The Cambrian explosion 1&2 completely destroys and pulverizes the theory of evolution...
Nov 3, 2014 22:32:05 #
Nov 4, 2014 00:08:02 #
I watched the first video, and came away with two questions.
1. Where does this video disprove evolution? I don't know very much about the Cambrian epoch, but I'm willing to bet that there are many well accepted theories about it.
2. As a biblical literalist, how can you use this to disprove anything? You believe the earth is 6,000 years old, but the video you chose is about the Cambrian Period, which everyone knows occurred about 540 million years ago. How do you reconcile this?
1. Where does this video disprove evolution? I don't know very much about the Cambrian epoch, but I'm willing to bet that there are many well accepted theories about it.
2. As a biblical literalist, how can you use this to disprove anything? You believe the earth is 6,000 years old, but the video you chose is about the Cambrian Period, which everyone knows occurred about 540 million years ago. How do you reconcile this?
Nov 4, 2014 00:15:00 #
Nov 4, 2014 00:29:21 #
Racmanaz wrote:
Uh Rac......the Cambrian Explosion occured over 500 million years ago, and lasted about 53 million years. How does this help your case for a 6000 year old earth....... ? ? ?The Cambrian explosion 1&2 completely destroys and pulverizes the theory of evolution...
Nov 4, 2014 00:58:19 #
Racmanaz
Loc: Sunny Tucson!
tschmath wrote:
I watched the first video, and came away with two ... (show quote)
This disproves evolution for the fact that all these species appeared all of the sudden with no transitional beginnings and none after. How did you come to the conclusion that I believe the earth is 6,000 years old? These are some scientists who are saying the Cambrian occurred millions of years ago, not all scientist believe this option. I sometimes post clips with atheist scientist that believe the earth is old and not young, either way does not effect Creation theory.
Nov 4, 2014 03:09:02 #
user47602
Loc: ip 304.0.0.33.32
Racmanaz wrote:
That's not true at all Racmanaz... Either the Bible is the literal word of God, or it's not. Either the Bible says that creation is 6000 years old or it doesn't. The only "proof" you have of God creating the universe is the Bible, which you believe to be the literal word of God....... I sometimes post clips with atheist scientist that believe the earth is old and not young, either way does not effect Creation theory.
So if the Bible is the literal Word of God, then the creation is 6000 years old. If creation is older than 6000 years, then the Bible is not the literal Word of God... you cannot have it both ways, science is a pyramid with blocks below and above each concept... you cannot just pick and choose blocks which to believe and which to declare the work of satan.
Nov 4, 2014 04:27:14 #
Does not just "destroy and pulverize." It liquefies, is amazing and irrefutable scientific proof, its astounding and amazing! All the atheists will immediately convert to fundie Christianity after viewing this!!!
How could they possibly do otherwise?
Why do ya'll keep feeding this nutjob's ego by responding to these posts. One cannot have a debate with an insane person.
Get out from under your bed rac, and go live the life that God made possible for you.
How could they possibly do otherwise?
Why do ya'll keep feeding this nutjob's ego by responding to these posts. One cannot have a debate with an insane person.
Get out from under your bed rac, and go live the life that God made possible for you.
Nov 4, 2014 07:34:22 #
user47602 wrote:
.........So if the Bible is the literal Word of God, then the creation is 6000 years old. If creation is older than 6000 years, then the Bible is not the literal Word of God....
Well, you kinda sound like you know what you are talking about...kinda...I need you to show me where the Bible sez creation is 6000 years old.
Nov 4, 2014 09:11:34 #
Robert Graybeal wrote:
Take a look at "Morris, Henry M., 1974. Scientific Creationism, Green Forest, AR: Master Books, p. 158." The 6 millennial age of the earth has been the bedrock of biblical inerrancy since the 16th century, when Bishop Paley calculated its age from the lifespan information in the bible.Well, you kinda sound like you know what you are talking about...kinda...I need you to show me where the Bible sez creation is 6000 years old.
Nov 4, 2014 09:15:00 #
Racmanaz wrote:
This disproves evolution for the fact that all these species appeared all of the sudden with no transitional beginnings and none after. How did you come to the conclusion that I believe the earth is 6,000 years old? These are some scientists who are saying the Cambrian occurred millions of years ago, not all scientist believe this option. I sometimes post clips with atheist scientist that believe the earth is old and not young, either way does not effect Creation theory.
Where do you get these ideas that there were no transitional forms during the Cambrian dispersion. One example are the lobopods (basically worms with legs) which are intermediate between arthropods and worm, which existed during that time. With a little effort you could find many other examples.
Nov 4, 2014 09:15:42 #
OldDoc wrote:
Take a look at "Morris, Henry M., 1974. Scientific Creationism, Green Forest, AR: Master Books, p. 158." The 6 millennial age of the earth has been the bedrock of biblical inerrancy since the 16th century, when Bishop Paley calculated its age from the lifespan information in the bible.
"I need you to show me where the Bible sez creation is 6000 years old." show me in the Bible not some other idiots opinion.
Nov 4, 2014 09:17:42 #
OldDoc wrote:
Where do you get these ideas that there were no transitional forms during the Cambrian dispersion. One example are the lobopods (basically worms with legs) which are intermediate between arthropods and worm, which existed during that time. With a little effort you could find many other examples.
a different species. show where one species evolved into another.
Nov 4, 2014 09:27:08 #
Robert Graybeal wrote:
You don't find many Cambrian species (or even phyla) alive today. That includes plants, which didn't appear until well after the Cambrian. The possible explanations are either that there was another creation event that the bible somehow missed, or that life comes from other life with modifications. Evolutionary theory simply tries to explain the forces that lead to such modifications.a different species. show where one species evolved into another.
Nov 4, 2014 09:31:06 #
Robert Graybeal wrote:
You are correct, the bible does not specifically say that the earth is 6000 (or whatever) years old, but that figure is a bedrock concept for that branch of creationists known as Young Earth Creationists, a branch that clings to biblical inerrancy and literalism that leads to creationism. I just assumed that Rac is a member of this branch due to his strong adherence to its philosophy, but I could be wrong in this assumption."I need you to show me where the Bible sez creation is 6000 years old." show me in the Bible not some other idiots opinion.
Nov 4, 2014 09:48:15 #
OldDoc wrote:
You are correct, the bible does not specifically say that the earth is 6000 (or whatever) years old, but that figure is a bedrock concept for that branch of creationists known as Young Earth Creationists, a branch that clings to biblical inerrancy and literalism that leads to creationism. I just assumed that Rac is a member of this branch due to his strong adherence to its philosophy, but I could be wrong in this assumption.
He's lived in Arizona for about 15 years and has never visited the Grand Canyon (according to him). The sight of that has no doubt shaken the beliefs of more than one of these idiots.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.