Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
dx or full frame
Page 1 of 2 next>
Jan 31, 2012 15:11:59   #
omnila
 
If i was considering being a pro photographer should i have a full frame or is a DX o.k. i hope i'm asking this ? right i am a rookie with big dreams

Reply
Jan 31, 2012 17:30:12   #
snowbear
 
I'd first get a DX to learn the craft.

Reply
Jan 31, 2012 17:58:16   #
tkhphotography Loc: Gresham, Or, not Seattle
 
omnila wrote:
If i was considering being a pro photographer should i have a full frame or is a DX o.k. i hope i'm asking this ? right i am a rookie with big dreams


If you can afford a quality full frame digital--go for it. There are a lot more rugged and better optical lenses in ff size...methinks.

Reply
 
 
Jan 31, 2012 19:19:48   #
Nikonian72 Loc: Chico CA
 
omnila wrote:
If i was considering being a pro photographer should i have a full frame or is a DX o.k. i hope i'm asking this ? right i am a rookie with big dreams

I believe that you already have a DX camera, which is a fine format for learning all the basics for professional photography. When the time comes that you are limited by a DX format, you will know it. THAT is the time to consider an FX camera.

Reply
Jan 31, 2012 20:06:18   #
omnila
 
Nikonian72 wrote:
omnila wrote:
If i was considering being a pro photographer should i have a full frame or is a DX o.k. i hope i'm asking this ? right i am a rookie with big dreams

I believe that you already have a DX camera, which is a fine format for learning all the basics for professional photography. When the time comes that you are limited by a DX format, you will know it. THAT is the time to consider an FX camera.

Thanks Nikonian i was just wondering if it is a required thing are can a guy get away with a Dx. And yes i have theD7000 and am really happy with it.As far as learning the craft i don't think anyone in reality ever stops learning. thanks again guys

Reply
Jan 31, 2012 20:43:00   #
CaptainC Loc: Colorado, south of Denver
 
Doesn't matter. I would defy anyone to tell me whether one of my images was shot with the D3 or D7000.

You have far more important things to worry about than FX v DX.

Reply
Jan 31, 2012 20:46:21   #
omnila
 
Thanks captainc your the man omnila

Reply
 
 
Feb 1, 2012 05:43:39   #
Brucej67 Loc: Cary, NC
 
I totaly agree, there are quality lenses made for DX as well as FF and it is the photographer who makes the diffrence not the equipment.

CaptainC wrote:
Doesn't matter. I would defy anyone to tell me whether one of my images was shot with the D3 or D7000.

You have far more important things to worry about than FX v DX.

Reply
Feb 1, 2012 08:12:31   #
jerryc41 Loc: Catskill Mts of NY
 
omnila wrote:
If i was considering being a pro photographer should i have a full frame or is a DX o.k. i hope i'm asking this ? right i am a rookie with big dreams

My general advice to anyone about anything is to read articles on the web. You will find some junk, but be selective and read photo sites - kenrockwell.com, etc. You want reviews by "experts" who have experience with both formats.

https://www.google.com/search?q=dx+vs+fx+camera&rls=com.microsoft:en-us:IE-SearchBox&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&sourceid=ie7&rlz=1I7IRFC_en

FX is generally more expensive, both bodies and lenses, so make sure it will be worth your while to make that commitment.

Reply
Feb 1, 2012 08:21:53   #
jimberton Loc: Michigan's Upper Peninsula
 
CaptainC wrote:
Doesn't matter. I would defy anyone to tell me whether one of my images was shot with the D3 or D7000.

You have far more important things to worry about than FX v DX.


perfectly written. i have a 5d and a 7d and say the same thing.

Reply
Feb 1, 2012 09:08:42   #
Wabbit Loc: Arizona Desert
 
omnila wrote:
If i was considering being a pro photographer should i have a full frame or is a DX o.k. i hope i'm asking this ? right i am a rookie with big dreams


No sense in turning them into nightmares. Why spend thousands more now, you may decide that photography for a living isn't for you. But if it is you can always move up to more expensive equipment, and your D7000 is excellent back up anyway.
.
The D7000 is an excellent camera and unless you turn in a professional sports photographer where you need faster tracking you already have the perfect camera to help fulfill your dreams

Reply
 
 
Feb 1, 2012 09:53:09   #
BboH Loc: s of 2/21, Ellicott City, MD
 
CaptainC wrote:
Doesn't matter. I would defy anyone to tell me whether one of my images was shot with the D3 or D7000.

You have far more important things to worry about than FX v DX.


I agree with "Doesn't matter..." as a general rule. I have both a D3(FX) and a D300(DX). I use the D300 when I want the crop factor, the D3 when I want the better detail, otherwise they are interchangable.

Reply
Feb 1, 2012 10:01:28   #
mrhotel
 
you said it , i'm surprised people still look at full frame like they do , my 4/3rds E-5 beat out 128 photo's taken mostly by nikon or canon
CaptainC wrote:
Doesn't matter. I would defy anyone to tell me whether one of my images was shot with the D3 or D7000.

You have far more important things to worry about than FX v DX.

Reply
Feb 1, 2012 10:05:42   #
profpb Loc: Venice, Florida
 
I moved from the D70 to the D7000 last year and am quite happy, so what's my problem?

I listen to photographers with more experience and learn more everyday. That not the problem.

In October, my best photographer friend told me to buy the D700 and 24-70 and 70-200 full frame lenses. Maybe $7000. I tried to buy them at half price from some on-line sites. Success: I cancelled the orders when the first flag went up. But I respected my friend's advice so much I never stopped shopping.

Well I'm now blessed by the D800 not being available as it would make the D700 out of date. I'm dreading next week when it may be announced in Japan.

But UHH has some great information from some knowledgeable subscribers. And I am married and get more good advice on purchases.

But my experience and skills are still increasing as happy D7000 guy with a cheaper ($1000) lens. I sold all of my older lenses on Amazon and put the remaining proceeds into a savings account after buying a micro and a wide angle lens.

Thank you for making me $7000 wealthier although it may not last.

Reply
Feb 1, 2012 10:36:56   #
jimberton Loc: Michigan's Upper Peninsula
 
biggest advantage of full frame over crop sensor is the high iso ability. my 7d, i can shoot up to 800 iso, sometimes 1600 and have a very low noise image.....my 5d is great to 3200 iso.

in a very low light situation....get great photos every time with no flash with the 5d. but the 5d autofocus in low light sucks compared to the 7d...........hopefully a new 5d comes out.

always a trade off!!!

if i had to do it all over, i would not have spent the bucks on the 5d and kept adding to my L lens collection!!! i did buy the 5d after the 7d.

Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.