Male White House employees are paid more than women.
Not sure you will get much response to this TrainNut. The libs won't respond. This kind of stuff drives them crazy! Too many facts that they cannot dodge.
chiya
Loc: Wellsboro, Pa.
SBW wrote:
Not sure you will get much response to this TrainNut. The libs won't respond. This kind of stuff drives them crazy! Too many facts that they cannot dodge.
Stuff like this messes up their "republican war on women" hysteria,
SBW wrote:
Not sure you will get much response to this TrainNut. The libs won't respond. This kind of stuff drives them crazy! Too many facts that they cannot dodge.
You are right not much response. :thumbup:
It says a lot about our hypocrite president.
I wonder if it is the same with the black employees?
chiya wrote:
Stuff like this messes up their "republican war on women" hysteria,
And it is fun. :-D :-D :-D
Pepper
Loc: Planet Earth Country USA
They'll be here just as soon as they can figure out how to blame Walmart.
Pepper wrote:
They'll be here just as soon as they can figure out how to blame Walmart.
:thumbup: :lol: :lol: :lol:
It's a really good headline but the truth of the matter is that are more women employed at lower levels so the median salary is lower. However the pay grades are not separated by gender.
Of course I'm sure you're going to find some way of denying this.
Pepper wrote:
They'll be here just as soon as they can figure out how to blame Walmart.
It's a really good headline but the truth of the matter is that are more women employed at lower levels so the median salary is lower. However the pay grades are not separated by gender.
Of course I'm sure you're going to find some way of denying this
Anna M-W wrote:
It's a really good headline but the truth of the matter is that are more women employed at lower levels so the median salary is lower. However the pay grades are not separated by gender.
Of course I'm sure you're going to find some way of denying this.
So they are not giving the women the higher paying jobs because they are not able to handle them?
Anna M-W wrote:
It's a really good headline but the truth of the matter is that are more women employed at lower levels so the median salary is lower. However the pay grades are not separated by gender.
Of course I'm sure you're going to find some way of denying this.
"Obama and his political allies suggest that the pay disparity in the private sector is caused by deceptive and unfair company practices."
They would know all about that.
Anna M-W wrote:
It's a really good headline but the truth of the matter is that are more women employed at lower levels so the median salary is lower. However the pay grades are not separated by gender.
Of course I'm sure you're going to find some way of denying this.
Read what the White House press secretary Jay Carney said on Monday.
"What I can tell you is that we have, as an institution here, have aggressively addressed this challenge, and obviously, though, at the 88 cents that you cite, that is not a hundred, but it is better than the national average,"
SBW wrote:
Not sure you will get much response to this TrainNut. The libs won't respond. This kind of stuff drives them crazy! Too many facts that they cannot dodge.
Not to mention that the $0.77 per hour difference BHO dreamed up is a bogus number. :thumbup: :thumbup:
Actually, if you were to search the internet with the first sentence but substitute any job title/listing for 'White House' you could probably find more reading material than you have time to read.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.