Hi fellow hogs,
I'm going to Plovdiv, Bulgaria next month and I'm planning to take the Eos M with me instead of my Olympus EP5.
I have the 22mm kit lens and want a zoom that I have to buy. I cannot make a decision between the native mount Tamron 18-200 and the Canon 18-135 STM that I can mount with the adapter.
Between these two which do you suggest for faster AF, IQ and portability (even if I think this will not be a problem).
I think one major drawback for the Tamron is it's value if I want to sell in the future. Here in Italy it is next to none.
elandel wrote:
Hi fellow hogs,
I'm going to Plovdiv, Bulgaria next month and I'm planning to take the Eos M with me instead of my Olympus EP5.
I have the 22mm kit lens and want a zoom that I have to buy. I cannot make a decision between the native mount Tamron 18-200 and the Canon 18-135 STM that I can mount with the adapter.
Between these two which do you suggest for faster AF, IQ and portability (even if I think this will not be a problem).
I think one major drawback for the Tamron is it's value if I want to sell in the future. Here in Italy it is next to none.
Hi fellow hogs, br br I'm going to Plovdiv, Bulga... (
show quote)
Hello elandel.
I think you will be ok with the 18-135mm STM.
I agree with RichardSM, most especially, with the STM technology on the Canon 18-135mm lens. And, yes, Canon lenses have high resale value although I don't think you will sell it. It's a keeper!!!
Um, the dxo marks are higher on the ep5 on all accounts. Why not shoot with that camera? It's not as though it's a size/weight issue.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.