If i was considering being a pro photographer should i have a full frame or is a DX o.k. i hope i'm asking this ? right i am a rookie with big dreams
I'd first get a DX to learn the craft.
omnila wrote:
If i was considering being a pro photographer should i have a full frame or is a DX o.k. i hope i'm asking this ? right i am a rookie with big dreams
If you can afford a quality full frame digital--go for it. There are a lot more rugged and better optical lenses in ff size...methinks.
omnila wrote:
If i was considering being a pro photographer should i have a full frame or is a DX o.k. i hope i'm asking this ? right i am a rookie with big dreams
I believe that you already have a DX camera, which is a fine format for learning all the basics for professional photography. When the time comes that you are limited by a DX format, you will know it. THAT is the time to consider an FX camera.
Nikonian72 wrote:
omnila wrote:
If i was considering being a pro photographer should i have a full frame or is a DX o.k. i hope i'm asking this ? right i am a rookie with big dreams
I believe that you already have a DX camera, which is a fine format for learning all the basics for professional photography. When the time comes that you are limited by a DX format, you will know it. THAT is the time to consider an FX camera.
Thanks Nikonian i was just wondering if it is a required thing are can a guy get away with a Dx. And yes i have theD7000 and am really happy with it.As far as learning the craft i don't think anyone in reality ever stops learning. thanks again guys
Doesn't matter. I would defy anyone to tell me whether one of my images was shot with the D3 or D7000.
You have far more important things to worry about than FX v DX.
Thanks captainc your the man omnila
I totaly agree, there are quality lenses made for DX as well as FF and it is the photographer who makes the diffrence not the equipment.
CaptainC wrote:
Doesn't matter. I would defy anyone to tell me whether one of my images was shot with the D3 or D7000.
You have far more important things to worry about than FX v DX.
CaptainC wrote:
Doesn't matter. I would defy anyone to tell me whether one of my images was shot with the D3 or D7000.
You have far more important things to worry about than FX v DX.
perfectly written. i have a 5d and a 7d and say the same thing.
omnila wrote:
If i was considering being a pro photographer should i have a full frame or is a DX o.k. i hope i'm asking this ? right i am a rookie with big dreams
No sense in turning them into nightmares. Why spend thousands more now, you may decide that photography for a living isn't for you. But if it is you can always move up to more expensive equipment, and your D7000 is excellent back up anyway.
.
The D7000 is an excellent camera and unless you turn in a professional sports photographer where you need faster tracking you already have the perfect camera to help fulfill your dreams
BboH
Loc: s of 2/21, Ellicott City, MD
CaptainC wrote:
Doesn't matter. I would defy anyone to tell me whether one of my images was shot with the D3 or D7000.
You have far more important things to worry about than FX v DX.
I agree with "Doesn't matter..." as a general rule. I have both a D3(FX) and a D300(DX). I use the D300 when I want the crop factor, the D3 when I want the better detail, otherwise they are interchangable.
you said it , i'm surprised people still look at full frame like they do , my 4/3rds E-5 beat out 128 photo's taken mostly by nikon or canon
CaptainC wrote:
Doesn't matter. I would defy anyone to tell me whether one of my images was shot with the D3 or D7000.
You have far more important things to worry about than FX v DX.
I moved from the D70 to the D7000 last year and am quite happy, so what's my problem?
I listen to photographers with more experience and learn more everyday. That not the problem.
In October, my best photographer friend told me to buy the D700 and 24-70 and 70-200 full frame lenses. Maybe $7000. I tried to buy them at half price from some on-line sites. Success: I cancelled the orders when the first flag went up. But I respected my friend's advice so much I never stopped shopping.
Well I'm now blessed by the D800 not being available as it would make the D700 out of date. I'm dreading next week when it may be announced in Japan.
But UHH has some great information from some knowledgeable subscribers. And I am married and get more good advice on purchases.
But my experience and skills are still increasing as happy D7000 guy with a cheaper ($1000) lens. I sold all of my older lenses on Amazon and put the remaining proceeds into a savings account after buying a micro and a wide angle lens.
Thank you for making me $7000 wealthier although it may not last.
biggest advantage of full frame over crop sensor is the high iso ability. my 7d, i can shoot up to 800 iso, sometimes 1600 and have a very low noise image.....my 5d is great to 3200 iso.
in a very low light situation....get great photos every time with no flash with the 5d. but the 5d autofocus in low light sucks compared to the 7d...........hopefully a new 5d comes out.
always a trade off!!!
if i had to do it all over, i would not have spent the bucks on the 5d and kept adding to my L lens collection!!! i did buy the 5d after the 7d.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.