Recent Peer Reviewed Intelligent Design Paper Exposes Serious Flaws In Evolution Theory
Jun 6, 2015 03:13:38 #
Jun 6, 2015 03:25:13 #
Race,
He is off the grid too.
"Behe is best known for his argument for irreducible complexity (IC), which argues that some biochemical structures are too complex to be explained by known evolutionary mechanisms and are therefore probably the result of intelligent design. Behe has testified in several court cases related to intelligent design, including the court case Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District that resulted in a ruling that intelligent design was religious in nature.
Behe's claims about the irreducible complexity of essential cellular structures have been rejected by the vast majority of the scientific community, and his own biology department at Lehigh University published an official statement opposing Behe's views and intelligent design."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Behe
btw, Peer reviewed does not in this case mean Peer approved.
He is off the grid too.
"Behe is best known for his argument for irreducible complexity (IC), which argues that some biochemical structures are too complex to be explained by known evolutionary mechanisms and are therefore probably the result of intelligent design. Behe has testified in several court cases related to intelligent design, including the court case Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District that resulted in a ruling that intelligent design was religious in nature.
Behe's claims about the irreducible complexity of essential cellular structures have been rejected by the vast majority of the scientific community, and his own biology department at Lehigh University published an official statement opposing Behe's views and intelligent design."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Behe
btw, Peer reviewed does not in this case mean Peer approved.
Jun 6, 2015 03:32:43 #
Racmanaz
Loc: Sunny Tucson!
ArtzDarkroom wrote:
Race, br He is off the grid too. br br "Behe... (show quote)
Again, many great minds were off the grid, you will find soon that Behe is right and has been proven to be right. It's funny, atheists\evolutionists used to always make a big deal about Peer Review and asked em to provide papers to support ID theories and when I did, they dismissed it as authentic and now they NEVER ask me for Peer review papers LOLOLOL
Jun 6, 2015 03:35:01 #
Racmanaz
Loc: Sunny Tucson!
ArtzDarkroom wrote:
Race, br He is off the grid too. br br "Behe... (show quote)
keep in mind, Neo darwinian evolution is not scientifically based and can not be supported by real science. Neo darwinian evolution can not be observed, tested or repeated, it can't even be studied because it does not exist. You claim you know scientific history about off the grid scientists but you are showing your ignorance on this one as well. :)
Jun 6, 2015 03:38:40 #
The whole point of having one's work reviewed by peers is to convince them of one's authenticity. When somebody doest that, they are applauded and sometimes win awards. When their work does not hold up under scrutiny it is because the work is shabby. That is what has happened to this fella. He could NOT convince his colleagues of his opinion because after they looked at his work they saw flaws in it. That is why being reviewed by ones peers is important, because they are the most qualified to examine the work. More qualified than you or I.
Racmanaz wrote:
Again, many great minds were off the grid, you will find soon that Behe is right and has been proven to be right. It's funny, atheists\evolutionists used to always make a big deal about Peer Review and asked em to provide papers to support ID theories and when I did, they dismissed it as authentic and now they NEVER ask me for Peer review papers LOLOLOL
Jun 6, 2015 03:43:58 #
Racmanaz
Loc: Sunny Tucson!
ArtzDarkroom wrote:
The whole point of having one's work reviewed by p... (show quote)
There are more ID papers being published in Peer Review as of late, they are finally opening up to a viable alternative theory as ID. You can deny all you want Artz, ID is gaining ground and fast. Behe has many colleagues that are supporting his publications and views, you have not been watching my video posts have you? lol why are you and others so afraid that people will read and believe the theory of ID? Because you and others fear that it will damage the already failing theory of Darwinian evolution :)
Jun 6, 2015 03:50:48 #
I am so seriously invested in Science and Evolution and all the training, facts and data that I have been brainwashed with at the University that for me to watch those videos my make my whole world crumble. So many professors and scientists with PhDs have lied to me. Just because they taught theories approved by others, many, many others I am too weak and ill-informed to make up my own mind so I believe them... 8-)
Racmanaz wrote:
There are more ID papers being published in Peer R... (show quote)
Jun 6, 2015 03:53:24 #
Racmanaz
Loc: Sunny Tucson!
ArtzDarkroom wrote:
I am so seriously invested in Science and Evolution and all the training, facts and data that I have been brainwashed with at the University that for me to watch those videos my make my whole world crumble. So many professors and scientists with PhDs have lied to me. Just because they taught theories approved by others, many, many others I am too weak and ill-informed to make up my own mind so I believe them... 8-)
Just follow the light my friend, follow the light...lol ;)
Jun 6, 2015 03:58:27 #
I just posted this image by my son, with this caption. What a coincidence... lol
Racmanaz wrote:
Just follow the light my friend, follow the light...lol ;)
Jun 6, 2015 12:02:01 #
Racmanaz wrote:
There are more ID papers being published in Peer R... (show quote)
Could you please provide citations for these "more ID papers" that are purportedly being published through peer review processes. I am intimately familiar with this process,having fought for several years to have my work published in peer reviewed journals. At each submission, reviewers pointed out flaws in my reasoning or experimental design. Eventually the work was published, and is now taught a standard concept in my field. I would like to see the supposed ID papers that have survived this same intellectual gauntlet.
Jun 6, 2015 12:26:51 #
OldDoc wrote:
Could you please provide citations for these "... (show quote)
the trouble with "peer" reviewed intelligent design papers is that you have to find a bunch of religious whackos to read your paper.
Jun 6, 2015 12:52:47 #
Does anyone have the citation to this "recent" paper by Behe. The most recent I can find in QRB is several years old. Am I missing something, or is this just a case of pretending that there is something new in very old stuff?
Jun 6, 2015 13:04:18 #
If you wade through the comments, you will find hoards of Racmaniacs professing their ignorance..parading it, just like he does!!!!!!!!!!!
shocking! they BREED!!!!!!!!
shocking! they BREED!!!!!!!!
Jun 6, 2015 13:15:46 #
Racmanaz
Loc: Sunny Tucson!
green wrote:
the trouble with "peer" reviewed intelligent design papers is that you have to find a bunch of religious whackos to read your paper.
Or find a bunch of evolutionist whackos who are FEARFUL that ID might gain too much ground in Peer Reviewed science publications. Why are you evolutionist/atheists so scared of opposition to your theory?? Are you afraid people will finally have a choice to see evidence on the contrary? I am for both Darwinian evolution and Intelligent Design to be debated in Peer Review scientific journals, you atheists/Darwinian evolutions have too much fear built into your religion. Now before you get all bent out of shape and scream RELIGION!!, I'm not talking about the biblical account of Creation, I am talking about the science behind the ID theory, it has nothing to do with Creation or religion. So what are you so afraid of? You should be welcoming the ID theory with open arms if ID is false because in your mind you could expose it for it's "failures" that you seem to think it has. You don't want ID to be part of the science because you fear that people will believe it over Darwinian Evolution. You are fearful to give people a choice to believe what they might thing is a better explanation of the origin of life and life in general. Atheists remind me a lot about Hitler, control the masses and you control their thoughts.
Jun 6, 2015 13:18:55 #
Racmanaz wrote:
Or find a bunch of evolutionist whackos who are FE... (show quote)
Rac here's a challenge for both of us...
You find 5 technologies based on creationism or intelligent design and I'll find 5 technologies based on Evolution theory.
Technology works in the real world, and is basically the best possible proof we can have here on earth of a theory... so do you accept my challenge?
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.