Tarheelnga wrote:
...There is a section that discusses the "Fine Adjustment of AF's Point of Focus". My question is, should I make this adjustment, along with the lens micro-adjustment, or just do the lens adjustment?
Any help or advice would be greatly appreciated.
They are one and the same thing. MFA or Micro Focus Adjustment is just a term that's been commonly used. Latest Canon documents refer to it as Fine Adjustment. But it's the same thing.
You should be able to test to see if any further adjustment is needed. Your 7DII has "version 2.0" of the fine lens adjustment. This allows for two adjustments with zooms like the 150-600mm... one at each end of the zoom range. The original 7D had "version 1.0", which only allowed for one adjustment per lens, even with zooms.
If it helps, there are more sophisticated and precise methods of doing lens focus adjustment, than Canon's method described in the manual. Probably the most thorough and accurate is Reikan FoCal software, which essentially runs a series of tests shots, analyses them, then applies an average of adjustment.
Any lens that tends to produce shallow depth of field, such as a very long focal length or a large aperture, is more likely to benefit from critical fine tuning of the focus. Even then, no lens/camera combo will focus
exactly the same place every time... there are just too many variables that come into play and this is just not all that necessary. Focus calibration such as this should be redone every so often, as lens mechanisms wear over time and things get out of adjustment. At some point the camera's ability to fine tune AF may be exceeded and the lens itself (possibly the camera body, too) will need to be sent in for re-calibration. Some lenses need re-calibration more than others, too.
I'd suggest looking at lensrentals.com's blog about various lenses... for example comparing Canon's original 24-70/2.8 with the 24-70/2.8 II. They handle a large number of any given lens model, regularly test them and maintain as needed... so are a really good source of information about these things.
Not sure about you in particular, but a lot of fretting about precise focus and sharpness is simply due to digital's ability to be easily enlarged to utterly ridiculous levels on a computer monitor. If we look at our images at 100% or larger, that's just plain silly and not at all surprising if focus appears to be off or the image may look a little soft. 100% of a 7DII image file is like looking at a
five foot wide print from approx. 18" away. 200% is like looking at a ten foot wide print from that same distance.
Of course it looks soft! Any image will! Even if we were to make prints that large, we certainly wouldn't be viewing them from anywhere near that close. We need to back off to 50% or 33% when evaluating focus and image sharpness. Even 50% is quite large to be viewing so close.