G.A.S. Dilemma D750 or D7200? I was planning on upgrading from my D5200 with 18-200mm VR11 lens to the D750 with 24-120mm. However, I was waiting for the announcement of the D7200. Now...

Jeep for Larry Loc: Grapevine, Texas

I was planning on upgrading from my D5200 with 18-200mm VR11 lens to the D750 with 24-120mm. However, I was waiting for the announcement of the D7200. Now that it is announced, I have a dilemma.

I thought I wanted move up to FX with higher ISO, larger sensor, and more control. I really do use the flip LCD on my D5200, that is similar on the D750. If the D7200 had the same tilt screen as the D750 I would most likely get the D7200 with it's even higher ISO, larger buffer, and capability with my existing 18-200mm and 35mm DX lens. I could even add a Nikon 10-24mm for 800.00 and still be 1200.00 less than the D750 with 24-120mm. However, will I be disappointed to not move up to FX?

I am just hobbyist that likes to take sunsets, landscapes, interesting shots and family photos.

speters Loc: Grangeville/Idaho

Jeep for Larry wrote:

I was planning on upgrading from my D5200 with 18-... (show quote)

The D7200 is a fantastic camera, but it can't touch the D 750 IMHO, that is especially true in low-light-shooting! Definitely worth the few extra bucks!!

Rongnongno Loc: FL

Jeep for Larry wrote:

...I am just hobbyist that likes to take sunsets, landscapes, interesting shots and family photos.

What you are or what you do does not really matter. What matters is are you happy with the current DX format (and investment)?

If yes, don't change.

If no, you can still use your lenses but the camera will automatically crop your image to DX so... Additional $$$ would be needed to be up to par with the FX camera capabilities.

wilsondl2 Loc: Lincoln, Nebraska

If you don't go with the FF you will always think you are useing a 2nd class camera. It's just the way some folks are so go for it. - Dave

Mike D. Loc: Crowley County, CO.

I know this won't help much but it boils down to affordability. Comparing a DX to an FX is like comparing an apple to an orange. The similiarities end after the realization that they are both pieces of fruit.

For me, I can't afford to go full frame and will attempt to worry about it when/if I outgrow the D7100. Since this isn't likely to happen for quite some time, I am content with trying to squeak out decent pictures with the crappy glass that I have.

At the end of the day though, if you can swing the D750 without breaking the bank, I seriously doubt you would be disappointed.

Kmgw9v Loc: Miami, Florida

Now that you have seriously considered going full frame, can you let go of that, and be wholly satisfied with the crop sensor?

SonnyE Loc: Communist California, USA

If I had your dilemma, I would go for the D750. Just remember you will probably want more glass down the road.
The real beauty of Nikon is the glass will, if desired, work on either body.
That way you would have both ends of the stick.

I just hope nobody used the stick to move a stopped up toilet. :-o

Unless, of course, if you really, really need something the D7200 offers.

Jeep for Larry Loc: Grapevine, Texas

speters wrote:

The D7200 is a fantastic camera, but it can't touch the D 750 IMHO, that is especially true in low-light-shooting! Definitely worth the few extra bucks!!

Thanks, I am really looking for that low light capability and Nikon has indicated that 25,600 ISO is not a "HI" setting on the 7200 but maybe the FX is still better.

Jeep for Larry Loc: Grapevine, Texas

Rongnongno wrote:

What you are or what you do does not really matter. What matters is are you happy with the current DX format (and investment)?

If yes, don't change.

If no, you can still use your lenses but the camera will automatically crop your image to DX so... Additional $$$ would be needed to be up to par with the FX camera capabilities.

Thanks, the lure of the FX is probably going to win out.

Jeep for Larry Loc: Grapevine, Texas

wilsondl2 wrote:

If you don't go with the FF you will always think you are useing a 2nd class camera. It's just the way some folks are so go for it. - Dave

Thanks, yes, I think you might be correct.

Jeep for Larry Loc: Grapevine, Texas

Mike D. wrote:

I know this won't help much but it boils down to a... (show quote)

Thanks, It won't break the bank but will slow the future upgrades of glass for sure.

Jeep for Larry Loc: Grapevine, Texas

Kmgw9v wrote:

Now that you have seriously considered going full frame, can you let go of that, and be wholly satisfied with the crop sensor?

Hmmm, maybe not.

Jeep for Larry Loc: Grapevine, Texas

SonnyE wrote:

If I had your dilemma, I would go for the D750. Just remember you will probably want more glass down the road.
The real beauty of Nikon is the glass will, if desired, work on either body.
That way you would have both ends of the stick.

I just hope nobody used the stick to move a stopped up toilet. :-o

Unless, of course, if you really, really need something the D7200 offers.

Leaning towards D750...

SonnyE Loc: Communist California, USA

Jeep for Larry wrote:

Leaning towards D750...

Should I give you a push? ;)

Nikon_DonB Loc: Chicago

I had the similar dilemma a few years ago. I was waiting for the D7100 to be released and in the meantime the D600 came out. The rest is "Insanity," oppps. "History!"
Get the Full Frame D750. NO QUESTIONS ASKED!