Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Check out Advice from the Pros section of our forum.
Main Photography Discussion
$10,000 Fine for Drone Operator?
Page <<first <prev 4 of 9 next> last>>
May 4, 2014 07:38:52   #
EarthArts Loc: Schenectady,NY
 
jerryc41 wrote:
A drone operator who got footage of tornado damage in Arkansas might be fined $10,000 by the FAA. Several operators could also be fined if the FAA decides to go ahead with this. Freedom of the press comes into play here, and the laws are vague. News like this is going to hurt the drone industry.




An interesting discussion on drones. Let's take a realistic approach. First, who labeled them drones ? I don't know. The FAA ? Some other govt. official ? Perhaps. You can be pretty sure it was someone who wanted to create panic with the general population. After all what is the first thing that comes to mind when you mention drone . . . . Spying ? Something hovering outside your bedroom window ? Or maybe your car or house suddenly blown up. The first ones ( hexacopters, octocopters, or whatever ). Were put together by hobbyists to try to capture images that otherwise required an expensive plane. Of all the articles and ads I have read none mention spying on your neighbors. Instead they show the usefulness of these vehicles as tools for documentation and education. And some just for the joy of flying them the same as any other model airplane. Someone is desperately trying to create a negative public image of these devices . . NSA perhaps ? I see tremendous positive potential for these things. Surveying, wildlife studies, photographing remote areas, emergency searches, unique photographic angles of difficult subjects . . . . . And I am sure there are dozens of uses which could eliminate having to use an expensive aircraft, not to mention photographing areas that conventional aircraft simply cannot safely access.

So what is the down side to this ? The most obvious answer would be IDIOTS.
Common sense should tell you not to fly near an airport or it's approach & take off points. Don't fly it down the highway, causing an unsafe distraction, do not fly near emergency operations i.e. Fire or police operations , do not Hoover outside your neighbors window. Don't be a show off or use it recklessly where you could endanger someone's health. DO NOT invade someone's privacy. Get permission - a little good will goes a long way.

I am all for this technology if used in a positive and responsible manner. It has so much positive potential.

Reply
May 4, 2014 07:41:17   #
EarthArts Loc: Schenectady,NY
 
KotaKrome wrote:
Pretty soon we'll need federal government permission to fly a kite.


Just don't attach a camera to it.

Reply
May 4, 2014 08:28:47   #
oberuwe Loc: Willowbrook,IL
 
Quite simple, if one of those hover over my house my buddy's Smith and Wesson will take take of it!

Reply
Check out True Macro-Photography Forum section of our forum.
May 4, 2014 08:58:44   #
davidrb Loc: Half way there on the 45th Parallel
 
jerryc41 wrote:
A drone operator who got footage of tornado damage in Arkansas might be fined $10,000 by the FAA. Several operators could also be fined if the FAA decides to go ahead with this. Freedom of the press comes into play here, and the laws are vague. News like this is going to hurt the drone industry.


Generally speaking disaster areas automatically become restricted airspace. This is done for several obvious reasons, but primarily for safety. Emergency crews need to have unrestricted access to such areas and they do not need to be worried about idiots who have no idea what they are doing in aircraft clogging the skies. In this present age of over-reacting Uncle is assuming the worst concerning drones and their operators. Typically, we see government knee-jerk responses which end up being complete disasters of their own. Anyone remember Hillary's room-mate and his colossal "end of the world Y2K" fiasco?

Reply
May 4, 2014 09:48:48   #
clicktime Loc: Yucca Valley Ca.
 
You guys all have a valid point and they all need to be considered. The fact is there will be drone's flying in your air space. The question is, are they going to be government owned or will we be allowed to have one as well. There is a multi Billion dollar industry emerging that will help our economy recover.
Drone law
Drone regulations
Drone repair
Drone deployment
Drone licensing
Drone software
Drone photography
Battery development
Other countries are working hard to develop this technology so they can control the industry. Are we going to let them win the race or will we lead the way? It's up to you. I want to own a very valuable commercial drone license. Maybe I can sell it later and retire in comfort. It's just a cheap way to do what is already done by powerful entities.

Reply
May 4, 2014 09:50:47   #
kevinbeyer Loc: Houston TX
 
The sky is falling! Run,hide.

Reply
May 4, 2014 09:53:41   #
sr71 Loc: In Col. Juan Seguin Land
 
Rongnongno,,,,,,, YOU DO NOT OWN THE AIRSPACE ABOVE YOUR HOUSE!!!!!! You couldn't tell me what the differences are in these types of aircraft....... (I'm not talking about flying within 20-30 feet of a private home and hovering in position)




Rongnongno wrote:
It ss not about freedom of the press but flying something over a disaster area, at the risk of creating more mayhem. As to the 'drone industry' can you spell invasion of privacy first?

Once again you jump the gun and shoot your keyboard off, in the wrong forum too.

Freedom of the press. Fly one of those things over my house and I show you freedom of the press.

Reply
Check out Street Photography section of our forum.
May 4, 2014 09:54:57   #
346pak Loc: Texas
 
brucewells wrote:
Jerry, I think it has much more to do with what's in the air over our head. Since 911, the FAA has been extremely sensitive to that. The government wants the air to be clear for their drones. :-/


Jerry, unfortunately, you aren't too far off in your statement. They only want their drones and the border patrol drones (and a few others of their choosing). We are still privileged in this country in that we can hop in a private airplane and go almost anywhere with little or no contact with the FAA. That is slowly changing. They are slowly taking more control and removing some of the freedoms we once had as private pilots. Before 9/11, I flew my airplane down to big bend national park in the southwest corner of Texas. I flew over the park, flew along the Rio Grande (border of US and Mexico) for more than 50 miles and saw things not possible from the ground. it was one of the coolest things i have ever done. All without any communication or approval from the Feds. If I did that today, I would be forced down by CBP personnel and probably jailed and or fined.

That said, I really don't want someone's drone flying over my house and capturing video of me in my hot tub. You don't want to see that either....

Reply
May 4, 2014 09:55:07   #
sr71 Loc: In Col. Juan Seguin Land
 
read the above



oberuwe wrote:
Quite simple, if one of those hover over my house my buddy's Smith and Wesson will take take of it!

Reply
May 4, 2014 10:09:25   #
Dick Z. Loc: Downers Grove IL
 
jerryc41 wrote:
A drone operator who got footage of tornado damage in Arkansas might be fined $10,000 by the FAA. Several operators could also be fined if the FAA decides to go ahead with this. Freedom of the press comes into play here, and the laws are vague. News like this is going to hurt the drone industry.

I have two Quad copters. I don't know if their classed as drones as they have no cameras attached. I do fly them for fun at a designated AMA flying field. Other flyers fly them with cameras but only over the Forest Preserve, legally.

Reply
May 4, 2014 11:07:23   #
Checkmate Loc: Southern California
 
Rongnongno wrote:
It ss not about freedom of the press but flying something over a disaster area, at the risk of creating more mayhem. As to the 'drone industry' can you spell invasion of privacy first?

Once again you jump the gun and shoot your keyboard off, in the wrong forum too.

Freedom of the press. Fly one of those things over my house and I show you freedom of the press.

I guess little brown shirts like yourself enjoy shooting at police and news station helicopters who are flying overhead taking pictures of you toasting your little weenies on the bbq in the nude. Maybe they are checking on your pot garden or maybe you are beating your dogs again.

Reply
Check out Bridge Camera Show Case section of our forum.
May 4, 2014 11:19:25   #
glblanchard
 
I want one of those drones.

Reply
May 4, 2014 11:21:39   #
LEGALDR Loc: Southern California
 
Shellback wrote:
All trap and skeet shooters - there are fresh targets out there...


I like the way you think! I shall dust off the old Remington.

Reply
May 4, 2014 11:29:34   #
glblanchard
 
LEGALDR wrote:
I like the way you think! I shall dust off the old Remington.


Just wing it.

Reply
May 4, 2014 12:02:03   #
tainkc Loc: Kansas City
 
Remember when we used to just fly kites?

Reply
Page <<first <prev 4 of 9 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out Underwater Photography Forum section of our forum.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.