Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
cropped sensor cameras
Page <<first <prev 4 of 4
Feb 23, 2014 22:14:53   #
lukan Loc: Chicago, IL
 
amehta wrote:
I cropped, did not resize, so I did exactly the same thing as you. The original was the D800 native resolution, 7360x4912, and this is the 1200x1800 crop.


Cameras being equal, it's about the glass.

Reply
Feb 23, 2014 22:28:12   #
amehta Loc: Boston
 
lukan wrote:
Cameras being equal, it's about the glass.

Yes, and it's a safe guess that SteveR's and my D800s are equal. :-)

Reply
Feb 23, 2014 22:42:47   #
lukan Loc: Chicago, IL
 
amehta wrote:
Yes, and it's a safe guess that SteveR's and my D800s are equal. :-)


Yep, pretty safe guess on the 2 D800s being equal. Back to the glass...

Reply
 
 
Feb 24, 2014 18:23:30   #
SteveR Loc: Michigan
 
amehta...You are totally correct. Nikon primes are totally awesome. They remind of the quote that "Nikon lenses are the reason you buy Nikon." Yes, my 28-300mm has it's use. I can put it on the camera and never take it off on a day trip or vacation and it will give me "good" photos. I've been taking "good" photos all my life...starting with my Canon ftb. However, looking at the photo you posted taken with your 800 and a prime, it shocks me about what is actually possible with an "excellent" lens. I have one, the 50mm 1.8D. I haven't used it much, but I'm going to put it on my 800 one day and go out and shoot it for a day and see what I get. Budget wise, though, I had to start with the camera. I have another question, though. How do you compare the primes to the trinity? I've heard excellent things about the trinity, and the zoom aspect, again, provides convenience.

Reply
Feb 24, 2014 18:43:12   #
amehta Loc: Boston
 
SteveR wrote:
amehta...You are totally correct. Nikon primes are totally awesome. They remind of the quote that "Nikon lenses are the reason you buy Nikon." Yes, my 28-300mm has it's use. I can put it on the camera and never take it off on a day trip or vacation and it will give me "good" photos. I've been taking "good" photos all my life...starting with my Canon ftb. However, looking at the photo you posted taken with your 800 and a prime, it shocks me about what is actually possible with an "excellent" lens. I have one, the 50mm 1.8D. I haven't used it much, but I'm going to put it on my 800 one day and go out and shoot it for a day and see what I get. Budget wise, though, I had to start with the camera. I have another question, though. How do you compare the primes to the trinity? I've heard excellent things about the trinity, and the zoom aspect, again, provides convenience.
amehta...You are totally correct. Nikon primes ar... (show quote)

I totally understand about budget constraints.

I meant to suggest using the 50mm f/1.8D for your next "family shoot". I had the previous incarnation of the trinity: 17-35mm f/2.8, 28-70mm f/2.8, 70-200mm f/2.8 VR I. As you saw, I've sold two, and the third has been used once in a year and a half. I found I used the zooms at the "edges", so getting primes at 14mm, 24mm, 85mm, and 300mm seemed to fit what I was doing with the zooms.

I did rent a 24-70mm f/2.8 for a wedding last Nov, and while the 24mm and 85mm would have given better IQ, the versatility of the zoom was helpful in the venue. That wedding was also when the 70-200mm was used.

Reply
Feb 24, 2014 19:36:21   #
lukan Loc: Chicago, IL
 
amehta wrote:
I totally understand about budget constraints.

I meant to suggest using the 50mm f/1.8D for your next "family shoot". I had the previous incarnation of the trinity: 17-35mm f/2.8, 28-70mm f/2.8, 70-200mm f/2.8 VR I. As you saw, I've sold two, and the third has been used once in a year and a half. I found I used the zooms at the "edges", so getting primes at 14mm, 24mm, 85mm, and 300mm seemed to fit what I was doing with the zooms.

I did rent a 24-70mm f/2.8 for a wedding last Nov, and while the 24mm and 85mm would have given better IQ, the versatility of the zoom was helpful in the venue. That wedding was also when the 70-200mm was used.
I totally understand about budget constraints. br ... (show quote)


I was going to ask you what you would get greater utility from, an 85 f1.8 or a 135 f1.8, but I already know. Did you sell your zooms?

Reply
Feb 24, 2014 23:59:49   #
amehta Loc: Boston
 
lukan wrote:
I was going to ask you what you would get greater utility from, an 85 f1.8 or a 135 f1.8, but I already know. Did you sell your zooms?

:thumbup:
I had the 135mm f/2 DC, which is a great camera, but once I had the 85mm, it sat idle, so I sold it to my dad. I'm not sure if he's used it much either. I sold three of the four zooms from the Nikon "trinity+1". Everything evolves. :-)

Reply
 
 
Feb 25, 2014 06:10:09   #
lukan Loc: Chicago, IL
 
amehta wrote:
:thumbup:
I had the 135mm f/2 DC, which is a great camera, but once I had the 85mm, it sat idle, so I sold it to my dad. I'm not sure if he's used it much either. I sold three of the four zooms from the Nikon "trinity+1". Everything evolves. :-)


I figured the 85mm was the winner (since it's stated in your sig). I personally have always been drawn to the 24-28mm, 85mm and the 300mm focal lengths. Everything does, indeed, evolve. Very compelling thought process, here. 8-)

Reply
Apr 18, 2014 10:25:56   #
sirlensalot Loc: Arizona
 
About 90% of DSLR's sold are APS-c sensor. Personally, I feel more comfortable using FF for weddings and portraits, real estate, APS-c for sports/action to get the FOV from zooms, and travel for weight savings because I try to limit myself to one lens for convenience. Don't own any 4/3 equipment, but also think they will be growing in sales as they evolve in technology. Just posting in general terms as their are exceptions for each category. I think the best bang for the buck right now is the APS-c. Canon, Nikon, Sony, Pentax have very competitively priced models. Suggest researching sensor ratings at DxO mark, then going to local store if possible and talking with sales staff, asking lots of questions, and handling as many as you can. More than likely, your camera will choose you depending on a few of the above stated factors.

Reply
Apr 18, 2014 10:35:07   #
DavidPine Loc: Fredericksburg, TX
 
amehta wrote:
Sadly, no, I appreciate my primes with the D800. The problem with digital pictures is that it's so easy to just click on the picture for 100% magnification, and on my little laptop, that still effectively shows a portion of a 3' wide picture, viewed from less than 2' away. So I know I'm looking too close, but I prefer it sharper.

I know we're completely off topic, though if the OP is still interested in what FF can do, talking about the D800 is almost relevant. :-)

This shot was taken with the Nikon 85mm f/1.4, but the 85mm f/1.8 should be very comparable, and it's relatively inexpensive (given the scale already defined by the D800 ;-) ). It is cropped to basically the same size as the crop of your son. Granted, this was a studio portrait session with a friend, but outdoor shots with the 85mm are just as sharp. And, since nobody wants a portrait to be quite that detailed, the second shot is after post processing (DxO Optics Pro + Portrait Professional).
Sadly, no, I appreciate my primes with the D800. ... (show quote)


:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

Reply
Apr 18, 2014 13:53:49   #
Bobspez Loc: Southern NJ, USA
 
The biggest difference I see is that with a crop sensor like the Nikon DX your lenses are effectively 1.5x times the focal length compared to a ff. So the major downside, is that on a 19mm wide angle lens, the cropped sensor only gives the equivalent of a 28mm lens view on a full frame.
The major plus for me is the cost.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 4 of 4
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.