What If?
Apr 24, 2015 23:58:16 #
OK...what if Hillary really does get elected as president? (I am certainly not wishing this at all.) But what if she does? Don't you think she has enough enemies that they'll continue to dig up the dirt and the focus on the administration will be to defend her? So now we'll have an administration in defense. What good will that do? You know it'll be the daily routine. And when "they" find the smoking gun, she'll be impeached and forced to resign. So in effect you will be voting for the VP as the next POTUS! Think about it!
Apr 25, 2015 00:02:23 #
Pepper
Loc: Planet Earth Country USA
Zophman wrote:
OK...what if Hillary really does get elected as pr... (show quote)
A lot will depend on the make up of the congress. Hopefully she would have to work with a Republican congress and then we'd be in pretty good shape because nothing would get done and when the government does nothing the country benefits.
Apr 25, 2015 00:16:52 #
user47602
Loc: ip 304.0.0.33.32
Pepper wrote:
A lot will depend on the make up of the congress. Hopefully she would have to work with a Republican congress and then we'd be in pretty good shape because nothing would get done and when the government does nothing the country benefits.
EVEN WHEN IT DOES NOTHING... IT'S SPENDING MONEY
Apr 25, 2015 00:18:24 #
Pepper
Loc: Planet Earth Country USA
user47602 wrote:
EVEN WHEN IT DOES NOTHING... IT'S SPENDING MONEY
I know but at least they're not adding more.
Apr 25, 2015 09:51:50 #
Apr 25, 2015 10:12:58 #
Pepper wrote:
I know but at least they're not adding more.
BINGO!
Is there a Democrat alive that can say no to spending?
Apr 25, 2015 10:22:14 #
hondo812 wrote:
BINGO!
Is there a Democrat alive that can say no to spending?
Is there a Democrat alive that can say no to spending?
None that I can think of. Old sheets Byrd was indeed the worst!
Apr 25, 2015 13:26:28 #
Why are y'all worried so much? You have what, 19 people running for president? Surely, you should be able to find someone out of 19. You have more money on your side, when are ya gonna learn that money elects presidents, people do not. Money is the answer to everything.
You can thank your Supreme Court for that.
Remember-Money elects presidents.
You can thank your Supreme Court for that.
Remember-Money elects presidents.
Apr 25, 2015 14:51:29 #
dljen wrote:
Why are y'all worried so much? You have what, 19 people running for president? Surely, you should be able to find someone out of 19. You have more money on your side, when are ya gonna learn that money elects presidents, people do not. Money is the answer to everything.
You can thank your Supreme Court for that.
Remember-Money elects presidents.
You can thank your Supreme Court for that.
Remember-Money elects presidents.
Like labor unions, school unions and federal employee unions.....it's not just a "Republican" thing!
Apr 25, 2015 15:21:42 #
dljen wrote:
Why are y'all worried so much? You have what, 19 people running for president? Surely, you should be able to find someone out of 19. You have more money on your side, when are ya gonna learn that money elects presidents, people do not. Money is the answer to everything.
You can thank your Supreme Court for that.
Remember-Money elects presidents.
You can thank your Supreme Court for that.
Remember-Money elects presidents.
Ah DD, have you not heard the Hildebeast is amassing an impressive 2 1/2 Billion for her presidential run. Undoubtedly with the help of George Soros, Tom Steyer and her Clinton Foundation I'm sure she will be formidable in her campaign donations and the dirty money in politics, thank you Supreme's!
Apr 26, 2015 07:33:56 #
dljen wrote:
Why are y'all worried so much? You have what, 19 people running for president? Surely, you should be able to find someone out of 19. You have more money on your side, when are ya gonna learn that money elects presidents, people do not. Money is the answer to everything.
You can thank your Supreme Court for that.
Remember-Money elects presidents.
You can thank your Supreme Court for that.
Remember-Money elects presidents.
Damn, you are amazingly ignorant and a purposeful liar. It is a FACT that in the last election cycle democrat donors outspent and contributed more to their candidates by a factor of FIVE to ONE (5 to 1) over Republican candidates. In the 2012 election cycle for president obama supporters and donors outspent Romney donors and supporters by a factor of almost TWO to ONE (2 to 1). Those are the FACTS. Easily verifiable. You can have your own opinions Trixie but not your own facts.
Apr 26, 2015 07:53:05 #
SBW wrote:
Damn, you are amazingly ignorant and a purposeful liar. It is a FACT that in the last election cycle democrat donors outspent and contributed more to their candidates by a factor of FIVE to ONE (5 to 1) over Republican candidates. In the 2012 election cycle for president obama supporters and donors outspent Romney donors and supporters by a factor of almost TWO to ONE (2 to 1). Those are the FACTS. Easily verifiable. You can have your own opinions Trixie but not your own facts.
And I just said that money elects presidents so what are you carrying on about? Obama had a lot of small donations when running for president along with the large ones given by millionaires. These aren't "my" facts, I deal with facts.
Apr 26, 2015 07:55:47 #
dljen wrote:
And I just said that money elects presidents so what are you carrying on about? Obama had a lot of small donations when running for president along with the large ones given by millionaires. These aren't "my" facts, I deal with facts.
YOU made the statement that "money was on the Republican side". I was just pointing out that is not true. But as always you are too stupid to see that or take responsibility. Plus, you are a habitual liar.
Apr 26, 2015 08:34:54 #
SBW wrote:
YOU made the statement that "money was on the Republican side". I was just pointing out that is not true. But as always you are too stupid to see that or take responsibility. Plus, you are a habitual liar.
I don't really pay attention to you, you're always whining about something and if someone doesn't agree with you 100%, they're an habitual liar in your opinion. I honestly don't know anyone who cares for your opinion, so what you think means exactly nothing to me.
Apr 26, 2015 09:13:56 #
dljen wrote:
I don't really pay attention to you, you're always whining about something and if someone doesn't agree with you 100%, they're an habitual liar in your opinion. I honestly don't know anyone who cares for your opinion, so what you think means exactly nothing to me.
Must mean something trixe, you keep responding. And you are still a habitual liar. You are not even smart of enough to take responsibility or acknowledge statements YOU make. That is you trixie, put it in black and white and then deny it. You must be retarded.
"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits"... Albert Einstein
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.