Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Photo Gallery
Trying new technique-motion with slow shutter speed
Page 1 of 2 next>
Mar 8, 2012 16:07:08   #
PhotoDeb Loc: San Francisco Bay Area
 
Actually it's an old technique, but new to me. I like the effects you can get. Most come out blurry or uninteresting, but I like the occasional good ones. Probably not everyone's taste, but for those who like something different...

ISO 800, f/10, 1/10 sec.
ISO 800,  f/10, 1/10 sec....

ISO 800, f/10, 1/15 sec.
ISO 800,  f/10, 1/15 sec....

Reply
Mar 8, 2012 17:23:56   #
14kphotog Loc: Marietta, Ohio
 
Interesting, like # 1. :D

Reply
Mar 8, 2012 18:06:21   #
mrosenke Loc: Kalifornia
 
I love the technique. It gives the picture just a little more than just - well "plainness" if that's term. I took this one of my grandson tearing up the ice rink.

Magic on Ice
Magic on Ice...

Reply
 
 
Mar 8, 2012 18:07:58   #
PhotoDeb Loc: San Francisco Bay Area
 
mrosenke wrote:
I love the technique. It gives the picture just a little more than just - well "plainness" if that's term. I took this one of my grandson tearing up the ice rink.


Ooh...I like it. The colors, the movement...nice.

Reply
Mar 8, 2012 18:12:03   #
avsinc
 
PhotoDeb wrote:
Actually it's an old technique, but new to me. I like the effects you can get. Most come out blurry or uninteresting, but I like the occasional good ones. Probably not everyone's taste, but for those who like something different...

Endless possibilities with this. And the cool thing is, unlike static images, you never know ahead of time just how it will turn out. Keep it up, vary your shutter speed a lot, plenty of surprises in store as you refine your technique.

Reply
Mar 8, 2012 18:26:33   #
Silvertone Loc: Chopin, La.
 
PhotoDeb wrote:
Actually it's an old technique, but new to me. I like the effects you can get. Most come out blurry or uninteresting, but I like the occasional good ones. Probably not everyone's taste, but for those who like something different...


Very Cool......

Reply
Mar 8, 2012 18:39:12   #
PhotoDeb Loc: San Francisco Bay Area
 
avsinc wrote:
PhotoDeb wrote:
Actually it's an old technique, but new to me. I like the effects you can get. Most come out blurry or uninteresting, but I like the occasional good ones. Probably not everyone's taste, but for those who like something different...

Endless possibilities with this. And the cool thing is, unlike static images, you never know ahead of time just how it will turn out. Keep it up, vary your shutter speed a lot, plenty of surprises in store as you refine your technique.


Yeah, that's the fun part. Thanks for the suggestion on varying shutter speed. I'll play around with it.

Reply
 
 
Mar 8, 2012 19:41:29   #
docrob Loc: Durango, Colorado
 
PhotoDeb wrote:
avsinc wrote:
PhotoDeb wrote:
Actually it's an old technique, but new to me. I like the effects you can get. Most come out blurry or uninteresting, but I like the occasional good ones. Probably not everyone's taste, but for those who like something different...

Endless possibilities with this. And the cool thing is, unlike static images, you never know ahead of time just how it will turn out. Keep it up, vary your shutter speed a lot, plenty of surprises in store as you refine your technique.


Yeah, that's the fun part. Thanks for the suggestion on varying shutter speed. I'll play around with it.
quote=avsinc quote=PhotoDeb Actually it's an old... (show quote)


Avsinc is correct. As for the oldies doing this sort of stuff Ernest Haas would be a good one to know and study. Freeman Patterson, Michael Orton, Branson Reynolds, myself we mess around with this stuff. I call them "bent light koans" which is a concept Minor White extolled. Because you are introducing the elements of time and movement into the image there is a fairly large degree of chance / serendipity that takes place. Over time, one learns the best movements, light, subjects etc to maximize the chances of receiving a gift....and it always feels like a gift - a grace.

Reply
Mar 8, 2012 20:45:26   #
PhotoDeb Loc: San Francisco Bay Area
 
avsinc wrote:
PhotoDeb wrote:
Actually it's an old technique, but new to me. I like the effects you can get. Most come out blurry or uninteresting, but I like the occasional good ones. Probably not everyone's taste, but for those who like something different...


Avsinc is correct. As for the oldies doing this sort of stuff Ernest Haas would be a good one to know and study. Freeman Patterson, Michael Orton, Branson Reynolds, myself we mess around with this stuff. I call them "bent light koans" which is a concept Minor White extolled. Because you are introducing the elements of time and movement into the image there is a fairly large degree of chance / serendipity that takes place. Over time, one learns the best movements, light, subjects etc to maximize the chances of receiving a gift....and it always feels like a gift - a grace.
quote=PhotoDeb Actually it's an old technique, bu... (show quote)


Very cool. Bent light koans is a great name. I love Minor White and will definitely look more at the others, too. Thanks for the info and the zen. :-)
I would love to see some more from people who have been doing it awhile...

Reply
Mar 8, 2012 20:51:18   #
PhotoDeb Loc: San Francisco Bay Area
 
Docrob wrote:


Avsinc is correct. As for the oldies doing this sort of stuff Ernest Haas would be a good one to know and study. Freeman Patterson, Michael Orton, Branson Reynolds, myself we mess around with this stuff. I call them "bent light koans" which is a concept Minor White extolled. Because you are introducing the elements of time and movement into the image there is a fairly large degree of chance / serendipity that takes place. Over time, one learns the best movements, light, subjects etc to maximize the chances of receiving a gift....and it always feels like a gift - a grace.
br br Avsinc is correct. As for the oldies doin... (show quote)


Very cool. Bent light koans is a great name. I love Minor White and will definitely look more at the others, too. Thanks for the info and the zen. :-)
I would love to see some more from people who have been doing it awhile...[/quote]

Reply
Mar 8, 2012 23:21:56   #
PhotoDeb Loc: San Francisco Bay Area
 
docrob wrote:
PhotoDeb wrote:
avsinc wrote:
PhotoDeb wrote:
Actually it's an old technique, but new to me. I like the effects you can get. Most come out blurry or uninteresting, but I like the occasional good ones. Probably not everyone's taste, but for those who like something different...

Endless possibilities with this. And the cool thing is, unlike static images, you never know ahead of time just how it will turn out. Keep it up, vary your shutter speed a lot, plenty of surprises in store as you refine your technique.


Yeah, that's the fun part. Thanks for the suggestion on varying shutter speed. I'll play around with it.
quote=avsinc quote=PhotoDeb Actually it's an old... (show quote)


Avsinc is correct. As for the oldies doing this sort of stuff Ernest Haas would be a good one to know and study. Freeman Patterson, Michael Orton, Branson Reynolds, myself we mess around with this stuff. I call them "bent light koans" which is a concept Minor White extolled. Because you are introducing the elements of time and movement into the image there is a fairly large degree of chance / serendipity that takes place. Over time, one learns the best movements, light, subjects etc to maximize the chances of receiving a gift....and it always feels like a gift - a grace.
quote=PhotoDeb quote=avsinc quote=PhotoDeb Actu... (show quote)


Now I'm in love with Ernst Haas. Love the bullfighter in particular, but they're all good. Can't wait to check out the others you suggested. So many good photographers, so little time...

Reply
 
 
Mar 8, 2012 23:31:02   #
Joyfullee Loc: South FL
 
PhotoDeb wrote:
Actually it's an old technique, but new to me. I like the effects you can get. Most come out blurry or uninteresting, but I like the occasional good ones. Probably not everyone's taste, but for those who like something different...


My first time seeing this technique (that I can recall) and it has very interesting results. Like both of your photos, but #1 is especially captivating.

Good job! :thumbup:

Reply
Mar 9, 2012 07:36:35   #
rlaugh Loc: Michigan & Florida
 
PhotoDeb wrote:
Actually it's an old technique, but new to me. I like the effects you can get. Most come out blurry or uninteresting, but I like the occasional good ones. Probably not everyone's taste, but for those who like something different...


Love #1 great job! What program did you use for the HDR?

Reply
Mar 9, 2012 10:36:35   #
cybermomm
 
PhotoDeb:

Having trouble figuring this one out. What is moving - the person or the camera (as in panning)? Would you mind explaining your technique? #1 is awesome! Thanks.

Reply
Mar 9, 2012 10:46:44   #
rpavich Loc: West Virginia
 
Very very interesting shots.

So is this a slow shutter speed combined with flash?

Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Photo Gallery
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.