Check out Smartphone Photography section of our forum.
Lightroom basic adjustments panel mix-up.
Sep 14, 2014 13:10:28 #
Hi folks,
I have two photos here that were shot four minutes apart. when I open them in LR 5.6, the options in the basic panel are different, one has the older Recovery, Fill light, and and Blacks options while the other has the newer Highlights, Shadows, Whites and Blacks options. Any ideas as to why this might be?
Thanks.
I have two photos here that were shot four minutes apart. when I open them in LR 5.6, the options in the basic panel are different, one has the older Recovery, Fill light, and and Blacks options while the other has the newer Highlights, Shadows, Whites and Blacks options. Any ideas as to why this might be?
Thanks.
Sep 14, 2014 14:03:01 #
Never seen that before but easily corrected - in the Develop Module, scroll down to Camera Calibration, click on the Process section and choose 2012 (Current).
Sep 14, 2014 15:54:13 #
Searcher wrote:
Never seen that before but easily corrected - in the Develop Module, scroll down to Camera Calibration, click on the Process section and choose 2012 (Current).
Thanks Searcher,
I knew that there as a way to change the process, but I couldn't remember where it was.
Check out True Macro-Photography Forum section of our forum.
Sep 15, 2014 10:14:42 #
Searcher wrote:
Never seen that before but easily corrected - in the Develop Module, scroll down to Camera Calibration, click on the Process section and choose 2012 (Current).
Just trying to figure out how that would happen. My only guess so far is that the preset applied differed. Could that have happened? Perhaps on import?
Sep 15, 2014 10:44:44 #
MtnMan wrote:
Just trying to figure out how that would happen. My only guess so far is that the preset applied differed. Could that have happened? Perhaps on import?
I don't know, I have tried to make it happen, and the way I have found is to change the setting, close and reopen LR and 3 out of 5 times it opened in the latest version. If I reopened the image in which I set the older process, then LR changed to the older process, so I guess it must be written into the metadata.
Sep 15, 2014 10:45:54 #
I may know how it happened. I took these when I first got back into photography and at the time I was using PSE 10 for post. I had done some work on the shot of the bridge in elements and I don't think that I ever touched the other one. So, in bringing them into LR, could the bridge shot carried over the older PSE 10 process while the other shot having not seen PSE, just acted normally?
Yes, the ACR in PSE 10 was I think the older process.
Yes, the ACR in PSE 10 was I think the older process.
Sep 15, 2014 11:39:40 #
Erik_H wrote:
I may know how it happened. I took these when I first got back into photography and at the time I was using PSE 10 for post. I had done some work on the shot of the bridge in elements and I don't think that I ever touched the other one. So, in bringing them into LR, could the bridge shot carried over the older PSE 10 process while the other shot having not seen PSE, just acted normally?
Yes, the ACR in PSE 10 was I think the older process.
Yes, the ACR in PSE 10 was I think the older process.
Seems reasonable to me.
Check out Astronomical Photography Forum section of our forum.
Sep 15, 2014 18:19:34 #
You must have accidently changed the process version to 2010 on the second image.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.