Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Custom White Balance or Kelvin
Page 1 of 2 next>
Mar 10, 2015 19:57:01   #
capt2575 Loc: New York City
 
Hello Fellow Hoggs,
I am trying to find out which is more accurate custom white balance or Kelvin. Will they or should they give the same results or as close to the same. Any answers will be helpful. Also let me include the fact that this is regarding shooting in a high school dimly lite gym. So the iso will be high (1250-1600) with the f stop (f2.8, f2.0) and shutter speed at least 1/500 or higher.

Reply
Mar 10, 2015 20:07:17   #
twowindsbear
 
Well, just exactly how are you going to measure the color temp in degrees Kelvin? And, how exactly are you going to set the custom WB?

Reply
Mar 10, 2015 20:08:40   #
Erik_H Loc: Denham Springs, Louisiana
 
I'd say that a custom WB would be more accurate because you only have a limited number of kelvin settings to chose from whereas using a custom WB will get you in those "between" ranges.

Reply
 
 
Mar 10, 2015 20:16:07   #
capt2575 Loc: New York City
 
Using the kelvin from the camera instruction manuel(Tungsten light) 3200 and work from there and taking a custom white balance using a grey card.
twowindsbear wrote:
Well, just exactly how are you going to measure the color temp in degrees Kelvin? And, how exactly are you going to set the custom WB?

Reply
Mar 10, 2015 20:34:32   #
twowindsbear
 
capt2575 wrote:
Using the kelvin from the camera instruction manuel(Tungsten light) 3200 and work from there and taking a custom white balance using a grey card.


Given the variables in light bulbs, age of the bulbs, when 1 may have been replaced compared to another, dirt on the bulb, type of reflector, voltage variations, etc., etc., etc., I'd say using the WHITE side of the grey card would probably give you a slightly more accurate WB. For better accuracy, I'll suggest an Expo-disc (or similar device). And for best accuracy, a calibrated color temperature meter.

What degree of WB accuracy does your job require?

Reply
Mar 10, 2015 20:43:23   #
CaptainC Loc: Colorado, south of Denver
 
Well, the accuracy is up to you. If using K, then how so you know what is "accurate?" You can go to live view and keep moving the dial until you like it. That may or may not be accurate. In fact, "accurate" is a moving target. More important is what you like. Personally, I tend to like a slightly warmer color temp than the accurate color.

Shooting a gray card or using something like an Expo Disk can do a good job of setting an "accurate" WB, but I have done that often and then changed it because I did not like the accurate color.

Some (thankfully not all) gyms are lit by lights than change color throughout the 60 cycle wave. Each bulb on a circuit could go through a magenta cast, then maybe a greenish cast. The only solution is to shoot at about 1/30 of a second to allow the the lights to go through full cycles. Not practical for sports.

There is NO correction for this as every frame will have a different color and shooting a gray card is only accurate at that part of the cycle.

Worst case is when adjacent bulbs are on separate circuits. Then one side of a person can be magenta and the other side sorta green. I have done some hockey and you can see circles on the ice of different colors.

Reply
Mar 10, 2015 20:49:31   #
capt2575 Loc: New York City
 
Erik H seems like I will be doing a few test shots using live view, custom white balance and which I feel is the best for me.
Erik_H wrote:
I'd say that a custom WB would be more accurate because you only have a limited number of kelvin settings to chose from whereas using a custom WB will get you in those "between" ranges.

Reply
 
 
Mar 10, 2015 20:51:11   #
capt2575 Loc: New York City
 
Captain C, you have introduced a new element into the quest for proper white balance thanks for the info.
CaptainC wrote:
Well, the accuracy is up to you. If using K, then how so you know what is "accurate?" You can go to live view and keep moving the dial until you like it. That may or may not be accurate. In fact, "accurate" is a moving target. More important is what you like. Personally, I tend to like a slightly warmer color temp than the accurate color.

Shooting a gray card or using something like an Expo Disk can do a good job of setting an "accurate" WB, but I have done that often and then changed it because I did not like the accurate color.
Well, the accuracy is up to you. If using K, then ... (show quote)

Reply
Mar 10, 2015 21:13:05   #
capt2575 Loc: New York City
 
twowindsbear, thank you for insight but it seems there a so "many" variables involved I will try several and get back to everyone with some examples. there is no degree of WB accuracy except me and the kids playing. Hope they enjoy the shots.
twowindsbear wrote:
Given the variables in light bulbs, age of the bulbs, when 1 may have been replaced compared to another, dirt on the bulb, type of reflector, voltage variations, etc., etc., etc., I'd say using the WHITE side of the grey card would probably give you a slightly more accurate WB. For better accuracy, I'll suggest an Expo-disc (or similar device). And for best accuracy, a calibrated color temperature meter.

What degree of WB accuracy does your job require?

Reply
Mar 10, 2015 21:29:32   #
twowindsbear
 
capt2575 wrote:
twowindsbear, thank you for insight but it seems there a so "many" variables involved I will try several and get back to everyone with some examples. there is no degree of WB accuracy except me and the kids playing. Hope they enjoy the shots.


In this case, I'll suggest making a few test shots before the game begins by varying the WB, choose the WB that you like and then shoot the game at that setting. Just remember to reset the WB before your next shoot.

Good luck & have fun!

Reply
Mar 10, 2015 21:55:04   #
sloscheider Loc: Minnesota
 
Also shoot RAW so you can alter the WB later if you need to.

Reply
 
 
Mar 10, 2015 22:04:33   #
Erik_H Loc: Denham Springs, Louisiana
 
capt2575 wrote:
Erik H seems like I will be doing a few test shots using live view, custom white balance and which I feel is the best for me.

What I do in the absence of a custom WB is to use Live view + Kelvin to get me pretty close. since I shoot raw, I can easily adjust in post if needed.

Reply
Mar 10, 2015 22:15:58   #
CaptainC Loc: Colorado, south of Denver
 
Erik_H wrote:
What I do in the absence of a custom WB is to use Live view + Kelvin to get me pretty close. since I shoot raw, I can easily adjust in post if needed.


I think that is a really practical approach.

Reply
Mar 11, 2015 02:55:22   #
WessoJPEG Loc: Cincinnati, Ohio
 
capt2575 wrote:
Hello Fellow Hoggs,
I am trying to find out which is more accurate custom white balance or Kelvin. Will they or should they give the same results or as close to the same. Any answers will be helpful. Also let me include the fact that this is regarding shooting in a high school dimly lite gym. So the iso will be high (1250-1600) with the f stop (f2.8, f2.0) and shutter speed at least 1/500 or higher.


Keep shooting and deleting, and changing WB, untill it suits your fancy, simple.

Reply
Mar 11, 2015 06:16:53   #
Gene51 Loc: Yonkers, NY, now in LSD (LowerSlowerDelaware)
 
capt2575 wrote:
Hello Fellow Hoggs,
I am trying to find out which is more accurate custom white balance or Kelvin. Will they or should they give the same results or as close to the same. Any answers will be helpful. Also let me include the fact that this is regarding shooting in a high school dimly lite gym. So the iso will be high (1250-1600) with the f stop (f2.8, f2.0) and shutter speed at least 1/500 or higher.


Use an Xrite Color Checker Passport, shoot raw, and take all the guesswork out of it.

Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.