Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Photo Critique Section
Cute bird
Jun 1, 2015 11:28:55   #
djtravels Loc: Georgia boy now
 
Took a detour driving home yesterday morning and my wife spotted this scissor-tailed bird. He landed on a rather heavy cable and I shot him. Interested in your thoughts as to my composition after cropping to this. Pleased to hear from y'all. I used PSE12 and a couple of Topaz plug-ins, including deNoise. djt

cropped bird
cropped bird...
(Download)

Reply
Jun 1, 2015 12:06:27   #
R.G. Loc: Scotland
 
Having the eye obscured is a bit of a negative. Whatever else the shot might have going for it, it's lacking a vital ingredient.

Reply
Jun 1, 2015 12:14:23   #
Uuglypher Loc: South Dakota (East River)
 
djtravels wrote:
Took a detour driving home yesterday morning and my wife spotted this scissor-tailed bird. He landed on a rather heavy cable and I shot him. Interested in your thoughts as to my composition after cropping to this. Pleased to hear from y'all. I used PSE12 and a couple of Topaz plug-ins, including deNoise. djt


Hi, DJ,
The flycatcher establishes an excellent diagonal base for composition, you captured some good feather detail, but two problems knock this image down from a strictly dispassionate point-of view.
The close crop emphasized an unfortunate amount of noise in the sky ( and noise which also roughs up the feather detail,

And that damned cable he's perched on!
It is a major distraction and worst of all, it hides the eye. Any decent bird image requires that the eye be unequivocally sharp and possessed of a lively "catchlight" ... A specular reflection of the sun or other source of primary illumination.

In the future a longer lens ( requiring less cropping), using a low ISO ( to help minimize noise), and choosing the " moment" when composition is optimal with fewest distractions will pay great dividends re: improved quality of your bird images!

Keep at it and let's see some more!

Dave

Reply
 
 
Jun 1, 2015 16:13:58   #
djtravels Loc: Georgia boy now
 
R.G. wrote:
Having the eye obscured is a bit of a negative. Whatever else the shot might have going for it, it's lacking a vital ingredient.


Right. A big no-no. Thanks for commenting. djt

Reply
Jun 1, 2015 16:17:04   #
djtravels Loc: Georgia boy now
 
In the future a longer lens ( requiring less cropping), using a low ISO ( to help minimize noise), and choosing the " moment" when composition is optimal with fewest distractions will pay great dividends re: improved quality of your bird images!

Keep at it and let's see some more!
I was using an SX50, so I had plenty of zoom. ISO set to 100. I think the noise was self inflicted be me using too much PP. No? Thanks for your time. I WILL keep trying.

:lol: :thumbup:

Reply
Jun 1, 2015 19:34:38   #
Billyspad Loc: The Philippines
 
Your on the same route as me fella. I have never shot birds before and tried a few. God they turned out bad! But it sort of spurred me on so I now sit in the blazing sun at the front of my house with the only long lens I have trying to capture a small brainless feathered thing on my sensor.
No luck so far but I will keep you posted. Best of luck with your quest as well.

Reply
Jun 1, 2015 19:52:49   #
djtravels Loc: Georgia boy now
 
Bet you never posted a bird with his eye(s) obscured. How the hell could I have done that? Maybe I should start giving speeches, or something.

:thumbdown: :thumbdown:

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Photo Critique Section
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.