Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
True Macro-Photography Forum
First Attempt at Macro Photography
Page 1 of 3 next> last>>
Apr 6, 2014 17:27:08   #
Photomacdog Loc: San Francisco (Bay Area) California
 
First attempt at macro photography. Camera - Nikon D5300, Lens - micro Nikkor 105mm f/2.8 VR

Room light - ISO 400, 105mm, f/8, 1/5 sec
Room light - ISO 400, 105mm, f/8, 1/5 sec...
(Download)

LED ringlight on lens - ISO 400, 105mm, f/8, 1/800
LED ringlight on lens - ISO 400, 105mm, f/8, 1/800...
(Download)

Reply
Apr 6, 2014 17:49:53   #
Macronaut Loc: Redondo Beach,Ca.
 
Looks like a very good start to me. Interesting, the difference between the lighting. Maybe just keep experimenting with your settings.

I'm only a newbie but, I might suggest trying ISO 200, 1/200-sec at f/16 for a starting point, and adjust ring light settings to see what you get. This is what was recommended to me from far more experienced folks here. You can view my flickr page to see how it's working for me.
Looking good already though :thumbup: And welcome to True Macro :D

Reply
Apr 6, 2014 19:57:45   #
Nikonian72 Loc: Chico CA
 
For comparison purposes, I suggest that you take a similar photograph using sunlight. There are basically four major sources of illumination: sunlight, incandescent light, LED light, and speedlight. Only sunlight & speedlight illumination offer low ISO, fairly short shutter duration (1/200-sec), and small aperture (f/16). For macro-photography, relying on sunlight is problematic in several ways, whereas speedlight is much more versatile.

You will find that the majority of macro-photographers who contribute to this forum, use diffused speedlight illumination.

Reply
 
 
Apr 6, 2014 22:23:03   #
LoneRangeFinder Loc: Left field
 
The first looks better focused (sharper). Also appears that it is closer to the correct WB. What did you use for WB?

Reply
Apr 6, 2014 22:43:13   #
Photomacdog Loc: San Francisco (Bay Area) California
 
Thanks for the input Bill & Douglass. Am I wrong in thinking that inside with a tripod, the two most important variable setting would be the ISO and the aperture? The ISO set, so a small aperture could be used for DOF. I have found that outside, without a tripod, it's a whole different story. The ISO should be set so that a small aperture could be used for DOF and a high shutter speed to compensate for hand held movement. Taking hand held macro is quite an art in itself. I am amazed at the beautiful pictures you two take. The only adjustment on the ring light is full and half constant light. I have the feeling I am going to have to get a speed light and a soft box.

If you look at the two photos I posted, the more interesting photo is the first one. The highlighted areas on the coin add interest and depth.

Reply
Apr 6, 2014 23:50:59   #
Nikonian72 Loc: Chico CA
 
Photomacdog wrote:
Am I wrong in thinking that inside with a tripod, the two most important variable setting would be the ISO and the aperture?
The most important variable indoors is color balance, aka White Balance (WB). Compared to sunlight, incandescent light is yellow, and fluorescent tube lights can be green. Speedlight is usually 5600 Kelvin (same as sunlight), and LED is supposed to be similar. Each camera can be adjusted to light source, either manually or automatically. I leave my WB on Auto.

ISO depends upon the intensity of the light reflected from the subject. Bright sunlight allows a low ISO (minimal digital noise), whereas incandescent light may require a much higher ISO (noticeable digital noise). Shutter duration & aperture will be dependent on ISO.

Reply
Apr 7, 2014 01:48:15   #
Photomacdog Loc: San Francisco (Bay Area) California
 
Hi again Nikonian,
I went to your two sites, the ones that have links near your avatar. I am blown away by your work. You take the most fantastic macros I have ever seen. Do you mind if I ask you a couple of questions? Do you use a tripod when you take macros in the field? You say your lite source is a speed light and a soft box. Where do you find all these bugs? How much time do you spend taking these fantastic photos?

Reply
 
 
Apr 7, 2014 02:25:41   #
Nikonian72 Loc: Chico CA
 
Photomacdog wrote:
Do you use a tripod when you take macros in the field? Where do you find all these bugs? How much time do you spend taking these fantastic photos?
No tripod: all of my images say hand-held, in text. Bill Hudson, Kim Moore, and I venture out for 2 or 3 hours just about every weekend, year-round to photograph insects. What can I say? This is Southern California.

My hand-held macro set-up
My hand-held macro set-up...

backside: SB-600 speedlight + 6x8-inch FotoDiox softbox diffuser
backside: SB-600 speedlight + 6x8-inch FotoDiox so...

Reply
Apr 7, 2014 02:35:23   #
Macronaut Loc: Redondo Beach,Ca.
 
Douglass, You need to update your set up photo with your new, not so droopy, soft box fix. :wink:

Carbon-fiber Viagra implants
Carbon-fiber Viagra implants...

Reply
Apr 7, 2014 17:48:59   #
MJPD Loc: Flemington, New Jersey
 
I would like to now where to get the ball type speed light mount that you use, I can't find it.

Reply
Apr 7, 2014 23:07:17   #
Nikonian72 Loc: Chico CA
 
MJPD wrote:
I would like to now where to get the ball type speed light mount that you use, I can't find it.
I assume you are referring to my 40-yo Kalt L-grip bracket. New bracket has no ball head, so you have to add one. Take a look here: http://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-32754-5.html#2585532

Reply
 
 
Apr 8, 2014 00:37:45   #
MJPD Loc: Flemington, New Jersey
 
Thank you.

Reply
Apr 8, 2014 11:01:01   #
berchman Loc: South Central PA
 
Nikonian72 wrote:
I assume you are referring to my 40-yo Kalt L-grip bracket. New bracket has no ball head, so you have to add one. Take a look here: http://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-32754-5.html#2585532


I notice that you are no longer using the inexpensive ring flash that attaches to the regular flash. What do you think about the following two items to make up something similar to what you are currently using?

Lastolite Ezybox Speed-Lite
Wimberley Combo 2 Macro Combo Flash Bracket

Reply
Apr 8, 2014 14:27:41   #
Nikonian72 Loc: Chico CA
 
berchman wrote:
What do you think about the following two items to make up something similar to what you are currently using?
Lastolite Ezybox Speed-Lite
Wimberley Combo 2 Macro Combo Flash Bracket
Do you mean http://www.lastolite.us/product_list/1067100.1067106.0.0.0/Ezybox_Speed-Lite which cost $116? My FotoDiox 6x8-inch cost just $15.

The Wimberley Combo 2 Macro Combo Flash Bracket cost more than $165. It is pictured below. I have nothing negative to say about it.
I have achieved the same for far less cost.

Wimberley Combo 2 Macro Combo Flash Bracket
Wimberley Combo 2 Macro Combo Flash Bracket...

Reply
Apr 8, 2014 17:28:57   #
berchman Loc: South Central PA
 
Nikonian72 wrote:
Do you mean http://www.lastolite.us/product_list/1067100.1067106.0.0.0/Ezybox_Speed-Lite which cost $116? My FotoDiox 6x8-inch cost just $15.
The Wimberley Combo 2 Macro Combo Flash Bracket cost more than $165. It is pictured below. I have nothing negative to say about it.
I have achieved the same for far less cost.
No, I meant this model which cost $75: http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/741844-REG/Lastolite_LL_LS2420S_Ezybox_Speed_Lite.html

I was frightened away by the negative reviews on Amazon of the Foto-Diox so I looked for something that didn't have such negative reviews. Obviously, you have gotten it to work well for you, but I suspect that you have mechanical ability, something I lack.

I wonder how, working handheld, you achieve such excellent focus on a live insect. Do you just move the camera a little forward and backward? Focus is so precise that you must have fantastic control of your hands. Ordinary mortals resort to a focusing rail.

Thanks for your response.

Reply
Page 1 of 3 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
True Macro-Photography Forum
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.