tore this out a magazine
Mar 25, 2014 07:09:34 #
comments positive or negative welcome ...it all helps me progress!!
Mar 25, 2014 07:16:00 #
Shine11 wrote:
comments positive or negative welcome ...it all helps me progress!!
Good one. I've seen quite a few like that - people interacting, intentionally or not, with their environment.
Be prepared for someone to say that by posting someone else's photo you're violating their copyright.
Mar 25, 2014 07:17:31 #
jerryc41 wrote:
Good one. I've seen quite a few like that - people interacting, intentionally or not, with their environment.
Be prepared for someone to say that by posting someone else's photo you're violating their copyright.
Be prepared for someone to say that by posting someone else's photo you're violating their copyright.
Can you explain Jerry??.. It's my photo that I edited
Mar 25, 2014 07:41:36 #
Shine11 wrote:
Can you explain Jerry??.. It's my photo that I edited
Sorry, but your title implied that you tore it out of a magazine. I didn't realize it was your photo. Nice shot.
Mar 25, 2014 08:01:47 #
jerryc41 wrote:
Sorry, but your title implied that you tore it out of a magazine. I didn't realize it was your photo. Nice shot.
british sense of humour....we're dry!!!!
Mar 25, 2014 08:05:13 #
Shine11 wrote:
Can you explain Jerry??.. It's my photo that I edited
Its your photo, but do you have a release from the peson in the photo that allows you to publish on the internet?
Mar 25, 2014 08:07:04 #
David Kay wrote:
Its your photo, but do you have a release from the peson in the photo that allows you to publish on the internet?
He was in a public setting.
Mar 25, 2014 08:08:26 #
David Kay wrote:
Its your photo, but do you have a release from the peson in the photo that allows you to publish on the internet?
The graffiti is in a public place( in a tunnel ) on a public wall... He has no right to do the graffiti ... So whose permission am I meant to ask?... Very intresting debate ... Would appreciate feedback
Mar 25, 2014 08:14:44 #
David Kay wrote:
Its your photo, but do you have a release from the peson in the photo that allows you to publish on the internet?
with due respect....should we be asking the designers of architecture permission before we take shots of their work?
Mar 25, 2014 08:23:05 #
I like the shot.
But, in response to asking for criticism, when I tear something out of a magazine, I rarely get such irregular edges. Here they look more like the edges were chewed than torn.
But, in response to asking for criticism, when I tear something out of a magazine, I rarely get such irregular edges. Here they look more like the edges were chewed than torn.
Mar 25, 2014 08:27:35 #
Violameister wrote:
I like the shot.
But, in response to asking for criticism, when I tear something out of a magazine, I rarely get such irregular edges. Here they look more like the edges were chewed than torn.
But, in response to asking for criticism, when I tear something out of a magazine, I rarely get such irregular edges. Here they look more like the edges were chewed than torn.
It's the first time I have tried it and fully Agree that it looks like a mouse has chewed it ... Can you download and repost a better job .. Or post one of yr own with the 'torn edge effect '... If you can I would appreciate instruction on how you did it.. Thank you
Mar 25, 2014 08:31:02 #
David Kay wrote:
Its your photo, but do you have a release from the peson in the photo that allows you to publish on the internet?
:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:
Mar 25, 2014 08:32:19 #
Mar 25, 2014 08:34:47 #
Mar 25, 2014 08:38:26 #
Shine11 wrote:
with due respect....should we be asking the designers of architecture permission before we take shots of their work?
If you know the law in the US, if you take a photo of the building from a public location you MAY be ok to use it.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.