Judge Napolitano: Bribery Allegations Against Hillary Clinton Are Truly Damning
Apr 21, 2015 15:16:25 #
Judge Napolitano: Bribery Allegations Against Hillary Clinton Are Truly Damning
Article by Alex Griswold / Media Reporter / 10:39 PM 04/20/2015
Fox News senior judicial analyst Judge Andrew Napolitano said on The Kelly File Monday the allegations that former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton exchanged favors in return for donations to the Clinton Foundation are truly damning.
He also said the Obama Justice Department must launch a criminal investigation. (VIDEO: Napolitano: Hillary Clinton Faces Three Years In Jail, Per Document)
Judge Napolitano: These allegations are far more serious than those for which Senator Robert Menendez of New Jersey was indicted. And they essentially form the same type of allegation, a quid pro quo: You give cash to me or someone else on my behalf, and I exercise my official governmental judgment in favor of you.
Now I havent seen the book; we havent seen it. But weve read a version of it in the New York Times or a summary in the New York Times and the allegations are truly damning. They are clearly enough to trigger an investigation. The allegations showed timelines of contributions to the family foundation and decisions made by Mrs Clinton favorable to the contributor. Or contributions to the family foundation and sky-high $500,000 a speech, unheard of in this business speaking fees to her husband. Or contributions to the family foundation and two years later, sky-high speaking fees to Mrs. Clinton. Look, the essence of bribery is the quid pro quo. You do something for me or in my behalf, and I exercise my official governmental powers in favor of you.
Thats what Senator Menendez was indicted for, having to do with visas and Medicare reimbursement. This has to do with the foreign policy and arguably the security of the nation.
KELLY: Youre saying that this is not only potentially unethical, but she may have actually committed felonies while in office?
NAPOLITANO: I am saying that if the version of the book that we have read stands up under scrutiny, the Justice Department must commence a criminal investigation of Mrs Clintons behavior about the time period about which the book is written. I dont know what Peter Schweizer, the author I dont know what his motivation may be But if the evidence is sound there, the Justice Department will have no choice but commence an investigation or endure the mocking the of the legal community that the Justice Department of the United States of America is not there to enforce federal law against a popular they perceive to be popular political figure.
My comments;
As usual, Judge Napolitano is "right on"; also......while many doubt that Obama's DOJ wouldn't lift a hand to "investigate" Hillary and Bill? Don't be too sure about THAT! There is no love lost between these scum-bags! If Barry thinks this thing has the potential to "rub off" on him and his "ilk", he will throw Shrillary under the nearest bus in a New York minute!
Article by Alex Griswold / Media Reporter / 10:39 PM 04/20/2015
Fox News senior judicial analyst Judge Andrew Napolitano said on The Kelly File Monday the allegations that former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton exchanged favors in return for donations to the Clinton Foundation are truly damning.
He also said the Obama Justice Department must launch a criminal investigation. (VIDEO: Napolitano: Hillary Clinton Faces Three Years In Jail, Per Document)
Judge Napolitano: These allegations are far more serious than those for which Senator Robert Menendez of New Jersey was indicted. And they essentially form the same type of allegation, a quid pro quo: You give cash to me or someone else on my behalf, and I exercise my official governmental judgment in favor of you.
Now I havent seen the book; we havent seen it. But weve read a version of it in the New York Times or a summary in the New York Times and the allegations are truly damning. They are clearly enough to trigger an investigation. The allegations showed timelines of contributions to the family foundation and decisions made by Mrs Clinton favorable to the contributor. Or contributions to the family foundation and sky-high $500,000 a speech, unheard of in this business speaking fees to her husband. Or contributions to the family foundation and two years later, sky-high speaking fees to Mrs. Clinton. Look, the essence of bribery is the quid pro quo. You do something for me or in my behalf, and I exercise my official governmental powers in favor of you.
Thats what Senator Menendez was indicted for, having to do with visas and Medicare reimbursement. This has to do with the foreign policy and arguably the security of the nation.
KELLY: Youre saying that this is not only potentially unethical, but she may have actually committed felonies while in office?
NAPOLITANO: I am saying that if the version of the book that we have read stands up under scrutiny, the Justice Department must commence a criminal investigation of Mrs Clintons behavior about the time period about which the book is written. I dont know what Peter Schweizer, the author I dont know what his motivation may be But if the evidence is sound there, the Justice Department will have no choice but commence an investigation or endure the mocking the of the legal community that the Justice Department of the United States of America is not there to enforce federal law against a popular they perceive to be popular political figure.
My comments;
As usual, Judge Napolitano is "right on"; also......while many doubt that Obama's DOJ wouldn't lift a hand to "investigate" Hillary and Bill? Don't be too sure about THAT! There is no love lost between these scum-bags! If Barry thinks this thing has the potential to "rub off" on him and his "ilk", he will throw Shrillary under the nearest bus in a New York minute!
Damn That Damned Judge Napolitano! How Can I Campaign For POTUS With All Of These Pricks Revealing All Of My "Dirt"?
The Hildebeast In One of Her 5,000 Pants Suits? (And With One Of Her Slaves? )
So What If I Got Paid $500,000 To Give A Speech? I Give Great Speeches, You Lowly Peasant!
Apr 21, 2015 15:27:44 #
If it's a threat to national security then wouldn't that be characterized as TREASON?
Apr 22, 2015 13:05:29 #
hondo812 wrote:
If it's a threat to national security then wouldn't that be characterized as TREASON?
IMO, this woman has committed treason many times; her and her useless, philandering "husband" traded highly classified weapons technology to the PRC for "political donations", (aka, "cash" )
Apr 24, 2015 04:33:49 #
Let's be honest. Influence peddling is the name of the game in politics at all levels. Always has been and always will be. The Clinton's Royal Teflon coating may be starting to wear thin. We need 'The Donald' for POTUS and Judith Sheindlin for VP. It would be a helluva cut in pay but I believe they both have enough stashed away for their old age.
Apr 24, 2015 05:44:08 #
Gitzo wrote:
Judge Napolitano: Bribery Allegations Against Hill... (show quote)
===============================
The Hildabeest belongs in prison.
Apr 24, 2015 05:48:45 #
Gitzo wrote:
Judge Napolitano: Bribery Allegations Against Hill... (show quote)
===============================
The Hildabeest belongs in prison.
Shrillary, apt adjective. It fits.
Even for the demoRats it is a new low when she is all they got.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.