11 Western States
Jul 5, 2014 15:53:46 #
57states
Loc: I Peregrinate
The feds want to put the grouse in protection for 165 million acres
in 11 states, in 2015. How many jobs would be lost.
Will the feds be dancing with this one?
How could it affect the senators of those states for election?
:shock: :oops: :cry: :roll: ;-) :thumbdown:
What do I know?
in 11 states, in 2015. How many jobs would be lost.
Will the feds be dancing with this one?
How could it affect the senators of those states for election?
:shock: :oops: :cry: :roll: ;-) :thumbdown:
What do I know?
Jul 5, 2014 15:56:31 #
57states wrote:
The feds want to put the grouse in protection for 165 million acres in 11 states, in 2015.
Have the Feds gotten to the point where all humans will have to move out of those states?
Or is this just a ruse to let children from points south to start a new republic?
Hard to figure these days.
Jul 5, 2014 17:37:00 #
The Pygmy Owl is listed as a endangered species. There are not many in the U S.
There are a lot in Mexico and Central America.
There are a lot in Mexico and Central America.
Jul 5, 2014 19:50:58 #
I've an idea.
Read about it first, then criticize it after you know what it is.
http://www.sagegrouseinitiative.com/our-work/proactive-conservation/
Read about it first, then criticize it after you know what it is.
http://www.sagegrouseinitiative.com/our-work/proactive-conservation/
Jul 5, 2014 21:02:35 #
Frank T wrote:
I've an idea.
Read about it first, then criticize it after you know what it is.
http://www.sagegrouseinitiative.com/our-work/proactive-conservation/
Read about it first, then criticize it after you know what it is.
http://www.sagegrouseinitiative.com/our-work/proactive-conservation/
An opposing view.
http://www.defendersblog.org/2014/06/sage-grouse-crosshairs/
Jul 5, 2014 22:53:28 #
I've read both and am not sure how exactly they counter each other.
Regardless, this line stands out;"Any Congressional effort to extend the current timeline would subvert the established science-based administrative process the Fish and Wildlife Service uses for determining whether a species warrants protection under the Endangered Species Act. "
The whole stir over "global warming" is causing a lot of people who didn't before to question the science behind Federal science-based processes. This case may be suspect also.
Regardless, this line stands out;"Any Congressional effort to extend the current timeline would subvert the established science-based administrative process the Fish and Wildlife Service uses for determining whether a species warrants protection under the Endangered Species Act. "
The whole stir over "global warming" is causing a lot of people who didn't before to question the science behind Federal science-based processes. This case may be suspect also.
Jul 6, 2014 07:52:22 #
ole sarg
Loc: south florida
Why would one do something as rational as that? These guys live by ready shoot aim!
Frank T wrote:
I've an idea.
Read about it first, then criticize it after you know what it is.
http://www.sagegrouseinitiative.com/our-work/proactive-conservation/
Read about it first, then criticize it after you know what it is.
http://www.sagegrouseinitiative.com/our-work/proactive-conservation/
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.