jim quist Loc: Missouri

I have since read some other posts before deciding to post this, but it still goes to show that some people look for the negative instead of the full beauty of a situation.

A member was referred to as a rosebud. He immediately goes to the urban dictionary and assumes that is what was referred to.

I remembered an episode on the Dick van Dyke show where his son wanted to know why his middle name was Rosebud. here is the episode

http://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=youtube+richie+rosebud+&go=Submit&qs=n&form=QBVR&pq=youtube+richie+rosebud+&sc=0-0&sp=-1&sk=#view=detail&mid=82702DC016F83C1D2FF082702DC016F83C1D2FF0

Just goes to show that some on here are critical of everything and instead of seeing the true beauty of a photo, then can't get past their personal self-critical insecurities.

Manglesphoto Loc: 70 miles south of St.Louis

IM not sure what you are talking about, But when photos are posted in this section you should expect a truthful critique of the image , be it a rave review or a pan. When I post I hope for a truthful critique, if I have missed something in in the taking of the image or in post like dirt specks. blown out highlights or improper cropping I want to hear about it.

dljen Loc: Central PA

You're putting forward a poor argument. Did the member post a picture of a rosebud? You state he was referred to as a rosebud. I have no idea what that means or care but it's not normal to call a man, "Rosebud."