Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Check out Commercial and Industrial Photography section of our forum.
Main Photography Discussion
Help with purchasing zoom lens
Page <prev 2 of 2
Jun 25, 2015 09:19:08   #
ralphc4176 Loc: Conyers, GA
 
You didn't mention your brand. I have often used www.keh.com to purchase used photographic equipment with very good results. They currently have a 400 mm f/2.8 USM in EX condition for $3400, or in f/4.0 DO IS USM in LN- condition for $3800, or an f/5.6 USM in LN- condition for $1120. The former two are GEL lenses; the last one has a 77 mm filter size.
There are similar lenses in manufacturer and non-manufacturer brands for most popular cameras.

Reply
Jun 25, 2015 11:20:18   #
Don Fischer Loc: Antelope, Ore
 
I'd get something that overlaps what you have. With a 300mm max right now, there's probably no reason to go longer, unless it's for some type of specialty, probably not. Where I'd go is something like an 18-105 or even 18-140. With the 18-105 you get the overlap between 70 and 105mm. in that range you don't have a nee to change the lens. the 18-105, or what ever is similar in your brand camera, would probably be the lens used mostly and it's a bit smaller and lighter to carry.

Reply
Jun 25, 2015 11:42:29   #
SteveR Loc: Michigan
 
Gene51 wrote:
You need to provide cost, purpose (subject material), and what support you have or are planning to purchase. You need to include $800 or more for a decent tripod and head for longer lenses.


Gene....I purchased a Manfrotto 055xprob with a pistol grip head for $495. It's more than sturdy for a 300mm. It's stout. Plus, 300mm's are shot handheld at sporting events. I have a friend who shoots a Canon 100-400L on Antelope Island both hand held and car door supported and she gets great shots....with, ofc, great light.

For the really long lenses I'd use a gimbal head.

Reply
 
 
Jun 25, 2015 13:06:29   #
PNagy Loc: Missouri City, Texas
 
PNagy wrote:
You did not say if you are shooting Canon or Nikon, but their lens lineups are similar. I have Canon.

If by new you mean something of a shorter focal length, the 24-70mm F2.8 lens will cover your near-wide angle needs. The Version II is more expensive. Version I may be available for considerably less, yet still give you a great lens.

If you meant something above 300mm, you have two choices:

1. Canon 100-400mm F4.5-5.6 IS. I do not have that lens, but birders swear by it. It sells for $2,199.99 at Best Buy online.

2. Canon 200-400mm F4 IS with built in 1.4X extender. The lens is faster than the 100-400mm, but far more expensive at $10,999.99.

3. Canon 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 IS. This is a single lens that would cover nearly the entire focal range between what you already have and the 24-70MM lens. There is not other single lens that covers so wide a focal range from near wide angle to decent super zoom, but it is rather heavy. It is available at B&H for $2,449.00.
You did not say if you are shooting Canon or Nikon... (show quote)


I meant three choices.

Reply
Jun 25, 2015 13:08:36   #
dsmeltz Loc: Philadelphia
 
PNagy wrote:
I meant three choices.


Is there a Monty Python sketch coming? :wink:

Reply
Jun 25, 2015 13:34:21   #
CraigFair Loc: Santa Maria, CA.
 
holiday1955 wrote:
I have a 70/300 mm lens and want to know what the next size zoom would be after the 70/300mm and where to purchase this lens at a reasonable price. Recommendations on other affordable lens would be appreciated as well.

The Tamron 150-600mm is the next step up for you.
The Sigma is back order for quite sometime to come.
$1069.00 on eBay, Amazon, Adorama, B&H all day long.
Craig

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 2
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out Traditional Street and Architectural Photography section of our forum.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.