Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Photo Analysis
Tutorial on what NOT to do when taking a panorama:
Mar 11, 2012 13:57:56   #
English_Wolf Loc: Near Pensacola, FL
 
Take one hand-held while showing "how to" in real life, with people listening, it leads to 'accidents' as illustrated:
1) Gun emplacement clipped
2) Slight change of zoom ratio leading to inability to correct the stitching process
3) Did not correct the exposure on that shot
4) General comments:
The vertical alignment was shot in 4,5 and 7
Exposure goes from light to dark and left uncorrected

Conditions:
Overcast changing, hazy
Time: 16:01 (first camera time stamp) to 16:12 (last camera time stamp)

Equipment:
Nikon D300
18~200

Settings:
ISO 200, Fixed
Aperture: F:11, Fixed
Speed: from 1/125* to 1/320
Focal point: Variable

Panorama specifics:
Vantage is same as the top of the wall
1 horizontal band
9 pictures
Hand-held
Camera is on it's vertical side

Corrections:
Pay attention:
- I should have used the camera internal grid as vertical clue, I did not.
- I should have checked the zoom ration as I know it is loose at times. I did not.
Take one panorama quickly to avoid all this, before or after explaining how to.

* This is the picture that lead to comment #3, should have been 1/200. This was likely caused by a change of location when metering (used the red bricks).

Note: While not intended as such this is also a DOF picture stacking when if comes to extending a depth of field.

Reference as seen with a 22mm zoom setting
Reference as seen with a 22mm zoom setting...

Panorama, emulates a 39mm due to gun clipping
Panorama, emulates a 39mm due to gun clipping...

Reply
Mar 12, 2012 09:48:13   #
nikon_jon Loc: Northeast Arkansas
 
I never had much interest in panoramas. My question is, "Where is the old fort?" Looks a little like Fort Gains on Dauphin island in Mobile bay.

Reply
Mar 12, 2012 10:52:32   #
ole sarg Loc: south florida
 
I use my Canon G10 for panorama. I just follow the directions. Set the camera to stitch, start at the left and move to the right using same focal length. Shot the Manhattan skyline from NJ and had no trouble. The camera and the computer matched things up.



nikon_jon wrote:
I never had much interest in panoramas. My question is, "Where is the old fort?" Looks a little like Fort Gains on Dauphin island in Mobile bay.

Reply
 
 
Mar 12, 2012 11:45:37   #
HEART Loc: God's Country - COLORADO
 
ole sarg wrote:
I use my Canon G10 for panorama. I just follow the directions. Set the camera to stitch, start at the left and move to the right using same focal length. Shot the Manhattan skyline from NJ and had no trouble. The camera and the computer matched things up.



nikon_jon wrote:
I never had much interest in panoramas. My question is, "Where is the old fort?" Looks a little like Fort Gains on Dauphin island in Mobile bay.



Never had a problem with panoramas. Like nikon_jon, the flavor is lost before the gum is chewed; after I'd done a number of them, lost interest.

Reply
Mar 12, 2012 12:12:53   #
English_Wolf Loc: Near Pensacola, FL
 
1) Fort Pickens, Pensacola, FL
2) It is an acquired taste, mostly for landscape photographers

Reply
Mar 12, 2012 14:37:17   #
pfredd
 
Oh, what is so rare as the confessions of a good photographer?
May I add two from my secret vault. I anger myself with any change in camera settings during the shot series, such as leaving any on 'auto'.
Second - the scene: oblique shot from high with town streets crossing the frames - The problem: neither I nor any stitching software could get vertical alignment of streets after hours of manipulation. Solution : click on "remove lens distortion" box,,,,, DUHH.

Reply
Mar 21, 2012 21:51:39   #
Iowegan
 
My first attempt of a panorama, was on the bank of a river, the "downtown" area of the city across the horizon.

Problems were:

#1 I didn't have a tripod, handheld.
#2 On the immediate left, was a structure, that I wanted to include in the panorama.
#3 On the right side, a small tree had twigs clearly in my FOV.
#4 I held the camera in landscape instead of portrait.


PSE 8 did a wonderful job of stitching the stack of images together. It was "almost" flawless, almost.

However, that structure on the left, coupled with my using landscape, forced the remainder of the stack to appear very, very small by comparison.
The twigs on the right side, showed in the composite, and the twigs were not contiguous. They were broken up, part here, part there.

I learned a few things from that!

I know there was much more to pick at, but these were the glaringly obvious, most distracting parts.

We learn, and move on.

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Photo Analysis
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.