Bugs, Spiders, and Flies - Oh My....
Jul 1, 2015 20:49:53 #
Nikonian72 wrote:
Thanks for the link Douglass. Really appreciate it.Two of William Banik's macro set-ups: http://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-32754-5.html#3705363
Jul 1, 2015 22:54:24 #
LoneRangeFinder wrote:
Thank you Allen - Macro-venture are the best ventures. I as I get more and more images under my belt I enjoy documenting the shots as well. Mark Twain, I am not, but I do hope that my notes will prove fruitful when my mind forgets the details.William: Wonderful series-- but as usual, your narrative adds a lot to help us all experience your "macro-ventures".
Absolutely love the story of coaxing out the Jumper. If you don't already, you should write professionally.
Absolutely love the story of coaxing out the Jumper. If you don't already, you should write professionally.
Jul 1, 2015 22:57:27 #
oldtigger wrote:
Thanks OT - MP-E is my favorite field lens but every now and then I wish it would back out.... 1:5 and it would be as close to perfect as a field closeup/macro lens could get. I have to admit the Venus piques my interest but I can't justify it with so many other things I'd like to get...Great set and write-ups. Agree on the MP-E, a 1:1.5 would be nice.
Jul 1, 2015 22:58:25 #
tinusbum wrote:
Thanks Tom, likewise I always look forward to what's going on in Beast Texas ;-)always look forward to your posts and as usual this one did not disappoint.good job!
Jul 1, 2015 23:01:14 #
napabob wrote:
Thanks Bob, I didn't realize these were a problem until I started researching the sharpshooter for ID purposes. It's too bad they are such a pest as they are lovely bugs...lovely series........I see the signs often, expressing the importance of keeping the glassy wing out of the county here for obvious reasons
Jul 1, 2015 23:02:08 #
Nikonian72 wrote:
Thanks for the lofty sentiments Douglass... I have a very long way to go before I start nipping at Kurt's heels.You are giving Kurt a bit of competition! Well done. :thumbup:
Jul 1, 2015 23:05:38 #
Flyextreme wrote:
Thanks Bill - I've been working that darned concave concept for a couple years. About time I started to get a handle on it. I've got a system down where I can make a new hardbox in a couple hours. Seems like I make a new one every couple of weeks trying to account for deficiencies I find as I use them. If you ever need an old prototype let me know I must have 20 of 'em.William, it looks like you are getting the concave lighting squared away. The reflection in the Jumpers eyes and these outstanding results seem to confirm that. Outstanding work in every regard Sir :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:
Jul 1, 2015 23:06:12 #
EnglishBrenda wrote:
Thank you Brenda, so very kind of you.Wonderful work, just wonderful.
Jul 1, 2015 23:06:52 #
Jul 1, 2015 23:12:17 #
naturepics43 wrote:
Thank you NP, I do appreciate your comments. Yeah the 150 on tubes is an attempt to get closeup abilities, decent working distance and high magnification (2:1) in one package. At times it works like a charm. Other times I know the tubes are taking away from one of the main strengths of the lens, excellent working distance. I look forward to seeing your results with the TC. I have a Canon 250D and 500D (high end diopters) I want to field the 150 with those but need to fashion a lens hood first.Outstanding series. I enjoyed my morning coffee while viewing these super images and reading your great commentary. I noted your frustration when using the 150-mm macro with tubes & potential subjects just out of reach. I've been experimenting using a 2x TC just for this reason. A little early to confirm consistent results. Again, great post. Thanks for sharing.
Jul 1, 2015 23:26:44 #
randave2001 wrote:
Dave, Thank you very much for the kind remarks. I found the it ironic the the borer wasn't on the cotton wood too. I do hope to spot more of those as there are more angles I want to photograph. Jumpers are clever critters have to stay a step ahead of the game with those guys, at least I do.I have seen a lot of very fine macro work being do... (show quote)
Both the flashes you have are excellent. The MT-24EX is best suited for shorter focal lengths. I have used on my 105mm with good results. That said I hang the diffuser over the end of the lens or cocked up at the edge of the lens. I have a 180mm to and the power of the flash isn't strong enough for small aperture ~f/11 and up 1:1 photography. I think it would be fine fill light in closeup work though.
600EX-RT is an excellent flash and the one I use more often then not. Only gotcha with it is the weight... You need a large diffuser face to optimize it. 6x8 would be a minimum size for me. For your 180 you'll want the flash diffuser as close to the end of the lens as you can get it. Douglass posted a link to my setup, that's an old one with the 430EX-II. My 600 is almost identical. When shooting with the 180mm the diffuser will almost always be facing up towards the subject. If you have any specific questions do not hesitate to ask here or post a separate topic. We have many experienced shooters who are well versed in the art of diffused flash for macro photography.
Jul 1, 2015 23:27:27 #
raymondh wrote:
Thank you very much Raymond.Commentary - :thumbup:
Shooting specs - :thumbup:
Images - :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:
Shooting specs - :thumbup:
Images - :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:
Jul 2, 2015 03:14:11 #
A-PeeR wrote:
I have a few ideas to try if I can ever find time to make it happen :|Thanks Bill - I've been working that darned concave concept for a couple years. About time I started to get a handle on it. I've got a system down where I can make a new hardbox in a couple hours. Seems like I make a new one every couple of weeks trying to account for deficiencies I find as I use them. If you ever need an old prototype let me know I must have 20 of 'em.
Jul 2, 2015 05:41:49 #
William, these shots are all amazing and very sharp. I also enjoyed your narrative to go along with the shots. By the way I would love to see a picture of your DIY Hardbox used to take these shots. Again, well done.
Jul 2, 2015 10:54:55 #
A-PeeR wrote:
I would love to have a 600EX battery pack screwed to camera base-plate, controller in hotshoe and a separate light weight flash-head for incorporation in my softbox creations....The MT-24EX is best suited for shorter focal lengths. I have used on my 105mm with good results. I have a 180mm to and the power of the flash isn't strong enough for small aperture ~f/11 and up 1:1 photography. I think it would be fine fill light in closeup work though. 600EX-RT is an excellent flash and the one I use more often then not. Only gotcha with it is the weight. You need a large diffuser face to optimize it. 6x8 would be a minimum size.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.