Yes, just errors, nothing to see here.
Apr 23, 2015 09:03:37 #
Apr 23, 2015 09:17:32 #
Kombiguy wrote:
http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/04/23/us-usa-election-clinton-taxes-exclusive-idUSKBN0NE0CA20150423?irpc=932
"It was just a typo!", "Right Wing Conspiracy!", "Bush's Fault!".....
Yeah, this stinks to high heaven. It's a shame we don't have a real AG or DOJ. Seems to me that the IRS ought to be auditing with that many "adjustments".
Apr 23, 2015 09:20:01 #
Kombiguy wrote:
http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/04/23/us-usa-election-clinton-taxes-exclusive-idUSKBN0NE0CA20150423?irpc=932
Gee, funny that happened. I wonder what has caused them to take such an "in depth" review of their tax returns? Maybe, just maybe this time the clintons will not get away with their chicanery and lawlessness.
Apr 23, 2015 11:35:56 #
Guess the IRS is broke - ""Sorry , Clintons, we'll just have to trust your honesty in re-filing!"
Another "pass" to the liars.
Another "pass" to the liars.
Apr 23, 2015 11:43:16 #
user47602
Loc: ip 304.0.0.33.32
$6billion is a pittance...
According to the National Priorities Project's CostOfWar.com, a website providing a running tally of the expense incurred by U.S. wars, the cost of the Iraq conflict is now nearly $801 billion. However, when medical and disability claims are included, as well as the cost of replacing equipment and weapons, economists Joseph Stiglitz and Linda Bilmes estimate the eventual cost of the war could be between $4 and $6 trillion, The Christian Science Monitor reports.
According to the National Priorities Project's CostOfWar.com, a website providing a running tally of the expense incurred by U.S. wars, the cost of the Iraq conflict is now nearly $801 billion. However, when medical and disability claims are included, as well as the cost of replacing equipment and weapons, economists Joseph Stiglitz and Linda Bilmes estimate the eventual cost of the war could be between $4 and $6 trillion, The Christian Science Monitor reports.
Apr 23, 2015 11:44:13 #
HEART wrote:
Guess the IRS is broke - ""Sorry , Clintons, we'll just have to trust your honesty in re-filing!"
Another "pass" to the liars.
Another "pass" to the liars.
Interesting, well not really, that the lefties are being silent on this one.
They are probably huddling by the fax machine now to get their spin and talking points. :thumbup:
Apr 23, 2015 11:49:08 #
user47602
Loc: ip 304.0.0.33.32
SBW wrote:
Interesting, well not really, that the lefties are being silent on this one.
They are probably huddling by the fax machine now to get their spin and talking points. :thumbup:
They are probably huddling by the fax machine now to get their spin and talking points. :thumbup:
gee SBW, you see everything in Black & Black.
you don't get it it's NOT left vs right, it's the rich v.s. everyone else... so she's the enemy, but not why you think.
Apr 23, 2015 11:50:40 #
NeilL
Loc: British-born Canadian
Kombiguy wrote:
http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/04/23/us-usa-election-clinton-taxes-exclusive-idUSKBN0NE0CA20150423?irpc=932
That damn internet server malfunctioned again!
Apr 23, 2015 12:27:12 #
user47602 wrote:
$6billion is a pittance...
According to the National Priorities Project's CostOfWar.com, a website providing a running tally of the expense incurred by U.S. wars, the cost of the Iraq conflict is now nearly $801 billion. However, when medical and disability claims are included, as well as the cost of replacing equipment and weapons, economists Joseph Stiglitz and Linda Bilmes estimate the eventual cost of the war could be between $4 and $6 trillion, The Christian Science Monitor reports.
According to the National Priorities Project's CostOfWar.com, a website providing a running tally of the expense incurred by U.S. wars, the cost of the Iraq conflict is now nearly $801 billion. However, when medical and disability claims are included, as well as the cost of replacing equipment and weapons, economists Joseph Stiglitz and Linda Bilmes estimate the eventual cost of the war could be between $4 and $6 trillion, The Christian Science Monitor reports.
Apr 23, 2015 12:28:37 #
user47602 wrote:
gee SBW, you see everything in Black & Black.
you don't get it it's NOT left vs right, it's the rich v.s. everyone else... so she's the enemy, but not why you think.
you don't get it it's NOT left vs right, it's the rich v.s. everyone else... so she's the enemy, but not why you think.
Apr 23, 2015 13:14:11 #
user47602 wrote:
$6billion is a pittance...
No, not really no matter how many times you say that is just not true. Money gone missing from her department while she was in charge and what did she do about it? It matters. Hell yeah it matters! And now this absolute boob in a pant suit wants access to all the money?
Apr 23, 2015 13:17:10 #
user47602
Loc: ip 304.0.0.33.32
hondo812 wrote:
No, not really no matter how many times you say that is just not true. Money gone missing from her department while she was in charge and what did she do about it? It matters. Hell yeah it matters! And now this absolute boob in a pant suit wants access to all the money?
yeah... I guess $6 billion is a lot, just looked at my bank account :lol:
Apr 23, 2015 14:34:34 #
user47602 wrote:
yeah... I guess $6 billion is a lot, just looked at my bank account :lol:
It's not zeros you want in your bank account....it's 9's!
Apr 23, 2015 14:46:28 #
Kombiguy wrote:
http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/04/23/us-usa-election-clinton-taxes-exclusive-idUSKBN0NE0CA20150423?irpc=932
I guess the "underfunded" IRS was to busy chasing conservative 501c3's!
Apr 23, 2015 15:17:15 #
SBW wrote:
Interesting, well not really, that the lefties are being silent on this one.
They are probably huddling by the fax machine now to get their spin and talking points. :thumbup:
They are probably huddling by the fax machine now to get their spin and talking points. :thumbup:
:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.