achammar wrote:
I have some images that have strange color problems in the skin. Some do, and some don't, even when taken close together from the same spot.
Here are 2 examples, one taken right after the other one..
The first one has a rough greenish color on her arm and face, the second is fine. Both were taken from the same distance and in the same spot. I did have my ISO set really high, and I don't remember why now.....I may just not have noticed it was set that high. These are just crops of the entire picture and the skin is where the problem is. These are original untouched images straight off my card (other than the cropping)
I know my ISO should have been less and the exposure time maybe increased and my f stop opened up more , but is that what the problem is here?
I was using a Nikon D60 with an SB600 flash mounted to the camera
Settings for photo 1:
F stop = f13
1/160 exposure time
ISO 800
Focal length 30
With flash
Settings for photo 2 (exposure time is the only difference)
F stop = f13
1/100 exposure time
ISO 800
Focal length 30
With flash
Anyone know the reason for the green rough colors in picture 1?
(Actually I do remember why I had my f stop set so small. The background was a very large window and I was trying to avoid overexposure of the light outside)....
I have some images that have strange color problem... (
show quote)
Any reason the exposure times were different. Seems the metering data was not the same and may have resulted in the different exp times. I have had that happen, also have had a rare low flash output for whatever reason. Probably one or the other or neither....that is the very nice benefit of digital...instant feedback.
It seems that your flash was set in TTL or A mode. With these modes, the flash will only deliver the amount of light it thinks is right for a given situation. In your first photo, notice that the bride's earring and beads of the gown became highly reflective. Hence, your flash was fooled by the reflective surfaces. It may have registered as though your subject is well lighted. Hence your flash gave a very low output. Your second photo does not show much reflective surfaces.
This happens all the time. So I recommend that you shoot a lot during a wedding coverage or any event to compensate for situations such as this. I don't recommend setting your flash to manual because you may not be fast enough to adjusting the settings (of the flash and camera) that you will end up with more over or under exposures.
birdpix
Loc: South East Pennsylvania
I have a question here. What kind of lighting was in the reception hall? If it was fluorescent and you were shooting near the setting necessary for ambient light then there can be white balance and intensity issues becasue the bulbs cycle through different colors and intensities if that shot is timed with the part of the cycle that is orange, then you get inconsistent results from shot to shot. Fluorescent bulbs cycle at twice the hertz of the line voltage (60 hertz x2 = 120 cycles per second). anytime you shoot at a shutter speed higher than 1/120 you can have these problems.
birdpix wrote:
I have a question here. What kind of lighting was in the reception hall? If it was fluorescent and you were shooting near the setting necessary for ambient light then there can be white balance and intensity issues becasue the bulbs cycle through different colors and intensities if that shot is timed with the part of the cycle that is orange, then you get inconsistent results from shot to shot. Fluorescent bulbs cycle at twice the hertz of the line voltage (60 hertz x2 = 120 cycles per second). anytime you shoot at a shutter speed higher than 1/120 you can have these problems.
I have a question here. What kind of lighting was ... (
show quote)
It was flourescent and the picture that I took at 1/100 came out good...Maybe that did have something to do with it...that's a good point
birdpix
Loc: South East Pennsylvania
achammar wrote:
birdpix wrote:
I have a question here. What kind of lighting was in the reception hall? If it was fluorescent and you were shooting near the setting necessary for ambient light then there can be white balance and intensity issues becasue the bulbs cycle through different colors and intensities if that shot is timed with the part of the cycle that is orange, then you get inconsistent results from shot to shot. Fluorescent bulbs cycle at twice the hertz of the line voltage (60 hertz x2 = 120 cycles per second). anytime you shoot at a shutter speed higher than 1/120 you can have these problems.
I have a question here. What kind of lighting was ... (
show quote)
It was flourescent and the picture that I took at 1/100 came out good...Maybe that did have something to do with it...that's a good point
quote=birdpix I have a question here. What kind o... (
show quote)
I don't doubt it. Do a google search for fluorecent light problems/ photography and you will see many references.
Erv wrote:
Looks to me like your flash didn't fire. You can look at the metadata and see the settings. It will tell you. Are you giving it enough time to recycle?
Erv
I agree....either the flash did not fire or wasn't up to full power when you shot the picture.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.