Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Completes the "Holy Trinity"
Page <prev 2 of 5 next> last>>
Sep 28, 2014 15:00:31   #
PhotoArtsLA Loc: Boynton Beach
 
Generally, even the best of zoom lenses are put to shame by a great prime lens. Best to have both.

Reply
Sep 28, 2014 15:31:01   #
amehta Loc: Boston
 
Mickey Mantle wrote:
I will try to be honest. My GAS is is satisfied for quite some time.
Will try the "HOLY TRINITY" on my old and beat up d40 just for kicks

Ok, I won't tempt you with any fast primes. ;-)

Reply
Sep 28, 2014 15:43:49   #
Mickey Mantle Loc: New York City
 
Please don't no way

Reply
 
 
Sep 28, 2014 15:45:41   #
amehta Loc: Boston
 
Mickey Mantle wrote:
Please don't no way

:twisted: :lol: :lol:

Reply
Sep 29, 2014 07:22:45   #
Brucej67 Loc: Cary, NC
 
How about an "E" lens, say an Nikon 300mm F2.8 or a 500mm F4?

Mickey Mantle wrote:
Now my GAS is complete. Nothing else to wish for or want.

Reply
Sep 29, 2014 07:24:00   #
lighthouse Loc: No Fixed Abode
 
Mormorazzi wrote:
Dang, I wish I could sell my firstborn child so I could buy get that trio, but no one's taken me up my offer yet. She comes complete with four adorable kids under five years old. Any takers? (Never mind, I wouldn't have anything to photograph.)


You might be better off to buy her a TV.:-)

Reply
Sep 29, 2014 08:30:58   #
Frank W Loc: Adirondacks in NY
 
Mickey Mantle wrote:
Now my GAS is complete. Nothing else to wish for or want.
You just wait, it'll come back. There's no cure, remember. :-)

Reply
 
 
Sep 29, 2014 08:34:39   #
dynaquest1 Loc: Austin, Texas
 
Dang it! I bought the 70-200 2.8 a few months ago and STILL find my self using the 70-300mm VR instead due to weight and stabilization. I play around with the 70-200 in low light situations but when it comes to grabbing a long lens to put in my bag and take with me, I almost always choose the 70-300. Same with the 24-70mm 2.8. I love the idea of this lens and love it, love it for what it is....but if I'm going to be walking around all day I choose the 24-85mm or the very lightweight Nikon 28-200mm. I probably will never buy the 14-24mm as I use a Sigma 12-24 and am very satisfied with it.

Reply
Sep 29, 2014 08:34:56   #
Mickey Mantle Loc: New York City
 
I know. We are all lost in a hopeless syndrome and cannot fight it

Reply
Sep 29, 2014 08:55:24   #
Kmgw9v Loc: Miami, Florida
 
Frank W wrote:
You just wait, it'll come back. There's no cure, remember. :-)


:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

Reply
Sep 29, 2014 08:56:12   #
MMC Loc: Brooklyn NY
 
Do not believe.
Mickey Mantle wrote:
Now my GAS is complete. Nothing else to wish for or want.

Reply
 
 
Sep 29, 2014 08:59:10   #
DavidPine Loc: Fredericksburg, TX
 
You won't regret it!

Reply
Sep 29, 2014 09:38:43   #
Hershel Loc: New York City
 
Mickey Mantle wrote:
Hi Guys

Finally did it. Completed the "HOLY TRINITY". GOT the 70-200 2.8. Will arrive on Tuesday from B&H. In time to shoot the leaved changing. Can't wait. The 24-70 and 14-24 are my two favorite lenses.


Thank you for your patronage. Hope you enjoy the lens!

HERSHEL

Reply
Sep 29, 2014 10:06:38   #
skiman Loc: Ventura, CA
 
Mickey Mantle wrote:
Now my GAS is complete. Nothing else to wish for or want.

You already had a D810 and a D4s to put them on?

Reply
Sep 29, 2014 10:38:25   #
amehta Loc: Boston
 
Brucej67 wrote:
How about an "E" lens, say an Nikon 300mm F2.8 or a 500mm F4?

:twisted: :thumbup: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Mickey, look at my galleries. ;-)

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 5 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.