Macro
May 24, 2014 12:04:16 #
Ok, I have a Nikon D7100. I want to get a good Macro lens for extreme close ups, things like flower petals, bugs, etc. I really do not know anything about Macro and need an idea of what size lens to buy. Thanks in advance for your suggestions.
May 24, 2014 12:41:32 #
collins9000 wrote:
Ok, I have a Nikon D7100. I want to get a good Macro lens for extreme close ups, things like flower petals, bugs, etc. I really do not know anything about Macro and need an idea of what size lens to buy. Thanks in advance for your suggestions.
I have a 7100. I just bought the Nikon 105mm
micro lens to go with it. It seems to be a very popular
choice. I haven't had it long enough to recommend it.
May 24, 2014 13:52:52 #
RWR
Loc: La Mesa, CA
collins9000 wrote:
Ok, I have a Nikon D7100. I want to get a good Macro lens for extreme close ups, things like flower petals, bugs, etc. I really do not know anything about Macro and need an idea of what size lens to buy. Thanks in advance for your suggestions.
You might try the macro forum for more specialized information:
http://www.uglyhedgehog.com/s-102-1.html
For insects you'll want a lens in the 100-200mm range, to get enough working room between the lens and subject. Since you are just starting out, I would suggest you use the lenses you have, including zooms, with extension tubes. You won't get the best resolution, but as you learn the techniques you will discover what you need and make a wiser decision when purchasing a quality macro lens. This is a pretty specialized field, you'll love it. Let us know how you progress. :)
May 24, 2014 14:53:34 #
Please drop by the True Macro-Photography Forum at http://www.uglyhedgehog.com/s-102-1.html . We have members who are successfully using the following macro lenses: Tamron 90mm, Canon 100mm, Tokina 100mm, Nikkor 105mm, Sigma 105mm, which are in the recommended range for field macro-photography. Other macro lengths exist. Read this for comparison of macro focal lengths:
FAQ: Why are there macro lenses of different focal lengths?
http://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-83141-1.html
FAQ: Why are there macro lenses of different focal lengths?
http://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-83141-1.html
May 25, 2014 07:23:13 #
my advice, buy the Nikon 105 2.8 mm Macro, I"ve owned mine, since 2007, and gotten beautiful results, with it, here are some examples, of what that lens, can do.......
collins9000 wrote:
Ok, I have a Nikon D7100. I want to get a good Macro lens for extreme close ups, things like flower petals, bugs, etc. I really do not know anything about Macro and need an idea of what size lens to buy. Thanks in advance for your suggestions.
May 25, 2014 07:42:03 #
105 Nikon is a sure bet. It's not just a good macro lens, it's a great portrait lens.
May 25, 2014 07:46:39 #
yes, my advice if you purchase this wonderful lens, buy the Nikon Tele 1.4 version 3, which comes out this week, it will allow you to get closer to your subject from a furthur distance, and will work very well, with your new lens......
jimq wrote:
105 Nikon is a sure bet. It's not just a good macro lens, it's a great portrait lens.
May 25, 2014 07:53:57 #
May 25, 2014 07:59:03 #
Excellent advice, but I can tell you this, you will get exceptional beautiful results, with this lens combo.....
Bill gomberg wrote:
Good advice .I would also advise that you rent before you buy.
May 25, 2014 08:35:50 #
Any true macro lens will give you good results. Good macro images are more a result of good technique than they are about what brand the lens is...
May 25, 2014 08:50:31 #
I somewhat disagree, with your assement, as technique , good quality coated glass, as well as a high quality camera, all contribute, to a excellent result, in macro photoraphy, in my opinion....
Screamin Scott wrote:
Any true macro lens will give you good results. Good macro images are more a result of good technique than they are about what brand the lens is...
May 25, 2014 09:23:30 #
lone ranger wrote:
I somewhat disagree, with your assement, as technique , good quality coated glass, as well as a high quality camera, all contribute, to a excellent result, in macro photoraphy, in my opinion....
:thumbup:
May 25, 2014 09:48:19 #
Just bought the Tokina 100mm f/2.8 and in several reviews it rates higher than nikon's 105mm. It's about 1/2 the price of the Nikon 105mm. I use on my d7100. Check the reviews on DxO, Ken Rockwell, etc. it's an incredible lens. Purchased on amazon for less than $400.
May 25, 2014 09:58:13 #
Brandmic wrote:
Just bought the Tokina 100mm f/2.8 and in several reviews it rates higher than nikon's 105mm. It's about 1/2 the price of the Nikon 105mm. I use on my d7100. Check the reviews on DxO, Ken Rockwell, etc. it's an incredible lens. Purchased on amazon for less than $400.
I have no doubt your lens is a great performer.
Some times your paying for the build quality
as well. My 105 weighs a ton. It's built like a tank.
Many of the knock off lenses seem much more
fragile and may not stand up so well to wear and tear.
May 25, 2014 10:08:19 #
I've seen some of your responses in the "True Macro" forum where people have shot with 3rd party lenses & gotten excellent results.... That said, any "true macro" lens will give good results in the hands of someone proficient... I use older manual focus macro lenses from the mid 80's with good results. I'm sure you would likely consider that lens deficient ? I am attaching a couple of quick snaps of some flies I found while walking the dog this morning...Mind you, these flies are only about 4-5mm long... View on download & enlarge & you will also notice the facets of the eyes... BTW, the camera isn't current model either it's a Nikon D300
lone ranger wrote:
I somewhat disagree, with your assement, as technique , good quality coated glass, as well as a high quality camera, all contribute, to a excellent result, in macro photoraphy, in my opinion....
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.