National Enquirer Claims Hillary’s Deleted Emails Contained Names Of Numerous Lesbian Lovers

For Western Journalism; / Article by / B. Christopher Agee, April 17, 2015 at 4:44pm




The rumors have dogged her for years.

Hillary Clinton has encountered several roadblocks in the days since announcing her presidential candidacy, many of which stemmed from accusations that she inappropriately used a personal email address to conduct official business during her stint as the head of the U.S. State Department. With reports of numerous emails permanently deleted from her server, speculation continues to swirl within the political realm regarding what she hoped to keep secret.

An exclusive report by the National Enquirer this week attempted to address that issue, citing an anonymous source close to Clinton who claims she is desperately trying to hide names and details about her many lesbian lovers.

While she has faced allegations of extramarital, same-sex affairs in the past, specifically with former staffer Huma Abedin, recent accusations contend Clinton was intimately involved with numerous other women. According to the unnamed authority cited by the Enquirer, though, Clinton is not worried about persistent rumors concerning her sexuality.

“That’s been out for years,” the individual acknowledged, adding that “her real fear is that the names of some of her lovers would be made public.”

The Enquirer obtained descriptions of several of the women to whom Clinton has been linked, including a movie star, a model, and the daughter of “a top government official.”

It was primarily her desire to cover up this information, the source alleged, that prompted her to take the decisive step of erasing a large number of emails. The insider did offer another potential issue Clinton might have hoped to keep under wraps by deleting the files, suggesting evidence exists that on at least one occasion, she accidentally sent a government-related email to one of her lovers instead of its intended recipient.

“That makes you wonder if any sensitive information was sent to her romantic partners,” the source concluded.

Of course, any report based on the testimony of an unnamed source is inherently subject to skepticism – especially when published by an outlet with a reputation for sensationalism. The Enquirer has, however, been responsible for breaking several major stories before more mainstream sources, often on the strength of anonymous informants.

As a couple of prominent examples, reports of Tiger Woods’ affair and Jesse Jackson’s love child first appeared in the pages of the National Enquirer.

Share this article on Facebook if you’d like to know what was in Hillary’s emails.


Should come as no surprise being that she speaks with a forked tongue
My comments;

There have been many people accusing Hillary Clinton of being a lesbian for years and years now; that isn't her big problem; after all, there's certainly no law against being gay. Like the author of this article points out, one of Hillary's big problems will be when some of the names that were on the server that she erased are made public; that's when the real "circus" will start! I have never liked Hillary Clinton, but there was a time that I assumed that she was pretty intelligent; Now I think she's pretty ignorant, and pretty dumb, bordering on outright stupid! Actually, it really doesn't even make any difference what's on the emails that Hillary thinks she destroyed; What Hillary fails to realize, those emails that she "thinks" she destroyed......to start out with, every one of them went "someplace".......there are computers all over creation that have some of these emails still on THEIR hard drives; but the real "biggie"? The N.S,A.; the N.S.A. has copies of every email ever sent, since before Hillary's last name became Clinton! Many people think the House Select Committee already has copies of the incriminating emails; when Hillary is forced to testify before a government committee, then starts lying her butt off, (as Hillary ALWAYS does ), she will then have committed perjury, and that right there will end up putting Hillary behind bars. (Go talk to Martha Stewart, Hillary....ask HER what happens when you start lying while under oath. )

BTW.......Quote; "any report based on the testimony of an unnamed source is inherently subject to skepticism – especially when published by an outlet with a reputation for sensationalism. The Enquirer has, however, been responsible for breaking several major stories before more mainstream sources, often on the strength of anonymous informants.

As a couple of prominent examples, reports of Tiger Woods’ affair and Jesse Jackson’s love child first appeared in the pages of the National Enquirer.

I know every Hillary worshiper will be screaming about "The National Enquire"; Is it a "sleazy source"? about 80% of the time, absolutely! But the "sleazy" National Enquire has a much more "effective" way of gathering "dirt" on people than other, more legitimate spurces do.........they PAY for it! (Often in the millions )