I finally had an opportunity to practice somewhere other than the backyard. Please comment good or bad.
Thanks
They all seem a bit under-exposed on my monitor. I like #16 (red and yellow flower) the best. The illumination seems a bit strong. Are you using a softbox?
Curve_in wrote:
They all seem a bit under-exposed on my monitor.
Same here: looks underexposed.
I do not mind the over-all, slightly dark exposures. Especially on the white flowers. I do notice the lighting appears a bit directional, not diffused. What is your illumination source?
Since the majority of us are not familiar with these wildflowers, we do not know if these are close-up photos or macro-photographs. The one photo of a long-legged fly does give us some scale. Whenever possible, try to include an ant, or a typical insect, so we know a tiny flower when we see one.
Your practice will pay-off. Keep shooting!
You have LOTS of pixels. Do not hesitate to crop to show detail captured. You will also notice a very narrow DoF when you are at or near MFD. Here is a crop of image #2, which reveals very tiny Thrips on your flower:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ThripsExif image #2:
Camera Model: Canon EOS REBEL T3i
Lens: EF100mm f/2.8 Macro USM
Image Date: 2015-06-06
Focal Length: 100mm
Aperture:
/16.0Exposure Time: 0.0050 s (
1/200)
ISO equiv:
400Exposure Bias: none
Metering Mode: Matrix
Exposure: Manual
Exposure Mode: Manual
White Balance: Auto
Flash Fired: Yes
Wow, you have been busy with a lovely selection of flowers and nicely done. I like the third best of that particular flower as the focus is nice. The 11th. where the fly has a drop of spittle with a refracted image within it is really cool.
Curve_in wrote:
The illumination seems a bit strong. Are you using a softbox?
Thanks, just the pop up flash for now.
Nikonian72 wrote:
What is your illumination source?
Just using the pop up for now, I should have a speedligt in about two weeks.
Nikonian72 wrote:
Since the majority of us are not familiar with these wildflowers, we do not know if these are close-up photos or macro-photographs. The one photo of a long-legged fly does give us some scale. Whenever possible, try to include an ant, or a typical insect, so we know a tiny flower when we see one.
The white flower is about the size of a nickel, the cluster in #21 are about 1/4 inch diameter.
EnglishBrenda wrote:
Wow, you have been busy with a lovely selection of flowers and nicely done. I like the third best of that particular flower as the focus is nice. The 11th. where the fly has a drop of spittle with a refracted image within it is really cool.
Thank you. #3 had fallen from the plant and was lying among leaves in a stump.
I do and I will. I should have a speedlight in two weeks. A gift for the 35th wedding anniversary.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.