Kristoes wrote:
Good suggestions.
I personally dislike the subscription concept, and I liken it to renting storage; after a couple of years you could have owned your own storage garage (real story for me). I don't think I need all of the bells and whistles of Photoshop versus Lightroom.
Aren't the "tons of training videos in the deal" the same tutorials I'm pulling off the LightRoom site for free?
Going off topic slightly, since I don't yet own Photomatix, why do most folks love it so much for Post Production? I thought one reason was it's ability to merge images without as much "ghosting", etc. as other programs.
Thanks
Good suggestions. br br I personally dislike the... (
show quote)
I understand your sentiment. And if you're gonna use only LR, your probably better advised to buy it and forget CC. But, I'm confident you'll be paying for the upgrades when they come. It would be more of a difference if you were gonna use PS also. I bought PS/LR package for about $900, then the annual upgrades amounted to $200-300 for the both of them. Just the upgrades were more than the subscription is, and I don't have to wait for the upgrades to come. As soon as they are ready at Adobe, I get the download/install on my machine. PS has advanced more than LR since CC began. Since I plan to take pictures till I die, I'm gonna need something to work with them.
So, I have never used Photomatix. I hear (and have read) that it is very good if you are doing a lot of HDR stuff. It may be worth the investment. I don't think you'll find it useful for other types of photography, but I digress. As I say, I've never used it.
The guys at Kelby Training have touted PS for HDR work, and that's probably to be expected. But, they've done some really good stuff! Plus, I don't see a lot of comparisons of the two, but then, I haven't gone looking. Here's the thing, even beyond what LR will do for you, it wouldn't surprise me if you don't go looking for something that will take you to the next step. (Removing distracting power lines/people/objects from an otherwise very good photo, for example.) PS does that ever so nicely (much better than you'll be able to do in LR). It's a perfect companion to LR. And, hey! It does HDR! If you approach HDR as a specialty, and you feel you can gain from the functionality of Photomatix, then weigh that into the equation.
I haven't researched this, as it would take a while to do, but let me say that I regularly get email messages, obviously directed at Creative Cloud subscribers, listing videos that give some ideas of creativeness using these tools. Those that I've watched, I've never seen before, and I think I watched every single video at Adobe-TV when I first got LR. The videos listed in the message are geared toward creativity more so than product operation/setup type videos. (i.e. the Julienne Kost series) But, I'm sure that if you're new to Creative Cloud's products, there's a link in there that will take you to the Adobe-TV listing.
Just giving you some food for thought. Hope it helps, and sorry for being so long-winded.