BboH
Loc: s of 2/21, Ellicott City, MD
Its a project I set for myself, for no other reason than curiosity.
And what UtahBob said about the no parallax setting for panoramas is quite correct when using a panorama head. The camera and lens have to be positioned at the specific point on the head for which they been calibrated; change the zoom the calibration is gone. This is another subject.
I decided I wanted to be able to see the "reach" of my various lenses and to compare one with another at some random MM setting - yes, I could do this on Nikon's Lens Simulator site but I want my scene. At least two of the mm's on all of my lenses are pretty much duplicated on all EXCEPT for two primes - the 60 and 85mm's which are not duplicated on any other lens.
I extrapolated this project into some other related areas - I want to see the difference in "reach" of the several Image Area settings and compare the reach of the Full Frame (D810) to the Crop Frame (D7100) and comparative Angles of View.
Image Area settings - the D810 has 4, using the 28-300 @28mm they are (don't know for sure yet, but I suspect the digital zoom is constant with any focal length):
FX - 35mm focal length = 28, Digital; Zoom = 1
1.2 - 35mm focal length = 1.2, Digital Zoom = 33
DX - 35mm Focal Length = 42, Digital Zoom = 1.53
5:4 - 35mm Focal Length = 30, Digital Zoom = 1.13
So, these are the projects for which I asked the question.
And, I do appreciate your thoughts - thanks
davidrb
Loc: Half way there on the 45th Parallel
UtahBob wrote:
Would you mind expanding your thoughts - I'm missing what you are getting at or perhaps your subjects are very different than mine. Thanks.
My thoughts are to capture the image I have envisioned. Approximately 60% of my photography is nature, mostly in woodlands. I shoot from a tripod when able and I am very conscious of my placement. I do what is commonly referred to as "zooming with my feet." In my pursuit of a particular image I know the size of the subject, how much DoF I want to use, what SS will be applicable in the environment. Using that information I know which lens to select and exactly how far I want my sensor to be from the subject. I used to use a zoom, Canon's EF 24-105mm f/4.0L IS and could not bet comfortable with my photographs. They were not what I wanted and what I thought I was seeing in the view finder. I like the lens very much, it is one of Canon true soldiers. But, it is a zoom. I was bringing my subject to me and lost perspective of it's size and placement in it's surroundings. I also did not develop the ability to see the subject in a different perspective. There are huge differences between bringing the subject to you v. you going to the subject. Not good, not bad, just different. One allowed me to get the results I sought. I pursue that method.
UtahBob wrote:
And some are white and some are black ...
But they're all made out of ticky-tacky and they all look just the same.
Initially I agreed with Wahawk and CaptC, who cares what mm? Just frame and shoot. Now that we know the
why behind the question it makes sense. I've done it when I wanted to compare a 135mm prime lens to the 135mm setting on a 70-200 zoom.
Since this a rainy-day project, tether to a computer, take a few seconds to chimp the exif data on the computer, adjust as necessary and charge on!
davidrb wrote:
My thoughts are to capture the image I have envisioned. Approximately 60% of my photography is nature, mostly in woodlands. I shoot from a tripod when able and I am very conscious of my placement. I do what is commonly referred to as "zooming with my feet." In my pursuit of a particular image I know the size of the subject, how much DoF I want to use, what SS will be applicable in the environment. Using that information I know which lens to select and exactly how far I want my sensor to be from the subject. I used to use a zoom, Canon's EF 24-105mm f/4.0L IS and could not bet comfortable with my photographs. They were not what I wanted and what I thought I was seeing in the view finder. I like the lens very much, it is one of Canon true soldiers. But, it is a zoom. I was bringing my subject to me and lost perspective of it's size and placement in it's surroundings. I also did not develop the ability to see the subject in a different perspective. There are huge differences between bringing the subject to you v. you going to the subject. Not good, not bad, just different. One allowed me to get the results I sought. I pursue that method.
My thoughts are to capture the image I have envisi... (
show quote)
Kind of what I thought, sounds a bit what I experienced this weekend using a 35mm prime that was a bit more MMs than I needed but I could only back up so far until I got to an electrified fence. :shock:
I like that 35mm maybe for the same reasons you've expressed. I think I get it.
After all of this, it is still more of a 'technical' engineering point than anything of real value to most photographers.
Learn your equipment, SEE the image in the viewfinder or view screen and work to make the image what you see in your mind!
Most every camera and lens combination will be different in their results at any given point, so just go out and shoot and enjoy!
BHC
Loc: Strawberry Valley, JF, USA
BboH wrote:
Zoom lenses, as all know, have MM settings on the barrel.
Is there any way, before taking the picture to ascertain what the MM setting is when the zoom is set between 2 of the markings on the barrel? I have searched and cannot find a way to do so (the EXIF data created when the image is taken shows the MM, but that's after the fact) - figured maybe there is a way that I can't find, hope so but...
I'm using Nikon's D810 and D7100 and various Nikon lenses.
Thanks
After all is said and done, there is a way to calculate the amount of zoom. But to do so requires specialized equipment and, for precise determination, some surveying tools. Do you want to go to that much trouble for everyday pictures or even for one-time calibration? If so, I will go into details, but you can probably figure them out for yourself knowing that the angle of view can lead you to determination of the lens focal length.
CaptainC wrote:
Makes sense.
Just an observation....(with a smile)
When people post pictures, I see exposure, shutter speed and focal length. I know this comes from their data, as per this conversation. So the question is, unless your doing MACRO or running a scientific test, oooops sorry engineer test, why is this relevant? (Yes I know the answer, just being a devils advocate.)
Hi Bob, on my camera (OlympusEPL-5) the focal length my zoom is at, is indicated fleetingly in the viewer, I thought most DSLR's did that. I can usually estimate it quite well, eg: if I want 20mm I set the lens at just past 18mm.
I know it's not that simple at longer lengths but it's the frames that really matter.
John.
BboH
Loc: s of 2/21, Ellicott City, MD
Have no idea whether there are lessons to be learned or just facts to observe, whichever I expect to have fun and satisfy my curiosity while finding out. Thanks all - I greatly appreciate.
Bye the way I'm a retired insurance agent.
BboH wrote:
......
Bye the way I'm a retired insurance agent.
Thats OK, we won't hold that against you.
You can sit on that bench over there with the politicians, drug dealers, rapists, executioners and lawyers.
I just hope they don't complain.
:lol: :wink: :roll:
lighthouse wrote:
Thats OK, we won't hold that against you.
You can sit on that bench over there with the politicians, drug dealers, rapists, executioners and lawyers.
I just hope they don't complain.
:lol: :wink: :roll:
I don't know why you would put lawyers on that bench, after all, it's only 99% of them that give the rest a bad name.......
CaptainC wrote:
Been doing this for 50+ years and never wondered or cared. All that matters is what you see in the finder.So I just wonder why anyone would care.
Not a criticism - but why do you care?
=============================
In the "Film Era"....
Just about everything was "after the fact"...
The "recorded image" (all of them) was running around in my brain till I got to the darkroom to Create the Print. I still to this day, after capturing an image have this ability to See in my minds eye, the images of the day. I really do not have a need for the LCD to know that I got the photo I want. ((However.. It is a nice thing to have.. ))
UtahBob wrote:
I can see perhaps the case where you wish to shoot a panorama (an equirectangular for instance) and you've planned to shoot it at a particular mm to achieve either a certain image size or shots to take around on a row(s). Zooms will often have a changing no parallax point so you might want to identify a mm setting and the associated mount point on the pano head. In either case, I'd be marking the barrel appropriately.
I can see this being a concern with a super wide angle zoom used for interior sphericals where close objects require a good level of precision to avoid parallax and you would want repeatability on the zoom setting if not at the max or min.
Probably not the reason the OP is asking but one reason I might want to know or be able to repeat the setting.
I can see perhaps the case where you wish to shoot... (
show quote)
Even these reasons I do not understand. Adjust your shot and just don't change the zoom till you are done.
Am I still missing something? The only reason I am following this thread is, like the CaptainC, I am trying to find a purpose.
Jim D
davidrb wrote:
My thoughts are to capture the image I have envisioned. Approximately 60% of my photography is nature, mostly in woodlands. I shoot from a tripod when able and I am very conscious of my placement. I do what is commonly referred to as "zooming with my feet." In my pursuit of a particular image I know the size of the subject, how much DoF I want to use, what SS will be applicable in the environment. Using that information I know which lens to select and exactly how far I want my sensor to be from the subject. I used to use a zoom, Canon's EF 24-105mm f/4.0L IS and could not bet comfortable with my photographs. They were not what I wanted and what I thought I was seeing in the view finder. I like the lens very much, it is one of Canon true soldiers. But, it is a zoom. I was bringing my subject to me and lost perspective of it's size and placement in it's surroundings. I also did not develop the ability to see the subject in a different perspective. There are huge differences between bringing the subject to you v. you going to the subject. Not good, not bad, just different. One allowed me to get the results I sought. I pursue that method.
My thoughts are to capture the image I have envisi... (
show quote)
I just saw this and still do not totally understand.
BboH
Loc: s of 2/21, Ellicott City, MD
lighthouse wrote:
Thats OK, we won't hold that against you.
You can sit on that bench over there with the politicians, drug dealers, rapists, executioners and lawyers.
I just hope they don't complain.
:lol: :wink: :roll:
Sounds like you didn't hear what you wanted to hear. :-D
BboH
Loc: s of 2/21, Ellicott City, MD
oldtool2 wrote:
Even these reasons I do not understand. Adjust your shot and just don't change the zoom till you are done.
Am I still missing something? The only reason I am following this thread is, like the CaptainC, I am trying to find a purpose.
Jim D
To me, the key point in Utah's reply is "...repeat the setting..."
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.