Noah's Ark
May 20, 2014 14:22:51 #
Think Noah's ark could have held this, and its mate, and all other species of its kind or was that Noah's ark thing just a story and not real?
This animal's length, from its head to the tip of its tail, was [130 feet.] Standing with its neck up, it was about [65 feet] high equal to a seven-story building.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/how-do-humans-compare-to-a-dinosaur-seven-stories-tall/2014/05/19/ac9c6852-df73-11e3-9743-bb9b59cde7b9_gallery.html?hpid=z9#item0
The bone below is just the animal's femur or upper leg bone.
This animal's length, from its head to the tip of its tail, was [130 feet.] Standing with its neck up, it was about [65 feet] high equal to a seven-story building.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/how-do-humans-compare-to-a-dinosaur-seven-stories-tall/2014/05/19/ac9c6852-df73-11e3-9743-bb9b59cde7b9_gallery.html?hpid=z9#item0
The bone below is just the animal's femur or upper leg bone.
Largest Dino to date.
May 20, 2014 14:54:55 #
James Shaw wrote:
Think Noah's ark could have held this, and its mate, and all other species of its kind or was that Noah's ark thing just a story and not real?
Excellent point.
May 20, 2014 14:55:57 #
May 20, 2014 19:36:15 #
wilsondl2 wrote:
Could it be that it didn't make it n the ark so it is no more?
Dave
Dave
Good thinking!
May 21, 2014 06:55:45 #
May 21, 2014 07:06:46 #
wilsondl2 wrote:
Could it be that it didn't make it n the ark so it is no more?
Dave
Dave
Yeah, or could it be that they weren't even around when the Ark was built??? Maybe i'm wrong, but i think they were already extinct when it was built.
May 21, 2014 07:55:26 #
siloartist
Loc: Onaga, KS
Besides the possibility of extinction, wouldn't it also be possible that the young from larger animals/reptiles were chosen instead of mature ones?
May 21, 2014 08:01:46 #
May 21, 2014 08:03:42 #
siloartist wrote:
Besides the possibility of extinction, wouldn't it also be possible that the young from larger animals/reptiles were chosen instead of mature ones?
Good thinking. That would have made more room on the Ark. Just wonder, how they got them away from their big mean parents? LOL.
May 21, 2014 09:56:42 #
James Shaw wrote:
Think Noah's ark could have held this, and its mat... (show quote)
James, only the animals that are present today would have been on the ark. And there were 7 pairs of all clean animals and only 1 or 2 pairs of unclean animals. Read your Bible befor you have a brain fart.
May 21, 2014 10:38:42 #
If the ark were 450 feet long......and the maximum length for a wooden vessel is 300 feet (after that it couldn't support itself).......the point is mute.
May 21, 2014 10:42:17 #
pirate wrote:
If the ark were 450 feet long......and the maximum length for a wooden vessel is 300 feet (after that it couldn't support itself).......the point is mute.
God gave Noah the knowledge and the help to built the ark according to His design, He knew that it would float before the rains came. Otherwise what was the point.
May 21, 2014 12:38:01 #
Remus
Loc: Norfolk, UK
Noah must have discovered America and all the other unknown continents. Otherwise how did he manage to save Bison, Penguins, Polar Bears and Kangaroos?
May 21, 2014 12:45:23 #
pirate wrote:
If the ark were 450 feet long......and the maximum length for a wooden vessel is 300 feet (after that it couldn't support itself).......the point is mute.
Hey - With God all things are possible. The Red Sea should not have been able to part. Don't let facts get in the way of what the Bible says. - Dave
May 21, 2014 12:45:35 #
Remus wrote:
Noah must have discovered America and all the other unknown continents. Otherwise how did he manage to save Bison, Penguins, Polar Bears and Kangaroos?
God brought the animals to Noah, he didn't have to go gather them up.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.