Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
True Macro-Photography Forum
Plum blossom 2nd & 3rd stack attempt
Feb 21, 2015 21:03:30   #
Muddyvalley Loc: McMinnville, Oregon
 
Nikon D750 at ISO 100, Nikkor 105 macro lens, 1/200-sec at f/6.3, Nikon SB-800 speedlight at 1/16 power with 5x8-inch soft box, Starting point about 1:1. ControlMyNikon-5 controlled 29 frames, step size 53, then Zerene compilation.

I tried to get the stamens "snail eyes" in focus. :-) I see some of them blurred out. Not sure what I'm doing to cause that.
The second shot was the first attempt without the flash. Didn't work out so well.

2nd try with speedlight
2nd try with speedlight...
(Download)

1st try LED bulb overhead fixture
1st try LED bulb overhead fixture...
(Download)

Reply
Feb 21, 2015 21:48:05   #
Nikonian72 Loc: Chico CA
 
Might be slight movement of stamens, just from people movement in the room. I also think that white subjects are more difficult to properly expose.

Reply
Feb 21, 2015 22:22:01   #
Muddyvalley Loc: McMinnville, Oregon
 
Nikonian72 wrote:
Might be slight movement of stamens, just from people movement in the room. I also think that white subjects are more difficult to properly expose.
If you enlarge the first photo, you'll see one that isn't really blurry, it's sort of transparent/translucent.
(flower is about 2cm left to right..

Reply
 
 
Feb 21, 2015 22:37:54   #
naturepics43 Loc: Hocking Co. Ohio - USA
 
Muddyvalley wrote:
If you enlarge the first photo, you'll see one that isn't really blurry, it's sort of transparent/translucent. (flower is about 2cm left to right.
Not bad for just starting out with a new process. I don't think 29 frames @ f5.6 is near enough. Try a run with about 60 frames. I think the transparent stamen is at the very edge of one of the frames. I'm still in the early stages of stacking so I could be wrong. Keep shooting, you'll make it.

Reply
Feb 21, 2015 22:57:41   #
Muddyvalley Loc: McMinnville, Oregon
 
naturepics43 wrote:
Not bad for just starting out with a new process. I don't think 29 frames @ f5.6 is near enough. Try a run with about 60 frames. I think the transparent stamen is at the very edge of one of the frames. I'm still in the early stages of stacking so I could be wrong. Keep shooting, you'll make it.

Thanks for the advise! I'll try twice as many. Should I try a smaller aperture too? F-8 maybe?

Reply
Feb 21, 2015 23:45:15   #
Qbert Loc: Virginia
 
naturepics43 wrote:
Not bad for just starting out with a new process. I don't think 29 frames @ f5.6 is near enough. Try a run with about 60 frames. I think the transparent stamen is at the very edge of one of the frames. I'm still in the early stages of stacking so I could be wrong. Keep shooting, you'll make it.


I think this is a worthy first attempt.
I do agree that more frames may be necessary, 40-60 @ f/5.6
f/4 or f/5.6 seems to produces the best sharpness with this lens, especially at 1:1

Make sure that when you are defining your near/far focus limits that you go several steps beyond what appears to be everything in focus, just to be certain nothing else suddenly pops into focus a few clicks beyond where you thought you had everything. For me this is always on the near side.

I have seen movements appear like this also, but zerene usually handles this pretty good.

Anytime Im shooting inside I turn off or close the heat/AC vents and the ceiling fans to prevent these movements. But like Douglass said, even people moving around can create enough air movement.

Reply
Feb 22, 2015 00:05:55   #
Muddyvalley Loc: McMinnville, Oregon
 
The stamens that are strange are more transparent than blurred. The flash was on this side. I had it on the camera shoe with the camera on it's side& rotated the final photo 90* Maybe something to do with the light? One appears to be in focus, however a couple look like they were partially missing.


(Download)

Reply
 
 
Feb 22, 2015 00:12:13   #
Qbert Loc: Virginia
 
Muddyvalley wrote:
The stamens that are strange are more transparent than blurred. The flash was on this side. I had it on the camera shoe with the camera on it's side& rotated the final photo 90* Maybe something to do with the light? One appears to be in focus, however a couple look like they were partially missing.


That transparent stamen appears to be a zerene issue. You can go back and find the slice(s) that have that area in focus and use the retouch feature in zerene to correct this.

Reply
Feb 22, 2015 00:19:42   #
Muddyvalley Loc: McMinnville, Oregon
 
Qbert wrote:
That transparent stamen appears to be a zerene issue. You can go back and find the slice(s) that have that area in focus and use the retouch feature in zerene to correct this.


If I can figure out how to do that. :-) I'll give it a shot. I think I saw a tutorial on that. Thanks!
Edit: It was in the first few frames. It took 8 frames from tip of the stamen to the base.

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
True Macro-Photography Forum
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.