Honest Science Proves Evolution Impossible (Page 2): Do the math of the population from just 50,000 years, the population would still be exceedingly too high than the population today.

Racmanaz Loc: Sunny Tucson!

silver wrote:

If there was anything of substance, to prove it wrong would not take much but since the premise is so silly its not even worth trying. Lame idea at best.

Do the math of the population from just 50,000 years, the population would still be exceedingly too high than the population today.

silver Loc: Santa Monica Ca.

Racmanaz wrote:

Do the math of the population from just 50,000 years, the population would still be exceedingly too high than the population today.

Your totally wrong. Your "math" is just silly. Nobody know what the population was 50,000 years ago and besides you only believe that the world is only 6,000 years old and men walked with dinosaurs so how could your "math" be even considered?

Racmanaz Loc: Sunny Tucson!

silver wrote:

Your totally wrong. Your "math" is just silly. Nobody know what the population was 50,000 years ago and besides you only believe that the world is only 6,000 years old and men walked with dinosaurs so how could your "math" be even considered?

Silver, of course nobody knows what that population was 50,000 years ago. This is why they calculated starting with just 2 people, one male ans one female, yet the population was still wayyyy too extreme.

silver Loc: Santa Monica Ca.

Racmanaz wrote:

Silver, of course nobody knows what that population was 50,000 years ago. This is why they calculated starting with just 2 people, one male ans one female, yet the population was still wayyyy too extreme.

But you believe that the world is only 6,000 years old and man walked with dinosaurs so its a moot point for you.

user47602 Loc: ip 304.0.0.33.32

Racmanaz wrote:

Silver, of course nobody knows what that population was 50,000 years ago. This is why they calculated starting with just 2 people, one male ans one female, yet the population was still wayyyy too extreme.

2 people could not account for the amount of variation in the human genome....

..without evolution

Racmanaz Loc: Sunny Tucson!

silver wrote:

But you believe that the world is only 6,000 years old so its a moot point for you.

They did the same calculation for today's population and the average calculations were that humans have started with just 2 people about 4,500 to 5,500 years ago.

Racmanaz Loc: Sunny Tucson!

user47602 wrote:

2 people could not account for the amount of variation in the human genome....

Of course it can and does

..without evolution

user47602 Loc: ip 304.0.0.33.32

but according to your "scientific" sources...

didn't humanity almost get wiped out 4000 years ago... so really we all have the genes of the Noah family... and so how did the Noah's all evolve into blacks and asians and muslims in just 100 generations?

Racmanaz Loc: Sunny Tucson!

user47602 wrote:

2 people could not account for the amount of variation in the human genome....

Neo Darwinian evilution does not exist

..without evolution

Racmanaz Loc: Sunny Tucson!

user47602 wrote:

but according to your "scientific" sources...

didn't humanity almost get wiped out 4000 years ago... so really we all have the genes of the Noah family... and so how did the Noah's all evolve into blacks and asians and muslims in just 100 generations?

The estimate of the flood was between 4,500 to 5,500 years ago. Which brings us to the current population of today Almost to the tee

Racmanaz Loc: Sunny Tucson!

user47602 wrote:

but according to your "scientific" sources...

didn't humanity almost get wiped out 4000 years ago... so really we all have the genes of the Noah family... and so how did the Noah's all evolve into blacks and asians and muslims in just 100 generations?

Tower of Babel

user47602 Loc: ip 304.0.0.33.32

Racmanaz wrote:

They did the same calculation for today's population and the average calculations were that humans have started with just 2 people about 4,500 to 5,500 years ago.

but Noah had a wife and 3 sons with wives in their prime childbearing years :roll:

silver Loc: Santa Monica Ca.

Racmanaz wrote:

They did the same calculation for today's population and the average calculations were that humans have started with just 2 people about 4,500 to 5,500 years ago.

So which is it? Is the world only 6,000 years old or is your 50,000 figure correct or maybe the earth is 1.000,000 years old or a billion or 5 billion? If man walked with dinosaurs then how about all the people that dinosaurs ate? I am sure that quite a few dinosaurs were meat eaters so how many people did they eat? Would this affect your numbers?

silver Loc: Santa Monica Ca.

Racmanaz wrote:

Do the math of the population from just 50,000 years, the population would still be exceedingly too high than the population today.

Honest science, HAHAHAHAHA

Racmanaz Loc: Sunny Tucson!

[quote=user47602]but Noah had a wife and 3 sons with wives in their prime childbearing years :roll:[/quotypo on
Yes, they calculated it for 2 people for the 200,000 years and 8 people afyer the flood, sorry I missed typoed on that Thinking Adam and Eve.