sumo wrote:
first of all I find it amazing that none of you leftist addressed the article that started this thread
.you only attack the messenger..secondly I dont think you are an American, you are under some sort of illusion or disguise
Rather odd how you name only the people that I would actually vote for
.you left wing nut jobs are destroying this nation
..
too bad we cant divide the nation in half and you leftist could have either half, I would take the other
..only problem with that is than in 5 years (or less), you would want to come to my side because your side would be a ghetto, but you would still have some great theories on how things should work, but dont.
...
arguing with a liberal is certainly a waste of time
.Arguments involve the presentation of facts and evidence from which one draws a conclusion. Implied within the concept of an argument is the potential that one might change his conclusion. But liberals start with the conclusion.
They dont change their conclusions based on the facts and evidence; they change the facts and evidence based on the conclusion they want. This is why a 105 degree day is irrefutable proof of global warming, while a 60 degree day is irrefutable proof of global warming. As is a -20 degree day.
If you're trying to win an Oxford Union debate with a liberal, you are just not gonna do it
. This isn't about the Marquess of Queensberrys fussy little rules. This is about fighting for our way of life and our fundamental rights against the intellectual heirs of Stalin, Mao and Hitler.
Attack. This is about winning. First prize is freedom. Second prize is tyranny.
first of all I find it amazing that none of you le... (
show quote)
Wow! I really did touch a nerve! All I can say is God help us all if people like you gain any real traction. Thanks for displaying your hate and ignorance for all to see.