Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Lightroom 5... subscribe or strand alone?
Jan 9, 2015 08:57:24   #
bbrowner Loc: Chapel Hill, NC
 
As an enthusiast with no professional ambitions... I am impressed with Lightroom possibilities for my photos. And at 81... I approach my photography wanting to achieve the best images I can... for myself... and not too much further. But I find the editing process very creative. (I was a professional musician.)

With that in mind... I'm asking your opinion. Buying a stand-alone Lightroom 5... or subscribing.

Is the subscription cost likely to go up after the first year? A subscription for the first year is less than the cost of a stand-alone. But what then?

Thanks for your thoughts and advice.

Reply
Jan 9, 2015 09:03:06   #
Searcher Loc: Kent, England
 
bbrowner wrote:
As an enthusiast with no professional ambitions... I am impressed with Lightroom possibilities for my photos. And at 81... I approach my photography wanting to achieve the best images I can... for myself... and not too much further. But I find the editing process very creative. (I was a professional musician.)

With that in mind... I'm asking your opinion. Buying a stand-alone Lightroom 5... or subscribing.

Is the subscription cost likely to go up after the first year? A subscription for the first year is less than the cost of a stand-alone. But what then?

Thanks for your thoughts and advice.
As an enthusiast with no professional ambitions...... (show quote)


I am well into my 2nd year on subscription and no price increases yet.

A one year sub to Lightroom breaks even (your figures) but don't forget the "free" copy of Photoshop you will get with every Lightroom copy.

Reply
Jan 9, 2015 09:17:30   #
grfern Loc: Bloomington, Illinois
 
Hi- I'm retired and finances are always foremost in my mind. I was not a fan of the Adobe subscription model but I took advantage of it. My reasons were mainly that just as I was getting adequate at whatever Lightroom I had, (I got serious at learning the program at Lightroom 3) when the next version came out there would be some features that I really wanted to try. I believe you would do fine with buying LR5 and sticking with it, but in my case I am interested in learning Photoshop. The subscription I bought makes it sort of like buying the whole thing on an instalment plan. Plus when the next "best" version comes out I have it. Much easier on my budget. If there ever comes a time when I cannot afford the subscription then my finances will be in dire straits and photography will not be a priority. These are just my feelings I hope they help.

Reply
 
 
Jan 9, 2015 09:40:10   #
Dngallagher Loc: Wilmington De.
 
bbrowner wrote:
As an enthusiast with no professional ambitions... I am impressed with Lightroom possibilities for my photos. And at 81... I approach my photography wanting to achieve the best images I can... for myself... and not too much further. But I find the editing process very creative. (I was a professional musician.)

With that in mind... I'm asking your opinion. Buying a stand-alone Lightroom 5... or subscribing.

Is the subscription cost likely to go up after the first year? A subscription for the first year is less than the cost of a stand-alone. But what then?

Thanks for your thoughts and advice.
As an enthusiast with no professional ambitions...... (show quote)


I got into the Adobe CC program awhile back and think it is a great deal, 10.00 a month for the newest Lightroom, Bridge & Photoshop can't be beat in my book.

Nice to always have the latest and greatest editing & management software for only 10.00 a month.

Since the subscription is for a year, no cost increases till renewal time, and if costs go up too much, there are other alternatives to both products.

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.