Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
remote sensors
Page <prev 2 of 2
Jun 26, 2015 10:57:58   #
moonhawk Loc: Land of Enchantment
 
My one gripe with my D810 is that it doesn't use the ML-L3 wireless that works on my D7100, which has front and back sensors. I use it for wildflower portraits or anytime I want to minimize vibration when on a tripod. It works brilliantly for what it is, and is cheap. Nikon should use it on all their cameras, and have front and back sensors.

For long range, or non line of sight work, of course there are the alternatives others have mentioned.

Reply
Jun 26, 2015 11:16:35   #
Hfuhruhurr Loc: Arizona
 
dcampbell52 wrote:
Some (Nikon for one) put a single sensor (front) on some, and dual (front and rear) on others D7100 and none on some. I will say that the infrared wireless remote sensor is not all that great. ...
http://www.vellogear.com/listing?category=17772


I agree. I have tried many different remote releases with different cameras, and short of a wired release, the Vello is the most reliable and useful. I use the Vello with my D600 and Sony a6000 using the appropriate cable. It is a little bulky and I wish it would work without the dangling cable, but it is a good compromise.

Donn

Reply
Jun 26, 2015 11:33:48   #
Madman Loc: Gulf Coast, Florida USA
 
dcampbell52 wrote:
Some (Nikon for one) put a single sensor (front) on some, and dual (front and rear) on others D7100 and none on some. I will say that the infrared wireless remote sensor is not all that great. I have aD7100 and when I want to go wireless remote, I use the Vello which is 2.4 gh and has a range of about 100 yards or so. It also has a removable and interchangable connector that plugs into the cameras (different models use different cables but the 2.4 gh sensor can be used on most cameras if you get the apropriate cable. I have one on my D7100 and an aditional remote for my D70s. The sensor supports 2 sec delay release, continuous release and bulb / Manual release (which I use most of the time for timed exposure) The camera can be set to manual or any of the shutter / shooting modes with it. Many Nikon models also can use the wi-fi (cell phone) adapter, which allows your cell phone / tablet to act as a tethered release. With the wi-fi adapter and the free app on your Android or Apple phone, you can see the image on your phone and control many or all of the camera features from the phone. I also have this but have found that the Vello gets used more than the wi-fi as it uses the battery much faster than the Vello. The Vellow is about $40-$70 with other models above for more money and the wi-fi is about $40 and may be built-in to newer model Nikon cameras. I am sure but don't know that Canon has a similar wi-fi and I do know that Vello is available for Canon and other cameras as well as Nikon (and uses the same sensor but just needs the apropriate connection cable). The Vello automatically codes its self to the remote release that you carry and there are about 16,000,000 chanels so you probably aren't going to have that other photographer triggering your stuff like some remote triggers do. I have the DC-N2 which is good enough for my purposes.
http://www.vellogear.com/listing?category=17772
Some (Nikon for one) put a single sensor (front) o... (show quote)


I have the same device and recommend it highly.

Reply
 
 
Jun 26, 2015 11:39:29   #
SHLeM52 Loc: Jacksonville, FL
 
jerryc41 wrote:
I like the Yongnou because it has two identical units, and each can be used as the remote.

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B004YTCNJY/ref=ask_ql_qh_dp_hza


I,ve been using the Yougnou RF-603CII-C1 for some time now. Haven't had a problem yet. Just make sure you get the updated one for your camera (Canon has 2 different models). The updated model has the locking ring that the 603C does not have, so it won't slide out of the hotshoe. At $30 a pair, they won't break the bank for sure.

Reply
Jun 26, 2015 19:23:22   #
lamiaceae Loc: San Luis Obispo County, CA
 
bull drink water wrote:
a pox on camera makers who only put a remote sensor on the front of the camera.


RF is better. Ignore your built in system and go RF. Or at least use a release with a cable. The IR trigger engineers must think we are all SmartPhone narcissists.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 2
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.