Fine and freaking Dandy@!@!!@
Pepper
Loc: Planet Earth Country USA
I didn't get the 150-500 I got the 50-500 and I love it.
Mine works just fine thank you.
belwj
Loc: Berkshires, Ma
Are you finding it hand holdable? And how are you finding the image sharpness at 500 mm?
Pepper wrote:
I didn't get the 150-500 I got the 50-500 and I love it.
Same here, got the 50-500 Bigma. Very impressed so far. This weekend I hope to try the Bigma at the Sebring Race. The reason I selected the 50-500 over the 150-500 was for the range allowing me to use one lens for things like this race.
Ozzie
Loc: Australia(NSW)
I have the Sigma 50-500mm and the only drawback is that it needs light and lots of it. It's great during the day , but come sunset it gets very slow and is a dead-loss if handheld. I missed some great shots in Africa when we happened upon a lion-kill in the bush. Even the spotlight did'nt help (it was just after sunset) . My husband uses it with great effect (handheld) , but it's a tiny bit heavy for me - I prefer a tripod. But a great all-rounder lens. Good for 50-500 , but the focus is never razor-sharp at the long end. I'm just a little disappointed with it sometimes..pity , because I thought I had the whole range 'in the bag' in one.
Great lens! May drop a bit in sharpness at 500, but with a good tripod it is barely noticeable (I use a Wimberley gimbal head). Rarely try to handhold at 4-500mm unless I have a rest and shutter speedof1/1000th or less. Slow in low light, but a 400mm 2.8 is outside my current budget! :lol:
I bought the Sigma 70-300mm w/macro. it is a great lens, I sacrificed the vibration control for the macro. I realize I can use a tripod or mono pod, but seems to take away the. quick photo old. thinking about trading for one with vibration control. any comments???
Mine is working out great,Little heavy but getting great shots with it even handheld
my problem is that I have a tremor.
belwj
Loc: Berkshires, Ma
Thanks to all for the input.
Jury is still out. Need more time. Need more shots.
Ozzie wrote:
I have the Sigma 50-500mm and the only drawback is that it needs light and lots of it. It's great during the day , but come sunset it gets very slow and is a dead-loss if handheld. I missed some great shots in Africa when we happened upon a lion-kill in the bush. Even the spotlight did'nt help (it was just after sunset) . My husband uses it with great effect (handheld) , but it's a tiny bit heavy for me - I prefer a tripod. But a great all-rounder lens. Good for 50-500 , but the focus is never razor-sharp at the long end. I'm just a little disappointed with it sometimes..pity , because I thought I had the whole range 'in the bag' in one.
I have the Sigma 50-500mm and the only drawback is... (
show quote)
Ozzie,
Do you have the newer OS version, and what camera body are you using?
I did a quick test on my patio, covered with a pool screen with the sun setting through some cloud cover. I did not think the lens would focus well under this condidtion. I was plesantly surprised with the AF in this less than optimum light, little if any "hunting" and the image focus was right on. I was even able to AF @ f11 under these conditions.
This may have been helped with the new Nikon D7000 AF system, I should have tried the test with my older D70. This was of course a very crude test using a front/back focus fixture 40~50' away. But it did instill confidence in the lens.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.