Do you think my Camera is in Focus
Jan 17, 2015 13:00:46 #
Weather warmed up a little. got outside not much to Photo.
Nikon D7000 Nikon 18-105mm
Nikon D7000 Nikon 18-105mm
Empty Pot waiting for spring
(Download)
Hope this keeps working
(Download)
The old trickle charger
(Download)
Jan 17, 2015 13:19:49 #
Jan 17, 2015 13:32:48 #
sarge69 wrote:
My eyes can't see any faults or out of focus. Good Good
Sarge69
Sarge69
Thanks Sarge, love your Chimp.
Jan 17, 2015 13:39:09 #
Jan 17, 2015 14:21:05 #
ebbote wrote:
I think it is as focused as it is going to get, very good.
Thanks ebbote, the pro's frown on this kit lens, but I love the 18-105
I also have a 15-55, 55-200, 55-300, tamron 70-300 macro,
50mm-1.8, 35mm-1.8 can't see how it could be much better.
Jan 17, 2015 14:31:48 #
Wesso wrote:
Thanks Sarge, love your Chimp.
It's only cool on some of the weird stuff folks say on here. If you change if for one comment, it changes it on everything. So I leave it.
Sarge69
Jan 17, 2015 14:41:25 #
Wesso, I have an 18-140mm 1:3.5-5.6g ED VR on a D7000
that is not much sharper than your lens.
that is not much sharper than your lens.
Jan 17, 2015 15:30:14 #
Wesso wrote:
Thanks ebbote, the pro's frown on this kit lens, but I love the 18-105
I also have a 15-55, 55-200, 55-300, tamron 70-300 macro,
50mm-1.8, 35mm-1.8 can't see how it could be much better.
I also have a 15-55, 55-200, 55-300, tamron 70-300 macro,
50mm-1.8, 35mm-1.8 can't see how it could be much better.
Why do you have so many lenses covering the same focal length?
Jan 17, 2015 15:30:32 #
ebbote wrote:
Wesso, I have an 18-140mm 1:3.5-5.6g ED VR on a D7000
that is not much sharper than your lens.
that is not much sharper than your lens.
I like the little statue , thanks.
Jan 17, 2015 15:34:01 #
twowindsbear wrote:
Why do you have so many lenses covering the same focal length?
That's a good question, read all this stuff and run out and buy it.
Need to sell some of it. Now I hear how much better a D7100 is than a
D7000. I'm not a smart man two wind.
Jan 17, 2015 15:35:08 #
[quote=Wesso]That's a good question, read all this stuff and run out and buy it.
Need to sell some of it. Now I hear how much better a D7100 is than a
D7000. I'm not a smart man two wind. What's a focal length ?
Need to sell some of it. Now I hear how much better a D7100 is than a
D7000. I'm not a smart man two wind. What's a focal length ?
Jan 17, 2015 16:07:18 #
To me, #2 looks noticeably sharper than the other two, and with more depth of field. In #3, the face of the charger is almost crisp, with the focus tailing off behind it. In #1, it looks to me as if the focus point is just a little forward of the rear of the rim of the pot, just ahead of where it meets the rear handle, but not as crisp as in #2. But my eyes have more than the allotted 3 score years and ten, so it may be just me. Overall, #2 shows that you can get good focus from the lens.
Jan 17, 2015 16:14:41 #
Straight Shooter wrote:
To me, #2 looks noticeably sharper than the other two, and with more depth of field. In #3, the face of the charger is almost crisp, with the focus tailing off behind it. In #1, it looks to me as if the focus point is just a little forward of the rear of the rim of the pot, just ahead of where it meets the rear handle, but not as crisp as in #2. But my eyes have more than the allotted 3 score years and ten, so it may be just me. Overall, #2 shows that you can get good focus from the lens.
Thanks Straight Shooter.
Jan 17, 2015 16:47:00 #
I agree with everyone else, they seem in focus. Has there been post processing, or in camera processing? Have you compared a raw file vs. the jpg? I've noticed it in processing raw files that for some scenes sharpness is adjusted to varying degrees, landscapes and portraits are softened somewhat, others are left unaffected or unadjusted.
Just a thought.
Just a thought.
Jan 17, 2015 17:29:39 #
Clive22 wrote:
I agree with everyone else, they seem in focus. Has there been post processing, or in camera processing? Have you compared a raw file vs. the jpg? I've noticed it in processing raw files that for some scenes sharpness is adjusted to varying degrees, landscapes and portraits are softened somewhat, others are left unaffected or unadjusted.
Just a thought.
Just a thought.
No post processing, Don't know anything about raw files. I just take pictures.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.