 2012 00:37:17   #
ziggykor Loc: East Texas
 
Looking at this I suspect that there's more than motion blur at work. If auto focus was used I'd guess that it was fooled and the subject was just never in sharp focus. Course I've been wrong before.

What I would suggest for every photographer is that when shooting in low light with the camera on a tripod, why not fovus manually?

Another issue that I may have missed in this thread is whether the center post was extended. Had that been done, you've just turned a tripod into a monopod and amplified an already shakey situation.

Lastly there's Murphy and his law. Murphy only rears his ugly head and shows himself to photographers when the image being made is very important.

Reply
Mar 31, 2012 00:59:31   #
liveeasy Loc: Manassas, VA.
 
PhotoArtsLA wrote:
The image has motion blur. If you were using a tripod, this is called "coffee nerves." Many tripods cannot handle longer exposures, below 1/60th, like 1/2 second. Even IF you do everything right, the tripod is jiggled in a subtle way, from people walking nearby, hands on the camera, the camera shutter itself, the breeze or wind, and so forth. I own a Manfrotto, for example, where the legs alone cost $300. Another $150-$200 for a ball head, and this is a bright day tripod only. It has awful coffee nerves and cannot be used for longer exposures, and even when using mirror lockup and self timer, standing 8 feet away, motionless as the shutter fires is far from the best tripod choice for night shoots.

When you, usually after wasting many hundreds of dollars, find a tripod with all good habits, it's bliss. My ancient and heavy Gitzo Tele Studex Giant, no longer made, is one such tripod. You'd need an Abrams Tank bumping into it to create anything resembling coffee nerves, and though not recommended, you can do pull-ups on it. I have place half million dollar movie cameras on it, ten feet in the air. This is a BIG tripod. My custom made, gorgeously massive jib (which could easily tip a car, strength wise) is custom made to use this Gitzo.
The image has motion blur. If you were using a tri... (show quote)


Well writen to the point. You answered my question as well. I was not to happy with my Tripod. :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

Reply
Apr 18, 2012 21:29:06   #
loyalpentaxfan Loc: South Carolina
 
nikon_jon wrote:


If you were using an image stabilization lens, it needs to be turned off when you are using it on a tripod.[/quote]

Jon, what's the reason for turning off the IS when using a tripod? I don't have that kind of lens, but your advice seems doesn't seem logical to me ...

Reply
Page <<first <prev 4 of 4
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Photo Analysis
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.