Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Check out Digital Artistry section of our forum.
Main Photography Discussion
Help on Good Camera for Daughter
Page <prev 2 of 4 next> last>>
Jun 4, 2014 08:50:20   #
Brandmic Loc: Alabama
 
I have the d7100 and several lens but a great general lens is the 35mm f/1.8 for around $200. Has great reviews. Also the 50mm f1.4 is a great low light and portrait lens with crop 35mm equiv of 75mm and was ranked as one of the top 5 lens in several reviews.

Reply
Jun 4, 2014 09:42:36   #
sr71 Loc: In Col. Juan Seguin Land
 
Second recommendation of the Panasonic GH-4, much better at Video than the others also take a look at the GH-3.....


Cdouthitt wrote:
The best option for videography is the new gh4. Hands down...and the stills aren't too shabby

http://www.thephoblographer.com/2014/05/27/panasonic-gh4-autofocus-speed-found-close-nikon-d4s/

Reply
Jun 4, 2014 09:47:44   #
dcampbell52 Loc: Clearwater Fl
 
Mogul wrote:
Who's putting up the money?!?!!?


I vote for the D7100 but I am prejudiced by my owning one and my affiliation with Nikon. I will say that the D7100 has very good all around qualities and can shoot good video. If shooting video though, if sound is important, I highly recommend getting the microphone attachment and putting an extension cable on it and getting it off of the camera. (you can hear the camera auto-focusing and every other noise with the on camera mics. ) Also a tripod is strongly recommended for video.. my video shots of the wife feeding seagulls were bouncing all over the place in 1080p. nice but nothing to write home about. I will say that the video problems were the photographer, not the camera.

Reply
Check out Traditional Street and Architectural Photography section of our forum.
Jun 4, 2014 10:46:56   #
Brandmic Loc: Alabama
 
Agree. I have the d 7100 as well.

Reply
Jun 4, 2014 11:04:15   #
13oct1931 Loc: Lebanon, Indiana
 
Experience is hard to beat. But, here is a bit of advice from an I.U. grad (BA '58) take a look at the new OMD models from OLYMPUS. Go to the factory website, then go to a dealer. Alyn

Reply
Jun 4, 2014 11:32:40   #
pappy0352 Loc: Oregon
 
Take a little time and check out the Canon 60D, I use this camera and love it.

Pappy

Reply
Jun 4, 2014 11:39:59   #
CHOLLY Loc: THE FLORIDA PANHANDLE!
 
Sony A77II has the BEST video capabilities of all the cameras mentioned so far. :thumbup:

Reply
Check out True Macro-Photography Forum section of our forum.
Jun 4, 2014 11:46:53   #
BullMoose Loc: Southwest Michigan
 
Her boss has suggested that the Canon (probably the EOS 70D) will do a better job with video and that has been confirmed at our local ....



Probably should be a consideration.

Reply
Jun 4, 2014 12:05:49   #
CraigFair Loc: Santa Maria, CA.
 
Her primary emphasis will be on still photography for publication quality shots

I would recogmend the Nikon D610 it's the grown-up version of the D7100 with all the features and the Full Frame Sensor.
It is a much set-up for her Photography & Video needs that you describe.
Craig
D600

Reply
Jun 4, 2014 12:06:50   #
CraigFair Loc: Santa Maria, CA.
 
Her primary emphasis will be on still photography for publication quality shots

I would recogmend the Nikon D610 it's the grown-up version of the D7100 with all the features and the Full Frame Sensor.
It is a much better set-up for her Photography & Video needs that you describe.
Craig
D600

Reply
Jun 4, 2014 12:10:10   #
dcampbell52 Loc: Clearwater Fl
 
CraigFair wrote:
Her primary emphasis will be on still photography for publication quality shots

I would recogmend the Nikon D610 it's the grown-up version of the D7100 with all the features and the Full Frame Sensor.
It is a much better set-up for her Photography & Video needs that you describe.
Craig
D600


:thumbup: :thumbup:

Reply
 
 
Jun 4, 2014 12:21:29   #
dennis2146 Loc: Eastern Idaho
 
I think I would stick with Nikon and go with the D7100. If the Canon does take better video I would ask how much better. I doubt the D7100 is any slouch. I don't do video but the couple of short videos taken with my D7000 have looked just fine to me. I agree with another poster above that if she really needs a video camera it might be better to get a video camera as well as the D7100.

I think the lenses you chose will work fine. I would get a fast 35 over the 50.

Dennis

Reply
Jun 4, 2014 12:40:41   #
amehta Loc: Boston
 
nervous2 wrote:
My youngest daughter just returned for summer from Indiana U where she is in a graduate program in folklore (I know, who will support me in my old age?). She works in the Traditional Arts Indiana program and needs a pretty good quality camera for publication purposes in this program and beyond. We have been a Nikon family since I purchased my first TTL metering Nikon F in 1965 and I have encouraged her to look at the D7100 with 18-140mm kit lens and a good 35mm or 50mm prime as a start. Her primary emphasis will be on still photography for publication quality shots, but she also wants to get into videography. Her boss has suggested that the Canon (probably the EOS 70D) will do a better job with video and that has been confirmed at our local camera store. I have assured her that she should get what suits her best and if that is the Canon, I will probably put her back in the will within a few years. I would appreciate any thoughts of my fellow hedgehoggers as to which direction she should head. And if that is Canon, some suggestion as to comparable lenses to what I was suggesting for Nikon. I know nothing about the Canon line-up and I am helpless about giving good advice in that regard. At least if she chooses Canon I will not be having to lend her my expensive specialty lenses. As always, thanks a bunch.
My youngest daughter just returned for summer from... (show quote)

It might make sense to hold off on the prime lens for now. Let her use the camera for a little while and figure out which prime she would most benefit from. It seems that people find the "nifty-fifty" either awesome or useless, so getting the 35mm f/1.8 DX might be jumping the gun. Just getting a fast lens for the sake of having a fast lens seems odd to me.

Reply
Jun 4, 2014 13:02:46   #
Reinaldokool Loc: San Rafael, CA
 
nervous2 wrote:
My youngest daughter just returned for summer from Indiana U where she is in a graduate program in folklore (I know, who will support me in my old age?). She works in the Traditional Arts Indiana program and needs a pretty good quality camera for publication purposes in this program and beyond. We have been a Nikon family since I purchased my first TTL metering Nikon F in 1965 and I have encouraged her to look at the D7100 with 18-140mm kit lens and a good 35mm or 50mm prime as a start. Her primary emphasis will be on still photography for publication quality shots, but she also wants to get into videography. Her boss has suggested that the Canon (probably the EOS 70D) will do a better job with video and that has been confirmed at our local camera store. I have assured her that she should get what suits her best and if that is the Canon, I will probably put her back in the will within a few years. I would appreciate any thoughts of my fellow hedgehoggers as to which direction she should head. And if that is Canon, some suggestion as to comparable lenses to what I was suggesting for Nikon. I know nothing about the Canon line-up and I am helpless about giving good advice in that regard. At least if she chooses Canon I will not be having to lend her my expensive specialty lenses. As always, thanks a bunch.
My youngest daughter just returned for summer from... (show quote)


Canon does a great job but not better than the Nikon D7100 unless you go to the full-frame or professional prices. My D7000 does a quite respectable video and the D7100 is even better.

With few exceptions (A few camera stores which cater to professionals) The camera store will recommend what they have the most stock or make the most markup. Their salespeople generally have little knowledge. Their recommendations mean nothing.

Reply
Jun 4, 2014 13:15:35   #
dcampbell52 Loc: Clearwater Fl
 
Reinaldokool wrote:
Canon does a great job but not better than the Nikon D7100 unless you go to the full-frame or professional prices. My D7000 does a quite respectable video and the D7100 is even better.

With few exceptions (A few camera stores which cater to professionals) The camera store will recommend what they have the most stock or make the most markup. Their salespeople generally have little knowledge. Their recommendations mean nothing.


I agree... My wife purchased the Tamron 10-24mm for me for my Bday... I wanted the Nikon (considerably more and the tamron is ok) but the Camera Store didn't have the Nikon in stock... they had loads of Tamron... and convinced her it was a better lens... Not because it was but they had it.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 4 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out Astronomical Photography Forum section of our forum.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.